Monsters I: GAME THREAD
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
I wouldn't worry about it. Looks like people have stopped playing the game anyway.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
I'm willing to go with thg...
lynch ulf
lynch ulf
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
Seriously, where are TL, nan, mac ?
Part of me wants to think they're blue just because of their apparent disinterest. And then another part of me says they're laying low. Regardless, it's a bit of a shame.
Part of me wants to think they're blue just because of their apparent disinterest. And then another part of me says they're laying low. Regardless, it's a bit of a shame.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
Well, there's still enough doubt in my mind that ulf is an acceptable vote, and with the lack of participation, I don't know that we will find a much better option. A green just died on a time limit 3-2 vote, though. After openly claiming green. ulf was not in on that vote despite the fact that, at one point, it was 2-1 on ulf. Having played with ulf before when he's bad, I don't think he would have not tied it up at that point in time. And do we really believe that none of the 3 votes on canaan were reds?
I just think we can do more with today than a quick bw on ulf.
I just think we can do more with today than a quick bw on ulf.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
This isn't a quick vote, I told everyone yesterday Ulf was Red and the village ofted for Canaan. You voted Ulf yesterday with me, what changed?Kraftster wrote:Well, there's still enough doubt in my mind that ulf is an acceptable vote, and with the lack of participation, I don't know that we will find a much better option. A green just died on a time limit 3-2 vote, though. After openly claiming green. ulf was not in on that vote despite the fact that, at one point, it was 2-1 on ulf. Having played with ulf before when he's bad, I don't think he would have not tied it up at that point in time. And do we really believe that none of the 3 votes on canaan were reds?
I just think we can do more with today than a quick bw on ulf.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
The sheriff is certainly an unknown.Kraftster wrote:Well, there's still enough doubt in my mind that ulf is an acceptable vote, and with the lack of participation, I don't know that we will find a much better option. A green just died on a time limit 3-2 vote, though. After openly claiming green. ulf was not in on that vote despite the fact that, at one point, it was 2-1 on ulf. Having played with ulf before when he's bad, I don't think he would have not tied it up at that point in time. And do we really believe that none of the 3 votes on canaan were reds?
I just think we can do more with today than a quick bw on ulf.
It's not clear if redwill is red, coy, or limited in what he can say.
Perhaps all of the above.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
I missed two days last week completely because i just couldnt get on lgp at work....i dropped in yesterday hoping someone could give me a quick synopsis of whats going on...but i just got thg's displeasure of my lack of involvement...i'd like to participate but i don't really know what's going on.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
thehockeyguru wrote:This isn't a quick vote, I told everyone yesterday Ulf was Red and the village ofted for Canaan. You voted Ulf yesterday with me, what changed?Kraftster wrote:Well, there's still enough doubt in my mind that ulf is an acceptable vote, and with the lack of participation, I don't know that we will find a much better option. A green just died on a time limit 3-2 vote, though. After openly claiming green. ulf was not in on that vote despite the fact that, at one point, it was 2-1 on ulf. Having played with ulf before when he's bad, I don't think he would have not tied it up at that point in time. And do we really believe that none of the 3 votes on canaan were reds?
I just think we can do more with today than a quick bw on ulf.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
I didn't voice my displeasure, Redwill did. If you don't want to participate thats fine by me. I would like your vote on Ulf though.Troy Loney wrote:I missed two days last week completely because i just couldnt get on lgp at work....i dropped in yesterday hoping someone could give me a quick synopsis of whats going on...but i just got thg's displeasure of my lack of involvement...i'd like to participate but i don't really know what's going on.
In a nutshell I picked out IE on day one, she was Red. I said day 2 Ulf was Red, but the village opted for Canaan who was Green. I am again saying that Ulf is Red. So I'd advise a vote on Ulf.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
thehockeyguru wrote:I didn't voice my displeasure, Redwill did. If you don't want to participate thats fine by me. I would like your vote on Ulf though.Troy Loney wrote:I missed two days last week completely because i just couldnt get on lgp at work....i dropped in yesterday hoping someone could give me a quick synopsis of whats going on...but i just got thg's displeasure of my lack of involvement...i'd like to participate but i don't really know what's going on.
In a nutshell I picked out IE on day one, she was Red. I said day 2 Ulf was Red, but the village opted for Canaan who was Green. I am again saying that Ulf is Red. So I'd advise a vote on Ulf.
Bhaw won the sheriff vote right, and he got killed that night? IE declined the sheriff nomination correct? has a correlation been drawn between those things? Like does accepting the node clear me?
![Popcorn :pop:](./images/smilies/popcorn.gif)
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
in a nutshell.Troy Loney wrote:I missed two days last week completely because i just couldnt get on lgp at work....i dropped in yesterday hoping someone could give me a quick synopsis of whats going on...but i just got thg's displeasure of my lack of involvement...i'd like to participate but i don't really know what's going on.
redwill is sheriff. it is unclear if he is red, independent or helping the village
canaan and ulf defended IE in a vote and she turned out to be red
canaan preemptively declared his role, even without a vote on him and he is now green and dead. (still bizarre, but I was wrong on that one.)
EPP appears to be blue
thg is certain that ulf is red
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
The only thing I am sure of at this point is that Ulf is Red.Troy Loney wrote:thehockeyguru wrote:I didn't voice my displeasure, Redwill did. If you don't want to participate thats fine by me. I would like your vote on Ulf though.Troy Loney wrote:I missed two days last week completely because i just couldnt get on lgp at work....i dropped in yesterday hoping someone could give me a quick synopsis of whats going on...but i just got thg's displeasure of my lack of involvement...i'd like to participate but i don't really know what's going on.
In a nutshell I picked out IE on day one, she was Red. I said day 2 Ulf was Red, but the village opted for Canaan who was Green. I am again saying that Ulf is Red. So I'd advise a vote on Ulf.
Bhaw won the sheriff vote right, and he got killed that night? IE declined the sheriff nomination correct? has a correlation been drawn between those things? Like does accepting the node clear me?
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14876
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:41 pm
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
Look at who I voted with on day 1, before finishing off IE. Then look who I didn't vote for yesterday. I would hope that tells you something.
Kill EPP, because i wanted to on day 1, and he's done nothing to help his cause since.
Color plz.
Kill EPP, because i wanted to on day 1, and he's done nothing to help his cause since.
Color plz.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
columbia wrote:in a nutshell.Troy Loney wrote:I missed two days last week completely because i just couldnt get on lgp at work....i dropped in yesterday hoping someone could give me a quick synopsis of whats going on...but i just got thg's displeasure of my lack of involvement...i'd like to participate but i don't really know what's going on.
redwill is sheriff. it is unclear if he is red, independent or helping the village
canaan and ulf defended IE in a vote and she turned out to be red
canaan preemptively declared his role, even without a vote on him and he is now green and dead. (still bizarre, but I was wrong on that one.)
EPP appears to be blue
thg is certain that ulf is red, and was spot on with IE
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
yellow ulf
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
ulf wrote:Look at who I voted with on day 1, before finishing off IE. Then look who I didn't vote for yesterday. I would hope that tells you something.
Kill EPP, because i wanted to on day 1, and he's done nothing to help his cause since.
Color plz.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14876
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:41 pm
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
![Facepalm :face:](./images/smilies/facepalm.gif)
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
blue ulf
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
blue ulf
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
Imagine that.
jagger columbia. The best bet for a red among the three voters on canaan and no one will get on board with the redwill vote, so lets start there.
jagger columbia. The best bet for a red among the three voters on canaan and no one will get on board with the redwill vote, so lets start there.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
For heaven sake, he can't be the Green Seer because I am.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
Haha, I thought you might be. Do you know he's red?thehockeyguru wrote:For heaven sake, he can't be the Green Seer because I am.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
Please pay attention to who is leading this, if yinz decide to kill me.Kraftster wrote:Imagine that.
jagger columbia. The best bet for a red among the three voters on canaan and no one will get on board with the redwill vote, so lets start there.
![Popcorn :pop:](./images/smilies/popcorn.gif)
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Monsters I: GAME THREAD
yellow ulf