The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I feel better about voting either bhaw or litt. I think it's pretty telling that they're both pushing for the quiet people or the noob (sdd) right now.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Just checked that vote, ps87 was second, IE fifth and rylan sixth on that vote. I don't see the EPP vote clearing IE and rylan. Any of them could be bad imo.Troy Loney wrote:not really. look at the initial vote. ps87 went after epp early on and so did IE. so if you refuse to vote for anyone but those three, you should go with rylan. the only thing throwing a wrench into that, is if one of them was columbia's partner that got darksided when we killed his ***.bhaw wrote:If IE, rylan, or ps87 aren't going to talk, I think they need to be killed. If we miss, that means the reds don't have to do anything and the game may never end.
Question is, who is the best of those 3?
ps87 has nothing to go on, rylan has nearly nothing, ie talked at the beginning but hasn't voted in a while. It sucks b/c it's basically a random guess.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
like i said, I'm blue. So killing me doesn't kill off a green, but it won't help.Troy Loney wrote:I feel better about voting either bhaw or litt. I think it's pretty telling that they're both pushing for the quiet people or the noob (sdd) right now.
I don't know what part of my logic is bad for the village. At the end of the day, feel free to take me out, but it's an uphill battle with no participation from 1/2 the players.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 24978
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
this statement is a self fulfilling prophecy. if we were quiet you would say that you feel better about our vote because were quiet. you think we are bad because we are stating what we think may be happening. and your justification for the vote on me is that i have been quiet too and dropping in when there is a vote which seems a little contradictory.Troy Loney wrote:I feel better about voting either bhaw or litt. I think it's pretty telling that they're both pushing for the quiet people or the noob (sdd) right now.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Columbia vote from earlier:
So the people left who didn't vote for Columbia are IE, Rylan, MWB, ps87, and SDD. I stated that I wanted to vote for Columbia, but the vote didn't happen when I as around. SDD couldn't be the brother, unless he came back as blue in that event as well (very unlikely). I think IE, Rylan or ps87 is the other mason. Unfortunately, as others have said, with so little history from each of them it's hard to tell. If it's one of those three, I still think it's IE. PS87 has just two posts, both votes. Rylan had a bunch of posts early, then nothing for basically a week. I don't think that would happen if he had a role.thehockeyguru wrote:
(6) - Columbia - (Bhaw, Kraftster, Slappy, TL, Zaro, TWC, LITT)
(1) - Slappy - (SDD)
7 to Fire Upon
Deadline at 8PM
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
This comes across as pretty red though.Letang Is The Truth wrote:reading back thru, kraftster had a post that contained this
with sdd coming back blue and the red leader still out there, would it possible that he was throwing this out there to take heat off SDD at the time when people were gingerly discussing him?SDD seems to be too out in the open to have a role, imo.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
And there's also this.Letang Is The Truth wrote:we said the same with redwill thothe wicked child wrote:fire upon kraftster
Don't believe it was a coincidence that he was "protected".
The more I read LITT's post, the more suspicious he seems. He's eager to push the IE angle, maybe because he knows others will go for it as well. Also maybe why he put a fairly early vote on her this phase, thinking it would take off quickly.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 24978
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
thats a reach. i was early on the redwill vote because i saw the protection as him being red. i thought it was a good vote. when he came back blue, i didnt want people to rush into a vote on a protected person because it happened once before and they came back blue. just want to encourage people to see what is going on and obeserve teh pattern cuz maybe there was something protecting a sect of blues?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I have no idea who to vote for but I feel we should vote for someone who hasn't been participating so the game moves along better. People also need to start putting in a vote.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I'm going to go off the columbia vote and say LITT likely isn't red. For all the reds knew, if the last vote was red, the consequences of killing columbia would have affected them and not the blue side. That's a big risk for a red to take to be the last vote when it could have been a bomb or something like that. Columbia specifically warned that whoever killed him would get a disadvantage. Just my thoughts on LITT and looking at the columbia vote.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
That was the first vote on Kraftster, and this was also in the middle of the whole columbia thing, so it's very unlikely that any vote was going to take off.Letang Is The Truth wrote:thats a reach. i was early on the redwill vote because i saw the protection as him being red. i thought it was a good vote. when he came back blue, i didnt want people to rush into a vote on a protected person because it happened once before and they came back blue. just want to encourage people to see what is going on and obeserve teh pattern cuz maybe there was something protecting a sect of blues?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
hmm, i guess he was 6th out of 7. Forgot that was a deadline, not a limit reached vote.
Logic still stands. I think the village would have gotten the brother if the last voter was red. Up for discussion though.
Logic still stands. I think the village would have gotten the brother if the last voter was red. Up for discussion though.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I see what you're saying, but I took columbia's claim all along to be that if he was voted off, it would help the reds and if he was killed by reds, it would help the greens. In that line of thinking, it's even more damning to LITT. If he also thought that way, it would have been an incentive to have him kill off columbia as a red.bhaw wrote:I'm going to go off the columbia vote and say LITT likely isn't red. For all the reds knew, if the last vote was red, the consequences of killing columbia would have affected them and not the blue side. That's a big risk for a red to take to be the last vote when it could have been a bomb or something like that. Columbia specifically warned that whoever killed him would get a disadvantage. Just my thoughts on LITT and looking at the columbia vote.
shoot litt
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Good point. after looking at the vote, i do see it as more incriminating for LITT.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
My take on the remaining players:
1. IrishEyes - unsure. seems possibly bad because of lack of participation and desire to stay under radar. possibly columbia's brother.
2. Zarovich - no idea
3. Rylan - burst of participation at the start, then nothing. probably blue
4. bhaw - no idea
5. MWB - good
6. Troy Loney - probably good given his early vote on kraftster
7. Letang Is The Truth - probably bad
8. pittsports87 - two posts, both votes... who knows
9. Sam's Drunk Dog - cleared as blue. could be red leader, however, also put in a first vote on kraftster earlier in the game. very unlikely columbia's brother.
1. IrishEyes - unsure. seems possibly bad because of lack of participation and desire to stay under radar. possibly columbia's brother.
2. Zarovich - no idea
3. Rylan - burst of participation at the start, then nothing. probably blue
4. bhaw - no idea
5. MWB - good
6. Troy Loney - probably good given his early vote on kraftster
7. Letang Is The Truth - probably bad
8. pittsports87 - two posts, both votes... who knows
9. Sam's Drunk Dog - cleared as blue. could be red leader, however, also put in a first vote on kraftster earlier in the game. very unlikely columbia's brother.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 24978
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
how do you know how the vote would work on columbia? his answers gave no indication about what would happen, just that he could be green or redMWB wrote:I see what you're saying, but I took columbia's claim all along to be that if he was voted off, it would help the reds and if he was killed by reds, it would help the greens. In that line of thinking, it's even more damning to LITT. If he also thought that way, it would have been an incentive to have him kill off columbia as a red.bhaw wrote:I'm going to go off the columbia vote and say LITT likely isn't red. For all the reds knew, if the last vote was red, the consequences of killing columbia would have affected them and not the blue side. That's a big risk for a red to take to be the last vote when it could have been a bomb or something like that. Columbia specifically warned that whoever killed him would get a disadvantage. Just my thoughts on LITT and looking at the columbia vote.
shoot litt
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
shoot everyone
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I bolded the parts in my post to show it's speculation, not that I know how it would have turned out.Letang Is The Truth wrote:how do you know how the vote would work on columbia? his answers gave no indication about what would happen, just that he could be green or redMWB wrote:I see what you're saying, but I took columbia's claim all along to be that if he was voted off, it would help the reds and if he was killed by reds, it would help the greens. In that line of thinking, it's even more damning to LITT. If he also thought that way, it would have been an incentive to have him kill off columbia as a red.bhaw wrote:I'm going to go off the columbia vote and say LITT likely isn't red. For all the reds knew, if the last vote was red, the consequences of killing columbia would have affected them and not the blue side. That's a big risk for a red to take to be the last vote when it could have been a bomb or something like that. Columbia specifically warned that whoever killed him would get a disadvantage. Just my thoughts on LITT and looking at the columbia vote.
shoot litt
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Anyone have a count? THG?
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
(2) IE - (LITT, SDD)
(2) LITT - (Troy,MWB)
(1) Rylan - (Bhaw)
Did it myself.
(2) LITT - (Troy,MWB)
(1) Rylan - (Bhaw)
Did it myself.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
yeah, people who have refrained from voting need to actually participate this time.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
IE hasn't posted in the game thread since columbia was killed but has posted elsewhere. I really do believe she is the other mason.
fire upon IE
fire upon IE
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
My only hesitation in voting for ie is that litt also voted for her. So probably just one is bad.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
unless u bad...MWB wrote:My only hesitation in voting for ie is that litt also voted for her. So probably just one is bad.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Strongbad checking the email.