Jerry Sandusky and Related Trials

Forum for posts that are not hockey-related.
viva la ben
AHL Hall of Famer
AHL Hall of Famer
Posts: 9888
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:45 am
Location: Location: Location

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by viva la ben »

Anyone know the status of the Paterno's investigation of the Freeh report?
Pitt87
AHL All-Star
AHL All-Star
Posts: 5956
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:33 am
Location: Admin wrote:Rooting for the Flyers is not allowed here. Seriously.

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by Pitt87 »

DontToewsMeBro wrote:You mean take time to conduct your own investigation and to think clearly about the implications of your actions after the emotional ****storm has passed and the pitchforks have been put away?

Nonsense.
Implications of who's actions? Are you talking about Erickson? He was protecting the school from further scrutiny, if nothing else. A wider NCAA investigations would have found hundreds of violations in the football program.

Ask someone who works in PR or crisis management and they will tell you that PSU acted too slowly, not too quickly. Acting swiftly generally works to your benefit, while waiting will consistently create more fires.
JS©
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 21372
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:52 am
Location: hello guv'nor

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by JS© »

Since PSU forfeited all of their wins from 1998-2011, who gets credit for the win in 2010 vs Ohio State? OSU also forfeited their wins that season.
DontToewsMeBro
AHL'er
AHL'er
Posts: 4710
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:31 pm

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by DontToewsMeBro »

Maybe take into consideration the trials of two of the people's actions you based the penalties off of? When you say you can't question somebodies character yet you punish a program based off of their inactions, that's gutless. For better or worse, they needed to wait. This could turn out to be a huge mess for the NCAA and the spineless administration of the University.
Pavel Bure
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15030
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: http://freebitco.in/?r=770437 BITCOINS get them

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by Pavel Bure »

JS© wrote:Since PSU forfeited all of their wins from 1998-2011, who gets credit for the win in 2010 vs Ohio State? OSU also forfeited their wins that season.
The wins are forfeited but they are not turned into losses and the teams that lost still have those losses.
Rylan
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 16216
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
Location: Dead and Without Love

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by Rylan »

I just thought the games become null. Like a, "we didn't win, but you didn't lose either."
Pavel Bure
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15030
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: http://freebitco.in/?r=770437 BITCOINS get them

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by Pavel Bure »

DontToewsMeBro wrote:Maybe take into consideration the trials of two of the people's actions you based the penalties off of? When you say you can't question somebodies character yet you punish a program based off of their inactions, that's gutless. For better or worse, they needed to wait. This could turn out to be a huge mess for the NCAA and the spineless administration of the University.
The school (PSU) was facing a deeper investigation that would have led directly to the death penalty of at least 4 years. This was just reported on ESPN, they saved the program as much as they could from being decimated for the next 30+ years.
pfim
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 16796
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:35 am
Location: Sitting in front of my computer

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by pfim »

Rylan wrote:I just thought the games become null. Like a, "we didn't win, but you didn't lose either."
Vacating wins means PSU loses the wins, but no one gains them (the opposing team).

Forfeiting games would mean PSU loses the wins and the opponent gains them.
Rylan
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 16216
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
Location: Dead and Without Love

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by Rylan »

pfim wrote:
Rylan wrote:I just thought the games become null. Like a, "we didn't win, but you didn't lose either."
Vacating wins means PSU loses the wins, but no one gains them (the opposing team).

Forfeiting games would mean PSU loses the wins and the opponent gains them.
So were the wins vacated or forfeited? I thought it was vacated?
pfim
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 16796
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:35 am
Location: Sitting in front of my computer

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by pfim »

Vacated. So PSU just loses the wins. Was just confirming.
shmenguin
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 25041
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by shmenguin »

the psu-miami game in 1999 was the the most upsetting loss i've ever witnessed in person. i'm glad we finally won that game.
Rocco
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 37197
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:34 am
Location: Manor Farm

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by Rocco »

Pavel Bure wrote:
Rocco wrote:
MWB wrote:How would an NCAA investigation be different than the Freeh investigation (aside from taking months and months and months)?
PSU would be given a notice of allegations, a hearing and an opportunity to respond to the allegations.
They had that chance and they signed off on everything in the investigations already done as truth in essence waiving their hearing and opportunity to respond.
Not really. Emmert and the NCAA Board read the Freeh report and put a gun to PSU's head and threatened them with the death penalty, knowing that Erickson was in no position to fight back and call their bluff. Emmert knew that if it went through the normal procedures the Infractions committee would likely determine that the actions didn't fit as NCAA violations so he skipped that part.
The Snapshot
AHL Hall of Famer
AHL Hall of Famer
Posts: 8600
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:28 am
Location: Somewhere between here and there

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by The Snapshot »

mac5155 wrote:Spanier now saying he was abused as a child.
He is about to abused as an adult also, after his trial.
Rocco
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 37197
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:34 am
Location: Manor Farm

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by Rocco »

The Snapshot wrote:
mac5155 wrote:Spanier now saying he was abused as a child.
He is about to abused as an adult also, after his trial.
I don't believe Spanier has been charged with anything yet. The NCAA of course said little to nothing about him, because he's alive and capable of responding. The NCAA is really smart about picking their targets.
Big Easy Pens Fan
ECHL'er
ECHL'er
Posts: 2430
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:18 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by Big Easy Pens Fan »

pfim wrote:Vacated. So PSU just loses the wins. Was just confirming.

This brings up an interesting development: The 2010 Ohio State-Penn State game was won by no one, since OSU vacated that win already.

BEPF
pfim
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 16796
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:35 am
Location: Sitting in front of my computer

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by pfim »

Big Easy Pens Fan wrote:
pfim wrote:Vacated. So PSU just loses the wins. Was just confirming.

This brings up an interesting development: The 2010 Ohio State-Penn State game was won by no one, since OSU vacated that win already.

BEPF

Well, you can say that about all the wins that the NCAA vacated. No one won those games.
Pavel Bure
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15030
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: http://freebitco.in/?r=770437 BITCOINS get them

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by Pavel Bure »

Rocco wrote:
Pavel Bure wrote:
Rocco wrote:
MWB wrote:How would an NCAA investigation be different than the Freeh investigation (aside from taking months and months and months)?
PSU would be given a notice of allegations, a hearing and an opportunity to respond to the allegations.
They had that chance and they signed off on everything in the investigations already done as truth in essence waiving their hearing and opportunity to respond.
Not really. Emmert and the NCAA Board read the Freeh report and put a gun to PSU's head and threatened them with the death penalty, knowing that Erickson was in no position to fight back and call their bluff. Emmert knew that if it went through the normal procedures the Infractions committee would likely determine that the actions didn't fit as NCAA violations so he skipped that part.
Read above. They saved the program as much as they could.
The Snapshot
AHL Hall of Famer
AHL Hall of Famer
Posts: 8600
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:28 am
Location: Somewhere between here and there

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by The Snapshot »

Pitt87 wrote:
DontToewsMeBro wrote:You mean take time to conduct your own investigation and to think clearly about the implications of your actions after the emotional ****storm has passed and the pitchforks have been put away?

Nonsense.
Implications of who's actions? Are you talking about Erickson? He was protecting the school from further scrutiny, if nothing else. A wider NCAA investigations would have found hundreds of violations in the football program.

Ask someone who works in PR or crisis management and they will tell you that PSU acted too slowly, not too quickly. Acting swiftly generally works to your benefit, while waiting will consistently create more fires.
Which is why I was advocating the self-imposed death penalty - not to save face for the football team, but the University's reputation. It would have stood for something in the face of all of this. Now they just look guilty as an Institution and too weak to act for what was right - starting in 1998 and continuing all the way to today.

So depressing.
Rocco
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 37197
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:34 am
Location: Manor Farm

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by Rocco »

Pavel Bure wrote:
Rocco wrote:
Pavel Bure wrote:
Rocco wrote:
MWB wrote:How would an NCAA investigation be different than the Freeh investigation (aside from taking months and months and months)?
PSU would be given a notice of allegations, a hearing and an opportunity to respond to the allegations.
They had that chance and they signed off on everything in the investigations already done as truth in essence waiving their hearing and opportunity to respond.
Not really. Emmert and the NCAA Board read the Freeh report and put a gun to PSU's head and threatened them with the death penalty, knowing that Erickson was in no position to fight back and call their bluff. Emmert knew that if it went through the normal procedures the Infractions committee would likely determine that the actions didn't fit as NCAA violations so he skipped that part.
Read above. They saved the program as much as they could.
Let's just say I would have liked to have seen what would have happened if Emmert tried to unilaterally impose the penalties and PSU had a problem with it. Just about everyone who is knowledgeable on the subject seems to think that Emmert could only pull this off because PSU wasn't willing to fight back. According to John Infante, Emmert couldn't have imposed anything unilaterally. Past enforcement presidents have said this wouldn't have fit into the Infractions Committee framework. However, PSU and Erickson would have been painted as saying child rape is okay had they tried to fight it so they took what was given.
Big Easy Pens Fan
ECHL'er
ECHL'er
Posts: 2430
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:18 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by Big Easy Pens Fan »

"vacated" wins means that the rule of competition (every game always has a winner and a loser) is put on hold.

BEPF
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15747
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by MWB »

DontToewsMeBro wrote:Maybe take into consideration the trials of two of the people's actions you based the penalties off of? When you say you can't question somebodies character yet you punish a program based off of their inactions, that's gutless. For better or worse, they needed to wait. This could turn out to be a huge mess for the NCAA and the spineless administration of the University.
What are you trying to determine? What is the purpose of more investigation? It would seem that PSU saw this as the best way for the university to move forward.
DudeMan2766
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 12037
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:33 pm
Location: Forever in blue jeans

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by DudeMan2766 »

Big bad NCAA bullying good ol humble PSU. Some of you are really reaching for any scraps you can to argue PSU was wronged.
shafnutz05
NHL First Liner
NHL First Liner
Posts: 60559
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
Location: Amish Country

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by shafnutz05 »

DudeMan2766 wrote:Big bad NCAA bullying good ol humble PSU. Some of you are really reaching for any scraps you can to argue PSU was wronged.
Well, Emmert did unilaterally lay down a crushing blow on the program without any due process or hearing. Granted, Erickson signed off on it.
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15747
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by MWB »

That's what I'm not getting. Are people concerned that the investigation/punishment was handled inappropriately and it's a matter of principle? Or are people concerned that PSU is getting screwed in some way here?

It seems that if PSU paid for a report to be done, that said report was used to create a punishment that PSU signed off on, and that the punishment was done expeditiously so that PSU could move forward, what is there to complain about?
bhaw
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 28740
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell

Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial

Post by bhaw »

MWB wrote:That's what I'm not getting. Are people concerned that the investigation/punishment was handled inappropriately and it's a matter of principle? Or are people concerned that PSU is getting screwed in some way here?

It seems that if PSU paid for a report to be done, that said report was used to create a punishment that PSU signed off on, and that the punishment was done expeditiously so that PSU could move forward, what is there to complain about?
People should be more upset with PSU than the NCAA.