newarenanow wrote:Which ps87 post are you guys talking about?
I'm talking about the one where he responded to kraftster and mwb saying that he's between me and gaucho.
newarenanow wrote:Which ps87 post are you guys talking about?
You are what you....nevermind.newarenanow wrote:I just think he is a giant vagina.the wicked child wrote:I think he's sober and trying to act drunk.Malkamaniac wrote:Shad is just throwing out votes in hopes that it sticks. I think he's pretty drunk.
I'm talking about these:columbia wrote:My reading of that was that slappy was making some random/absurd comments and he was responding in kind.
That was the genesis of it all.
Gaucho wrote:You called me Fritz. U R dead.
Gaucho wrote:Very clever. Somebody killed slappy, knowing that suspicion would fall on me.
Something about it doesn't seem right to me.Gaucho wrote:Gaucho wrote:You called me Fritz. U R dead.
I'd be really stupid to kill slappy now, though, wouldn't I?
Point has been awarded to NAN.newarenanow wrote:I just think he is a giant vagina.the wicked child wrote:I think he's sober and trying to act drunk.Malkamaniac wrote:Shad is just throwing out votes in hopes that it sticks. I think he's pretty drunk.
Shad, I didn't claim you were sober, I think it's just funny that you've switched 3 times now in the span of 20 minutes.shafnutz05 wrote:I originally jumped on the TL bandwagon. The way he is reacting, I simply don't think he is the best vote right now.the wicked child wrote:I think he's sober and trying to act drunk.Malkamaniac wrote:Shad is just throwing out votes in hopes that it sticks. I think he's pretty drunk.
DocEmrick hasn't contributed anything aside from three or four cryptic posts that only DocEmrick can understand. Since that didn't stick, I went with PS87, because I am pretty confident that I believe in TL's innocence.
Not "throwing out votes"
shafnutz05 wrote:You are what you....nevermind.newarenanow wrote:I just think he is a giant vagina.the wicked child wrote:I think he's sober and trying to act drunk.Malkamaniac wrote:Shad is just throwing out votes in hopes that it sticks. I think he's pretty drunk.
raffiniert? i dont know what that is, but im not voting for you just because of your use of itGaucho wrote:Since I know how lynch mobs work I would certainly not be so stupid as to draw everyone's attention to me in such an obvious way if I were bad. That would be a really retarded way to prove how clever and brilliant and raffiniert I am. So if you think I'm a complete moron, vote for me.
In the last game I killed shaf (sorry about that), because I had to kill one of the good ones and the way shaf was acting, he HAD to be one of the good ones. Meaning: he was very talkative and didn't seem worried about what he was saying, as if he had nothing to hide. The reason for his behavior being: he had nothing to hide. That simple.
I used it first, it means "clever".canaan wrote:raffiniert? i dont know what that is, but im not voting for you just because of your use of itGaucho wrote:Since I know how lynch mobs work I would certainly not be so stupid as to draw everyone's attention to me in such an obvious way if I were bad. That would be a really retarded way to prove how clever and brilliant and raffiniert I am. So if you think I'm a complete moron, vote for me.
In the last game I killed shaf (sorry about that), because I had to kill one of the good ones and the way shaf was acting, he HAD to be one of the good ones. Meaning: he was very talkative and didn't seem worried about what he was saying, as if he had nothing to hide. The reason for his behavior being: he had nothing to hide. That simple.
Haha. I don't think you're a complete moron, but I'm still voting for you. It's not so much about what you did, but what the reaction was.Gaucho wrote:Since I know how lynch mobs work I would certainly not be so stupid as to draw everyone's attention to me in such an obvious way if I were bad. That would be a really retarded way to prove how clever and brilliant and raffiniert I am. So if you think I'm a complete moron, vote for me.
Naturally, the same could be said of you in this case....But that's what makes these games interesting, eh.redwill wrote: The way I see it, the baddies are always looking for reasons to jump on someone they know is not bad.
Pretty great point.redwill wrote:Haha. I don't think you're a complete moron, but I'm still voting for you. It's not so much about what you did, but what the reaction was.Gaucho wrote:Since I know how lynch mobs work I would certainly not be so stupid as to draw everyone's attention to me in such an obvious way if I were bad. That would be a really retarded way to prove how clever and brilliant and raffiniert I am. So if you think I'm a complete moron, vote for me.
The way I see it, the baddies are always looking for reasons to jump on someone they know is not bad. You gave them a good reason, but no one jumped. In fact, several players came out to defend you. That leads me to believe that maybe they didn't jump on you because you're one of them. Anyway, I think it's good enough for a vote right now.
How so?columbia wrote:Naturally, the same could be said of you in this case....redwill wrote: The way I see it, the baddies are always looking for reasons to jump on someone they know is not bad.
You saw an "opportunity" - no matter how thin - jump on him as a baddie and you took it.redwill wrote:How so?columbia wrote:Naturally, the same could be said of you in this case....redwill wrote: The way I see it, the baddies are always looking for reasons to jump on someone they know is not bad.
Uh ... two other players had 4 votes on them. Gaucho had 1. That's a jump?columbia wrote:You saw an "opportunity" - no matter how thin - jump on him as a baddie and you took it.
Its funny how often this happens.columbia wrote:You saw an "opportunity" - no matter how thin - jump on him as a baddie and you took it.redwill wrote:How so?columbia wrote:Naturally, the same could be said of you in this case....redwill wrote: The way I see it, the baddies are always looking for reasons to jump on someone they know is not bad.
im not saying this is you in this case, but ive purposely voted on a random person as a baddy to deflect away from the idea that "baddies bandwagon", so anythings possible.redwill wrote:Uh ... two other players had 4 votes on them. Gaucho had 1. That's a jump?columbia wrote:You saw an "opportunity" - no matter how thin - jump on him as a baddie and you took it.