MWB pretty much said he thinks LITT, you and myself are bad....bhaw wrote:If LITT is good this vote will take off - bad for villageMWB wrote:What are you talking about?bhaw wrote:shoot MWB
I have no idea why you would put the village into, and then point out, a no win situation.
If LITT is bad this vote won't go anywhere - no vote doesn't help
There is no plus side to this vote the way you have laid it out. And even more so, if your goal was to gain knowledge of who is bad by seeing how long the vote takes, you ruin any chance of that by specifically pointing out that that is what your intention is.
It's almost indirectly accusing anyone who doesn't vote for LITT.
The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
It would be nice to get your thoughts, Zaro. They have been noticeably absent despite you chiming in every once in a while.
You are someone I have been suspicious of for a while.
You are someone I have been suspicious of for a while.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
To clarify - your increased pop ins without voting or contributing has made you increasingly suspicious. Doing it again is not helping. Need some input from your side.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
save mwb
fire upon zaro
i feel good about that one.
fire upon zaro
i feel good about that one.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Looking at this post, I think it got Troy killed. Bhaw didn't vote for LITT and flipped off of rylan to vote for IE. I admit being wrong on IE, but I was sure she was red. Even now, bhaw won't vote for LITT.Troy Loney wrote:Its a coin flip for me between bhaw and litt.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
fire upon bhaw
You may not feel I have been contributing, but I called out you, troy and canaan for not participating earlier. I even put a vote on you and then you started posting and completely ignored my vote. That is a smooth red play there.
I feel good on this vote.
You may not feel I have been contributing, but I called out you, troy and canaan for not participating earlier. I even put a vote on you and then you started posting and completely ignored my vote. That is a smooth red play there.
I feel good on this vote.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I don't think ps87 and Rylan are RPs, because the last night phase ended pretty early. Of course unless they sent in there votes without participating in the game.bhaw wrote:shoot MWB
I have no idea why you would put the village into, and then point out, a no win situation.
I still believe one of Rylan or ps87 is bad, but MWB is sticking out to me big time.
I also have questions around SDD. If he came back blue and was blue, the reds seem to be killing off the known good guys. Unless they feel SDD is way off, it would reason that they would have killed him by now.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
(2) LITT - (MWB, SDD)
(1) Zaro - (Bhaw)
(1) Bhaw - (Zaro)
4 to Fire Upon
(1) Zaro - (Bhaw)
(1) Bhaw - (Zaro)
4 to Fire Upon
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Hahaha, really? You called me out (I went back to look) Tuesday morning at 7:45 (my time, 10:45 yours). My first post was 12 hours later in the game thread. I guess you can have an indefinite timeline because if my first post would have been Friday, it was still technically after you "called me out." I ignored your vote because there was nothing to address. You said I hadn't posted, which was correct.Zarovich wrote:fire upon bhaw
You may not feel I have been contributing, but I called out you, troy and canaan for not participating earlier. I even put a vote on you and then you started posting and completely ignored my vote. That is a smooth red play there.
I feel good on this vote.
Like I said, if you think I'm the best vote, go for it. But if your justification is that you called me out then I started posting, that's bunk. There was just under 12 full hours (11h 40some min).
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 24978
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
the logic implicating quiet players as RPs because write ups have been taking longer is always spottySam's Drunk Dog wrote:I don't think ps87 and Rylan are RPs, because the last night phase ended pretty early. Of course unless they sent in there votes without participating in the game.bhaw wrote:shoot MWB
I have no idea why you would put the village into, and then point out, a no win situation.
I still believe one of Rylan or ps87 is bad, but MWB is sticking out to me big time.
I also have questions around SDD. If he came back blue and was blue, the reds seem to be killing off the known good guys. Unless they feel SDD is way off, it would reason that they would have killed him by now.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
The game is over. We can't get enough votes. I'm pretty sure Zaro is bad, and my 2nd bet is MWB but I have no way of getting a vote on them since people aren't here. If they are both red, it's impossible.
I guess I'm done b/c arguing or providing evidence is pointless. If 2 reds are participating, it can't happen.
I guess I'm done b/c arguing or providing evidence is pointless. If 2 reds are participating, it can't happen.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 24978
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
im leaning owards mwb. i think they tried to set me up with that troy kill. reading back i dont think SDD is bad, he has been on the kraftster and EPP votes.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
(2) LITT - (MWB, SDD)
(1) Zaro - (Bhaw)
(1) Bhaw - (Zaro)
4 to Fire Upon
deadline is 9PM
(1) Zaro - (Bhaw)
(1) Bhaw - (Zaro)
4 to Fire Upon
deadline is 9PM
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I think it's him and Zaro, tbh. I'm not sure about you, but based on what I'm reading, I think it's those two.Letang Is The Truth wrote:im leaning owards mwb. i think they tried to set me up with that troy kill. reading back i dont think SDD is bad, he has been on the kraftster and EPP votes.
Zaro was 2nd to last vote for EPP, last vote on IE (which he used as a negative for me).
Point being is that if there are 2 bad players left who are participating, a majority can't happen. At best, there are 3 votes on someone and the time runs out and we hit a lucky one. Problem is SDD has to pick the right 2 to align with, as the groundwork has been laid to say that you and I are paired up. As Zaro stated, the fact that I haven't voted for you shows I'm protecting you. In reality, he said LITT and bhaw. I know I'm blue, so I don't trust his instincts on LITT knowing that if he's looking at the same thing for both of us, he's wrong.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Dodge LITT
Fire upon Zaro
I agree with you bhaw. I've been suspicious of Zaro for sometime now. Still not sure who is good or who is bad. But' I'm fine with being wrong to help at least advance the game and put an end to it.
LITT we need you to vote for Zaro so that something happens at the time limit.
Fire upon Zaro
I agree with you bhaw. I've been suspicious of Zaro for sometime now. Still not sure who is good or who is bad. But' I'm fine with being wrong to help at least advance the game and put an end to it.
LITT we need you to vote for Zaro so that something happens at the time limit.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I really hope SDD isn't bad. That post wreaks of red, but since you're new, I almost want to ignore it.
Hopefully I'm right.
Hopefully I'm right.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I know I'm blue. I have no idea what anyone else is at this point.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I'm banking on probability with you. The circumstances that would have to take place for you to be bad:
1. you were viewed and came back blue
2. the rules were set up so a red comes back as blue (alpha)
3. in your first game ever, you are the 1/20 that is picked as the alpha
4. you play a really solid game for your first game as the leader of the red team
Statistics say that the odds of this happening are so low, I'm ok with being on your side.
1. you were viewed and came back blue
2. the rules were set up so a red comes back as blue (alpha)
3. in your first game ever, you are the 1/20 that is picked as the alpha
4. you play a really solid game for your first game as the leader of the red team
Statistics say that the odds of this happening are so low, I'm ok with being on your side.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Can someone explain to me why General Meade hasn't made any night kills?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
lol... i was seriously about to bring up the vig.Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:Can someone explain to me why General Meade hasn't made any night kills?
Considering this is potentially the last vote, we should figure out who he is. Eliminate 1 person.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
LOL. If this isn't the biggest red sucking up to an outed blue ever, then someone show me.bhaw wrote:I'm banking on probability with you. The circumstances that would have to take place for you to be bad:
1. you were viewed and came back blue
2. the rules were set up so a red comes back as blue (alpha)
3. in your first game ever, you are the 1/20 that is picked as the alpha
4. you play a really solid game for your first game as the leader of the red team
Statistics say that the odds of this happening are so low, I'm ok with being on your side.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
(2) Zaro - (Bhaw, Zaro)
(1) LITT - (MWB)
(1) Bhaw - (Zaro)
4 to Fire Upon
deadline is 9PM
(1) LITT - (MWB)
(1) Bhaw - (Zaro)
4 to Fire Upon
deadline is 9PM
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I wouldn't need to push to hard as a red at this point. There's very minimal opportunity for blue.Zarovich wrote:LOL. If this isn't the biggest red sucking up to an outed blue ever, then someone show me.bhaw wrote:I'm banking on probability with you. The circumstances that would have to take place for you to be bad:
1. you were viewed and came back blue
2. the rules were set up so a red comes back as blue (alpha)
3. in your first game ever, you are the 1/20 that is picked as the alpha
4. you play a really solid game for your first game as the leader of the red team
Statistics say that the odds of this happening are so low, I'm ok with being on your side.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
If you haven't figured it out, I'm not sure what to say. That's part of why I think both you and litt are bad. Also, I still say that if litt were blue, the game would be done.bhaw wrote:lol... i was seriously about to bring up the vig.Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:Can someone explain to me why General Meade hasn't made any night kills?
Considering this is potentially the last vote, we should figure out who he is. Eliminate 1 person.