Surprisingly, it was.Eismann wrote:The Office was good last night.
TV Shows
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: TV Shows
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8027
- Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:47 pm
- Location: Hamilton
Re: TV Shows
LMFAO the "real" ambiguously gay duo
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12037
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:33 pm
- Location: Forever in blue jeans
Re: TV Shows
I dont care how stupid that was. That was awesome.Physical_Graffiti wrote:LMFAO the "real" ambiguously gay duo
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12037
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:33 pm
- Location: Forever in blue jeans
Re: TV Shows
Speaking of shows that were gunned down before their prime..
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 18334
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:40 pm
- Location: http://DrunkInAGraveyard.com
Re: TV Shows
yeah, that could have gone on for at least another 10 mins, and it would have been fine with me. how the hell is Paul Simon supposed to follow THAT?DudeMan2766 wrote:I dont care how stupid that was. That was awesome.Physical_Graffiti wrote:LMFAO the "real" ambiguously gay duo
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16216
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
- Location: Dead and Without Love
Re: TV Shows
Just finished the first season of Archer. I absolutely love this show.
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8027
- Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:47 pm
- Location: Hamilton
Re: TV Shows
Wasn't JT supposed to host?
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6643
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:53 am
Re: TV Shows
Surprised that NBC axed Outsourced. I thought it deserved a second season.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10156
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: Arlington House, Arlington, Virginia
Re: TV Shows
Killing = intriguing
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:11 pm
Re: TV Shows
Thats 5 hours a week less of production costs for new shows. They can show the news at ten and local affiliates can sell ads during reruns of seinfeld or some other show that will probably get better ratings at 11 or 11:30 than a new show would at ten.Chefpatrick871 wrote:What I completely fail to understand about Fox is, they still stop programing after 9 pm so they can have the FIRST NEWS at 10. Yeah because I can't get my news anytime any day via this crazy new thing called the internet. That is 5 hours of programing that is completely wasted.
Thank god the Steelers play on CBS, I am now avoiding Fox like the plague.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: TV Shows
My opinion has been varied on SNL recently.
Two weeks ago, I thought the entire show was fantastic from start to finish. The Michael Bolton Lonely Island video just topped it off, but I laughed the entire time.
This weekend, I thought it was terrible. I like Ed Helms, but man, he was rough in his first appearance. I also greatly enjoy Paul Simon, but those performances were awful. I understand wanting to showcase your new stuff, but you will be 70 this year dude. PLAY ONE OLD SONG AT LEAST.
Two weeks ago, I thought the entire show was fantastic from start to finish. The Michael Bolton Lonely Island video just topped it off, but I laughed the entire time.
This weekend, I thought it was terrible. I like Ed Helms, but man, he was rough in his first appearance. I also greatly enjoy Paul Simon, but those performances were awful. I understand wanting to showcase your new stuff, but you will be 70 this year dude. PLAY ONE OLD SONG AT LEAST.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6532
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:56 pm
- Location: Not saying I'm at your mom's house, not saying I'm not.
Re: TV Shows
I dunno about that, 10 pm is a prime tv time, and with cable channels now producing good dramas(TNT, USA, A&E, AMC etc. etc.), you'd think Fox would want to make an attempt to keep up.Nuge wrote:Thats 5 hours a week less of production costs for new shows. They can show the news at ten and local affiliates can sell ads during reruns of seinfeld or some other show that will probably get better ratings at 11 or 11:30 than a new show would at ten.Chefpatrick871 wrote:What I completely fail to understand about Fox is, they still stop programing after 9 pm so they can have the FIRST NEWS at 10. Yeah because I can't get my news anytime any day via this crazy new thing called the internet. That is 5 hours of programing that is completely wasted.
Thank god the Steelers play on CBS, I am now avoiding Fox like the plague.
And as for the 5 hours less production costs, how bout 5 hours of 3/4 less viewers.
But hey, Idol and Glee are still on
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 18334
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:40 pm
- Location: http://DrunkInAGraveyard.com
Re: TV Shows
I'm a bit late to the party on this one, but I recently started watching The Shield starting from the beginning. Enjoying it more than I thought I would.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: TV Shows
Good to see it is coming back for one more season. I absolutely love this show.eddysnake wrote: http://www.deadline.com/2011/05/its-off ... -episodes/
Sucks it's only going to be 13 episodes.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: TV Shows
Survivor...
Spoiler:
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: TV Shows
i got really annoyed at phillip doing the, "being a crazy jerk idiot was just a tactic" shtick. he's a jag. gameplay had nothing to do with itrelantel wrote:Survivor...Spoiler:
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6532
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:56 pm
- Location: Not saying I'm at your mom's house, not saying I'm not.
Re: TV Shows
Castle, holy crap
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: TV Shows
Quick question. Does it seem like there are a lot more TV shows that are shortlived and cancelled pretty quickly today?
When I was a kid, and maybe it was because I didn't really pay attention, but it seemed like shows were more likely to stay on the air, and there weren't so many cancelled shows, where the plug was pulled so quickly.
Now that networks are announcing their fall lineups, it seems like most of the new shows that came out this year are not coming back, and many are cancelled after just a few episodes.
Could it be because:
1) Instead of like in the past where shows were full season, and ran from Sept to May, there are many mid season shows/ or partial season, so there are a lot more new shows that have a chance to fail.
2) Because of #1, most people have no idea when their favorite shows are on (that are new) and when they can view them
3) Shows that do not fair well immediately are moved around the weekly calendar and are hard to find?
4) Reality shows are cheaper to produce, so it is easy to axe a sitcome or drama with higher costs if it does not perform well immediately
It just seems like some shows you start warming up to are gone and each and every year, there are just a few long term shows, and the rest just come and go. I read yesterday where I think NBC had no new returning sitcoms from the this year returning, and that 80% of their shows they release each year fail and do not make a second season. And it seems like it is like that for most networks.
When I was a kid, and maybe it was because I didn't really pay attention, but it seemed like shows were more likely to stay on the air, and there weren't so many cancelled shows, where the plug was pulled so quickly.
Now that networks are announcing their fall lineups, it seems like most of the new shows that came out this year are not coming back, and many are cancelled after just a few episodes.
Could it be because:
1) Instead of like in the past where shows were full season, and ran from Sept to May, there are many mid season shows/ or partial season, so there are a lot more new shows that have a chance to fail.
2) Because of #1, most people have no idea when their favorite shows are on (that are new) and when they can view them
3) Shows that do not fair well immediately are moved around the weekly calendar and are hard to find?
4) Reality shows are cheaper to produce, so it is easy to axe a sitcome or drama with higher costs if it does not perform well immediately
It just seems like some shows you start warming up to are gone and each and every year, there are just a few long term shows, and the rest just come and go. I read yesterday where I think NBC had no new returning sitcoms from the this year returning, and that 80% of their shows they release each year fail and do not make a second season. And it seems like it is like that for most networks.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12103
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:23 pm
- Location: tool shed
Re: TV Shows
I taped it last night, but your is getting me excited to watch it tonight.Chefpatrick871 wrote:Castle, holy crap
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: TV Shows
Chefpatrick871 wrote:Castle, holy crap
still 5 eps behind (maybe 6 now). I think the one we just watched was very early in DWTS.
It's a good thing many shows are coming to season finales - we'll need much of the summer just to catch up. Blasted DWTS has taken a lot out of our normal viewing patterns, though I suspect we won't watch future seasons of it since Hines was the lure. (Heck, we still have 8 eps of NUMB3RS to go, and that was cancelled March 2010). Though IPS and LO:CI have started back up, but at least that is fewer stuff in the pipeline. As it is, we have to watch an hour already recorded to be able to record the next one. Well, there are a couple hours leeway but not much. We'd have to watch an hour show backlogged late one night in order for a new one to record the next night. Or Friday/Sat, we had to watch 2-3 hrs worht to record the Survivor finale.
In other shows, we did catch up on CSI last night - Sunday we thought we were watching the 2nd part of a 2-part episode... only to find out
Spoiler:
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:11 pm
Re: TV Shows
Anybody watch How I Met Your Mother? I thought this season as a whole was pretty solid.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: TV Shows
I thought HIMYM fell off a little bit this season, but I'm interested in next season based on what we saw last night.Nuge wrote:Anybody watch How I Met Your Mother? I thought this season as a whole was pretty solid.
Spoiler:
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: TV Shows
I watched it. I thought this season was decent.Nuge wrote:Anybody watch How I Met Your Mother? I thought this season as a whole was pretty solid.
Spoiler:
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: TV Shows
this season was good, but ted still remains the least likable main character that a really good show has ever produced.newarenanow wrote:I watched it. I thought this season was decent.Nuge wrote:Anybody watch How I Met Your Mother? I thought this season as a whole was pretty solid.
I think it has 2 more good seasons left in it.Spoiler:
Spoiler:
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:11 pm
Re: TV Shows
I think next season will be pretty good but any seasons after that will probably be subpar.shmenguin wrote:this season was good, but ted still remains the least likable main character that a really good show has ever produced.newarenanow wrote:I watched it. I thought this season was decent.Nuge wrote:Anybody watch How I Met Your Mother? I thought this season as a whole was pretty solid.
I think it has 2 more good seasons left in it.Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler: