Tombstone Warz Game Thread

[relantel]

I'd be inclined to join the shaf vote but benny strikes me as a better target. that or PFiDC.

[Gaucho]

Now I feel bad.

[TheHammer24]

Now I feel bad.

I'm getting better.

[redwill]

Are you expecting some legal trouble in the state of Illinois?

I hope not, if TH24's all I got on my side.

[Gaucho]

Oh snap.

[TheHammer24]

Are you expecting some legal trouble in the state of Illinois?

I hope not, if TH24's all I got on my side.

Sad again.

[redwill]

We play hardball here, son. We play hardball or people die.

(A Few Good Men misquote.)

[redwill]

OK, OK. So people die no matter what we do.

It's fun.

[relantel]

I've got to leave the office, but before I do, lynch shaf. Let's get this over with.

[shafnutz05]

I think a red would be most scared of things not making sense right now. They attempted to kill and didn't succeed.

Kill shaf.

Feeling pretty good about my MWB Vote right now.

[shafnutz05]

And it sucks that putting a contrarian opinion out there is going to get me knocked out of the game, but it is what it is.

[relantel]

And it sucks that putting a contrarian opinion out there is going to get me knocked out of the game, but it is what it is.

Contrarian only goes so far when contrarian illuminates the wrong alignment

[columbia]

I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.

[Sam's Drunk Dog]

shafnutz05 – 4 (Benny Fitz, nan, MWB, relantel)
PFiDC - 1 (mac5155)
TheHammer24 – 1 (Gaucho)
columbia – 2 (canaan, redwill)
Redwill – 1(Hammer)
MWB -1 (shafnutz)

Deadline is 7PM.

[mac5155]

Not to mention relantel isn't usually one to vote "to get things moving"

[columbia]

I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.

If he turns out to be red, I'm sure I'll be killed ASAP....but that's the way it goes.

[MWB]

I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.

Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.

[shafnutz05]

I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.

Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.

And that's fine. I'm sticking with the same sentiments I've had literally since the start of the game. For all I know, the entire thing may be a gigantic waste of time. But I haven't wavered since the start.

I would request, in the future, that for all write-ups, all player names are in white unless they are actually being revealed as something. I don't mind having the cowboys in red or the Earps in green, but not a fan of just the names in the writeup being blue for no reason. Just my 2 cents.

[TheHammer24]

I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.

Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.

Actually it did.

Redwill voted immediately because "he agreed with Shad" and PFIDC shortly thereafter suggested MWB could be bad as well. To me, it sounds like a blue reasoned why he wanted to kill MWB and two possible red-candidates jumped right on that.

Still, MWB's non-kill is reminding me a lot of Redwill's "independent" last game, and the person leading that charge was the Angel, and his charge led another Green to attack the Angel, resulting in a double outting.

[MWB]

I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.

Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.

And that's fine. I'm sticking with the same sentiments I've had literally since the start of the game. For all I know, the entire thing may be a gigantic waste of time. But I haven't wavered since the start.

I would request, in the future, that for all write-ups, all player names are in white unless they are actually being revealed as something. I don't mind having the cowboys in red or the Earps in green, but not a fan of just the names in the writeup being blue for no reason. Just my 2 cents. :D

You thought I was red since "literally" the start of the game? Wow. Did my name come out red to you in a vision when you saw the initial write up?

[TheHammer24]

[shafnutz05]

I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.

Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.

And that's fine. I'm sticking with the same sentiments I've had literally since the start of the game. For all I know, the entire thing may be a gigantic waste of time. But I haven't wavered since the start.

I would request, in the future, that for all write-ups, all player names are in white unless they are actually being revealed as something. I don't mind having the cowboys in red or the Earps in green, but not a fan of just the names in the writeup being blue for no reason. Just my 2 cents.

You thought I was red since "literally" the start of the game? Wow. Did my name come out red to you in a vision when you saw the initial write up?

No, as in I thought something was weird since the beginning. I didn't really consider voting for you as red until today.

[MWB]

I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.

Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.

Actually it did.

Redwill voted immediately because "he agreed with Shad" and PFIDC shortly thereafter suggested MWB could be bad as well. To me, it sounds like a blue reasoned why he wanted to kill MWB and two possible red-candidates jumped right on that.

Still, MWB's non-kill is reminding me a lot of Redwill's "independent" last game, and the person leading that charge was the Angel, and his charge led another Green to attack the Angel, resulting in a double outting.

Didn't gain traction in that it didn't get more votes. Reds would be stupid to pile votes on one person without blues in there as well.

[MWB]

No, as in I thought something was weird since the beginning. I didn't really consider voting for you as red until today.

Interesting. What changed it to red today?

[MWB]

Oh, the blue color just threw me off. Don't understand why he was portrayed as blue.

Would have nominated redwill in a vacuum, but with this perceived info, I'll nominate MWB

Shaf, what are you talking about? This is your vote for me on day 1.