I did not claim to shoot THG. I just assumed it was in the write up like that because I saw him that night. I assumed that Pavel then created a shot to lead into today's drama of me having to kill THG. I did not even read that I died in that initial write up.relantel wrote:hammer, your claim is not entirely implausable to me - I could see Pavel doing wacky roles like this. The stickler is (and to qualify, this assumes I read the writeup correctly) THG only was shot at once. You clamimed to have seen, then shot, THG. My bullet went to THG. I only saw one missed shot.
Then, someone pointed out that THG killed me and I was resurrected. And you claimed to shoot THG. Then, the write up makes even more sense -- you shot THG and missed -- highlanders cannot die. THG killed me in anger, but I was resurrected immediately per my highlander role. If I am lynched, I resurrect at night. If I am killed by the reds, I resurrect immediately.
In fact, I think the write up lends credence to me being a good guy. Rel shot THG and missed. THG blamed me (a fellow [albeit eventual] good guy). The reds then were the ones that had to take aim at me. They put in a kill with Pavel for me, and it was executed through THG (the bad guy). I ressurect immediately, and THG either can't be killed or has something similar. Thus leading to today's battle .
I think this is the strongest argument beyond my admittedly naked claims, that I am the good Highlander and THG is the bad Highlander.
Why else would a red kill be carried out by THG?