***BEER WARS GAME THREAD***

[Troy Loney]

Which ps87 post are you guys talking about?

I'm talking about the one where he responded to kraftster and mwb saying that he's between me and gaucho.

[shafnutz05]

Shad is just throwing out votes in hopes that it sticks. I think he's pretty drunk.

I think he's sober and trying to act drunk.

I just think he is a giant vagina.

You are what you....nevermind.

[the wicked child]

My reading of that was that slappy was making some random/absurd comments and he was responding in kind.
That was the genesis of it all.

I'm talking about these:

You called me Fritz. U R dead.

Very clever. Somebody killed slappy, knowing that suspicion would fall on me.

You called me Fritz. U R dead.

I'd be really stupid to kill slappy now, though, wouldn't I?

Something about it doesn't seem right to me.

[the wicked child]

Shad is just throwing out votes in hopes that it sticks. I think he's pretty drunk.

I think he's sober and trying to act drunk.

I just think he is a giant vagina.

Point has been awarded to NAN.

[canaan]

nan wins the internet for today

[the wicked child]

intoxicate Gaucho

Going with my beer gut for the time being.

[Malkamaniac]

Shad is just throwing out votes in hopes that it sticks. I think he's pretty drunk.

I think he's sober and trying to act drunk.

I originally jumped on the TL bandwagon. The way he is reacting, I simply don't think he is the best vote right now.

DocEmrick hasn't contributed anything aside from three or four cryptic posts that only DocEmrick can understand. Since that didn't stick, I went with PS87, because I am pretty confident that I believe in TL's innocence.

Not "throwing out votes"

Shad, I didn't claim you were sober, I think it's just funny that you've switched 3 times now in the span of 20 minutes.

[newarenanow]

Shad is just throwing out votes in hopes that it sticks. I think he's pretty drunk.

I think he's sober and trying to act drunk.

I just think he is a giant vagina.

You are what you....nevermind.

[redwill]

Sorry I wasn't around at all yesterday. I was traveling without any internets.

I like the Gaucho vote, too. What I find most interesting is the deflecting that seems to be happening off of Gaucho. He should have had some votes on him a lot earlier based on what he did. If he turns up red, it will cast an interesting light on several players, IMO.

intoxicate Gaucho

[beerman]

Vote Count:

Troy - 4 (nan, mac, canaan, Malk)
ps87 - 4 (Troy, bhaw, shaf, columbia)
Gaucho - 2 (twc, redwill)

[beerman]

it takes 10 to kill

[doublem]

drunk ps87 to death.

[Gaucho]

Since I know how lynch mobs work I would certainly not be so stupid as to draw everyone's attention to me in such an obvious way if I were bad. That would be a really retarded way to prove how clever and brilliant and raffiniert I am. So if you think I'm a complete moron, vote for me.

In the last game I killed shaf (sorry about that), because I had to kill one of the good ones and the way shaf was acting, he HAD to be one of the good ones. Meaning: he was very talkative and didn't seem worried about what he was saying, as if he had nothing to hide. The reason for his behavior being: he had nothing to hide. That simple.

[beerman]

Vote Count:

ps87 - 5 (Troy, bhaw, shaf, columbia, doublem)
Troy - 4 (nan, mac, canaan, Malk)
Gaucho - 2 (twc, redwill)

[canaan]

Since I know how lynch mobs work I would certainly not be so stupid as to draw everyone's attention to me in such an obvious way if I were bad. That would be a really retarded way to prove how clever and brilliant and raffiniert I am. So if you think I'm a complete moron, vote for me.

In the last game I killed shaf (sorry about that), because I had to kill one of the good ones and the way shaf was acting, he HAD to be one of the good ones. Meaning: he was very talkative and didn't seem worried about what he was saying, as if he had nothing to hide. The reason for his behavior being: he had nothing to hide. That simple.

raffiniert? i dont know what that is, but im not voting for you just because of your use of it

[shafnutz05]

Since I know how lynch mobs work I would certainly not be so stupid as to draw everyone's attention to me in such an obvious way if I were bad. That would be a really retarded way to prove how clever and brilliant and raffiniert I am. So if you think I'm a complete moron, vote for me.

In the last game I killed shaf (sorry about that), because I had to kill one of the good ones and the way shaf was acting, he HAD to be one of the good ones. Meaning: he was very talkative and didn't seem worried about what he was saying, as if he had nothing to hide. The reason for his behavior being: he had nothing to hide. That simple.

raffiniert? i dont know what that is, but im not voting for you just because of your use of it

I used it first, it means "clever".

[shafnutz05]

Still virtually zero input from the following:

Doc, ulf

[redwill]

Since I know how lynch mobs work I would certainly not be so stupid as to draw everyone's attention to me in such an obvious way if I were bad. That would be a really retarded way to prove how clever and brilliant and raffiniert I am. So if you think I'm a complete moron, vote for me.

Haha. I don't think you're a complete moron, but I'm still voting for you. It's not so much about what you did, but what the reaction was.

The way I see it, the baddies are always looking for reasons to jump on someone they know is not bad. You gave them a good reason, but no one jumped. In fact, several players came out to defend you. That leads me to believe that maybe they didn't jump on you because you're one of them. Anyway, I think it's good enough for a vote right now.

[columbia]

The way I see it, the baddies are always looking for reasons to jump on someone they know is not bad.

Naturally, the same could be said of you in this case....But that's what makes these games interesting, eh.

[Kraftster]

Since I know how lynch mobs work I would certainly not be so stupid as to draw everyone's attention to me in such an obvious way if I were bad. That would be a really retarded way to prove how clever and brilliant and raffiniert I am. So if you think I'm a complete moron, vote for me.

Haha. I don't think you're a complete moron, but I'm still voting for you. It's not so much about what you did, but what the reaction was.

The way I see it, the baddies are always looking for reasons to jump on someone they know is not bad. You gave them a good reason, but no one jumped. In fact, several players came out to defend you. That leads me to believe that maybe they didn't jump on you because you're one of them. Anyway, I think it's good enough for a vote right now.

Pretty great point.
intoxicate Gaucho

[redwill]

The way I see it, the baddies are always looking for reasons to jump on someone they know is not bad.

Naturally, the same could be said of you in this case....

How so?

[columbia]

The way I see it, the baddies are always looking for reasons to jump on someone they know is not bad.

Naturally, the same could be said of you in this case....

How so?

You saw an "opportunity" - no matter how thin - jump on him as a baddie and you took it.

[redwill]

You saw an "opportunity" - no matter how thin - jump on him as a baddie and you took it.

Uh ... two other players had 4 votes on them. Gaucho had 1. That's a jump?

[Kraftster]

The way I see it, the baddies are always looking for reasons to jump on someone they know is not bad.

Naturally, the same could be said of you in this case....

How so?

You saw an "opportunity" - no matter how thin - jump on him as a baddie and you took it.

Its funny how often this happens.

For example, earlier Troy remarked that ps87 was eager to find a target, too eager. In the same post, Troy finds himself a nice target, somewhat eagerly.

redwill makes a very good point about how long Gaucho has held on with no votes, when he could have been an easy target for the baddies. Meanwhile, redwill just got on the scene and goes right for Gaucho, and he could have orchestrated the entire delay.

[canaan]

You saw an "opportunity" - no matter how thin - jump on him as a baddie and you took it.

Uh ... two other players had 4 votes on them. Gaucho had 1. That's a jump?

im not saying this is you in this case, but ive purposely voted on a random person as a baddy to deflect away from the idea that "baddies bandwagon", so anythings possible.