Hmm. So Nan was a vig... which means if standard rules are followed he could only shoot every other night. He most likely used that shot on night 2, meaning he would not get a shot on night 3. This means there is another player who can kill out there, be it an isk or joat... or a naughty vig.
the wicked child wrote:Hmm. So Nan was a vig... which means if standard rules are followed he could only shoot every other night. He most likely used that shot on night 2, meaning he would not get a shot on night 3. This means there is another player who can kill out there, be it an isk or joat... or a naughty vig.
i would also venture a guess that NAN Was killed with 1 in the chamber (if thats possible without the killer dying too) because he's smart; he'd rather save the bullet and have better odds at getting a bad guy
the wicked child wrote:Hmm. So Nan was a vig... which means if standard rules are followed he could only shoot every other night. He most likely used that shot on night 2, meaning he would not get a shot on night 3. This means there is another player who can kill out there, be it an isk or joat... or a naughty vig.
Based on the last two games, and I only followed them loosely, it's probably an independent serial killer. So, if someone is recruited are we told? One of the games had a recruit-able independent in it but I don't know if anyone can be recruited in this game.
the wicked child wrote:Hmm. So Nan was a vig... which means if standard rules are followed he could only shoot every other night. He most likely used that shot on night 2, meaning he would not get a shot on night 3. This means there is another player who can kill out there, be it an isk or joat... or a naughty vig.
somehow i doubt the joat shot anyone yet... there's no real proof that anyone is on the bad list and he only gets one shot, so he probably didn't waste it already, so i'm guessing there's either an independent vig or naughty vig (probably independent if i had to put money on it, because there was an independent vig last game...)
the wicked child wrote:Hmm. So Nan was a vig... which means if standard rules are followed he could only shoot every other night. He most likely used that shot on night 2, meaning he would not get a shot on night 3. This means there is another player who can kill out there, be it an isk or joat... or a naughty vig.
Based on the last two games, and I only followed them loosely, it's probably an independent serial killer. So, if someone is recruited are we told? One of the games had a recruit-able independent in it but I don't know if anyone can be recruited in this game.
last game there was a vampire that was recruited when the goons tried to kill them. my guess is that player has been kept, as KS, now mod, was a goon last game and that vampire (shafnutz) helped them a lot.
if someone's converted i don't think they're announced dead, i think there'll be something in the write-up that says something happened, but not outright "this person was converted..."
don't think there were any kind of conversions yet... just deaths. Just have to make sure we pay attention to the writeups for anything beyond standard deaths.
I'm still stunned that nobody even seemed to take notice of the conversion last game.
One of the two people NAN mentioned by name. He's been around the boards, just not being active in this thread. It might just be strategy to take NAN out, but I don't have any other suspicions to go on at this time.
One of the two people NAN mentioned by name. He's been around the boards, just not being active in this thread. It might just be strategy to take NAN out, but I don't have any other suspicions to go on at this time.
Agreed. I definitely think Troy Loney has been suspicious this game.
The only other one who I think could be a boss that I mentioned to NAN during the last day was sdm, who has been unusually quiet. I don't think he's posted more than once, if that.
unwrap Louis Winthorpe (Troy Loney)
...I heard he lost his job, fiance, and got caught with a prostitute. Plus, i just like wearing his Harvard tie. Like I went to Harvard.
I believe PFIDC has a role where he can kill. I held off drawing attention to it, in case he was our vig. Now that our vig has been killed, I believe PFIDC to be a bad guy or independent. Unless he was framed.
slappy, cuz he's the RP who held up the game on the weekend last time, even though he was online. Also, he and cup keeper voted to kill wally earlier in the game.
I have to go to work soon. I'll see what you guys have to say, and cast a vote for one of these two, barring new evidence, before I leave.
mac5155 wrote:maybee i'm reading a bit much into the writeup but it mentions bad santa (slappybrown?) finding NAN. or no??
Azkar wrote:As Bad Santa goes in to Victoria Secret to buy something extra special for his Bad Girlfriend, he finds an all too familiar sight. There is blood EVERYWHERE.
I wouldn't be opposed to going this way, but I'd like to see a little more evidence and/or support.
mac5155 wrote:maybee i'm reading a bit much into the writeup but it mentions bad santa (slappybrown?) finding NAN. or no??
Azkar wrote:As Bad Santa goes in to Victoria Secret to buy something extra special for his Bad Girlfriend, he finds an all too familiar sight. There is blood EVERYWHERE.
I wouldn't be opposed to going this way, but I'd like to see a little more evidence and/or support.
yeah it could just be me thinking way too much. i doubt it has anything to do with that.
thehockeyguru wrote:Who knows anything about Jose? Why did he vote me?
because of the last game and in the post game how you said that was your strategy. Your strategy did nothing but hurt the village and he is worried you will try something similar again here and hurt the village...a la, better to remove you now before you start that.
that's how I understood his post. I tend to agree with him, but wanting to give you a chance on your 2nd game and see if your style isn't so erratic. I know my first game i was a bit out there as well (albeit, nothing compared to you)
I waited the entire weekend to say-
I didn't really follow last game, but I read the ending with posters wanting to cause as much confusion as possible. That's never a good thing. I figured it was a low risk move at the beginning to unwrap thg.
mac5155 wrote:maybee i'm reading a bit much into the writeup but it mentions bad santa (slappybrown?) finding NAN. or no??
Azkar wrote:As Bad Santa goes in to Victoria Secret to buy something extra special for his Bad Girlfriend, he finds an all too familiar sight. There is blood EVERYWHERE.
I wouldn't be opposed to going this way, but I'd like to see a little more evidence and/or support.
I would severely doubt the mods would goof like that. There are two of them to catch those mistakes.
count2infinity wrote:i wouldn't put any value into that write-up... i think that would almost be WAY too big of a hint from azkar
This, I didnt go back and look at this writeup, but in the Nintendo game the mod used all random names.. durring day phases he used the last person to cast the vote
should we eliminate experienced players or newbies? The naughty list seems to be eliminating veterans, which i would do as well if i were them, but should we start looking at some vets as they are not getting axed by the naughty list so may be a member of the naughty list?
count2infinity wrote:question for the good listers:
should we eliminate experienced players or newbies? The naughty list seems to be eliminating veterans, which i would do as well if i were them, but should we start looking at some vets as they are not getting axed by the naughty list so may be a member of the naughty list?
good point, but some of those kills could be from independent (althought I guess that is bad too) and also could have been from NAN (unlikely he used a kill though)