Tombstone Warz Game Thread
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
I'd be inclined to join the shaf vote but benny strikes me as a better target. that or PFiDC.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 44375
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Ignoranti
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
Now I feel bad.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
I'm getting better.Gaucho wrote:Now I feel bad.
![Thumbs Up :thumb:](./images/smilies/thumbup.gif)
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
I hope not, if TH24's all I got on my side.columbia wrote:Are you expecting some legal trouble in the state of Illinois?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 44375
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Ignoranti
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
Oh snap.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
Sad again.redwill wrote:I hope not, if TH24's all I got on my side.columbia wrote:Are you expecting some legal trouble in the state of Illinois?
![Sad :-(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
We play hardball here, son. We play hardball or people die.
(A Few Good Men misquote.)
(A Few Good Men misquote.)
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
OK, OK. So people die no matter what we do.
It's fun.
It's fun.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
I've got to leave the office, but before I do, lynch shaf. Let's get this over with.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
Feeling pretty good about my MWB Vote right now.MWB wrote:I think a red would be most scared of things not making sense right now. They attempted to kill and didn't succeed.
Kill shaf.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
And it sucks that putting a contrarian opinion out there is going to get me knocked out of the game, but it is what it is.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
Contrarian only goes so far when contrarian illuminates the wrong alignmentshafnutz05 wrote:And it sucks that putting a contrarian opinion out there is going to get me knocked out of the game, but it is what it is.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
shafnutz05 – 4 (Benny Fitz, nan, MWB, relantel)
PFiDC - 1 (mac5155)
TheHammer24 – 1 (Gaucho)
columbia – 2 (canaan, redwill)
Redwill – 1(Hammer)
MWB -1 (shafnutz)
Deadline is 7PM.
PFiDC - 1 (mac5155)
TheHammer24 – 1 (Gaucho)
columbia – 2 (canaan, redwill)
Redwill – 1(Hammer)
MWB -1 (shafnutz)
Deadline is 7PM.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
Not to mention relantel isn't usually one to vote "to get things moving"
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
If he turns out to be red, I'm sure I'll be killed ASAP....but that's the way it goes.columbia wrote:I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.columbia wrote:I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
And that's fine. I'm sticking with the same sentiments I've had literally since the start of the game. For all I know, the entire thing may be a gigantic waste of time. But I haven't wavered since the start.MWB wrote:Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.columbia wrote:I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.
I would request, in the future, that for all write-ups, all player names are in white unless they are actually being revealed as something. I don't mind having the cowboys in red or the Earps in green, but not a fan of just the names in the writeup being blue for no reason. Just my 2 cents.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
Actually it did.MWB wrote:Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.columbia wrote:I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.
Redwill voted immediately because "he agreed with Shad" and PFIDC shortly thereafter suggested MWB could be bad as well. To me, it sounds like a blue reasoned why he wanted to kill MWB and two possible red-candidates jumped right on that.
Still, MWB's non-kill is reminding me a lot of Redwill's "independent" last game, and the person leading that charge was the Angel, and his charge led another Green to attack the Angel, resulting in a double outting.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
You thought I was red since "literally" the start of the game? Wow. Did my name come out red to you in a vision when you saw the initial write up?shafnutz05 wrote:And that's fine. I'm sticking with the same sentiments I've had literally since the start of the game. For all I know, the entire thing may be a gigantic waste of time. But I haven't wavered since the start.MWB wrote:Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.columbia wrote:I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.
I would request, in the future, that for all write-ups, all player names are in white unless they are actually being revealed as something. I don't mind having the cowboys in red or the Earps in green, but not a fan of just the names in the writeup being blue for no reason. Just my 2 cents. :D
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
No, as in I thought something was weird since the beginning. I didn't really consider voting for you as red until today.MWB wrote:You thought I was red since "literally" the start of the game? Wow. Did my name come out red to you in a vision when you saw the initial write up?shafnutz05 wrote:And that's fine. I'm sticking with the same sentiments I've had literally since the start of the game. For all I know, the entire thing may be a gigantic waste of time. But I haven't wavered since the start.MWB wrote:Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.columbia wrote:I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.
I would request, in the future, that for all write-ups, all player names are in white unless they are actually being revealed as something. I don't mind having the cowboys in red or the Earps in green, but not a fan of just the names in the writeup being blue for no reason. Just my 2 cents.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
Didn't gain traction in that it didn't get more votes. Reds would be stupid to pile votes on one person without blues in there as well.TheHammer24 wrote:Actually it did.MWB wrote:Because no nonreds are going along with him. If you were red, would you just jump on with your fellow red or would you wait for others to join? He put the vote out there early and it hasn't gained traction.columbia wrote:I'm not saying that MWB is red or blue, but if shad were red, why would he be the only one going after MWB?
That doesn't add up and the vote on shad seems misguided.
Redwill voted immediately because "he agreed with Shad" and PFIDC shortly thereafter suggested MWB could be bad as well. To me, it sounds like a blue reasoned why he wanted to kill MWB and two possible red-candidates jumped right on that.
Still, MWB's non-kill is reminding me a lot of Redwill's "independent" last game, and the person leading that charge was the Angel, and his charge led another Green to attack the Angel, resulting in a double outting.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
Interesting. What changed it to red today?shafnutz05 wrote:
No, as in I thought something was weird since the beginning. I didn't really consider voting for you as red until today.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Tombstone Warz Game Thread
Shaf, what are you talking about? This is your vote for me on day 1.shafnutz05 wrote:Oh, the blue color just threw me off. Don't understand why he was portrayed as blue.
Would have nominated redwill in a vacuum, but with this perceived info, I'll nominate MWB