jwienand wrote:I get to work and 2 die???
I'm also feeling tfrizz and jays.
Pavel is an interesting case. Would the jellies want to put a target on his back if he were a baddie by offing redwill? Or are they trying to get us to turn on him? I'm holding onto my vote for a bit till some more people chime in.
OK...let me give a quick explanation on my actions yesterday...
tfrizz threw an interesting theory out there, and while some people had a feeling it was just a villager on villager thing, I didn't. I looked at the evidence and really, when I thought about it...it seemed solid. And, you know me, when I feel like something is pretty solid I push for it. Typically that gets me in trouble, but, hey, at least you can say I tried. I was wrong on PFiDC yesterday...I don't like the way the write-up was worded. He could very much be a convert now. It's not something that we should go for now, it's something to put on the backburner.
As for Pavel...
the redwill killing is a total framejob, I believe. Either Pavel is good, or there are two mafias (and to answer your question from before, there have been two mafias the past few games, jdubs) and he's bad and the other mafia doesn't know that. Personally, with the way the write-ups are written, I'm leaning towards one bigger mafia instead of two. So, I think Pavel is good and the mafia is trying to use our suspicions of him from yesterday against him today...
I absolutely did not like the following:
At 10:26
tfrizz wrote:That is true... it's a little too obvious for redwill to be killed if Pavel was bad. It's a common bad guy move that never works.
At 10:41
tfrizz wrote:net Pavel Bure
He's a very good player, and whether he is purposely quiet or just isn't around it doesn't help the resort whatsoever. He is more of a risk than an asset IMO.
So, in the span of 15 minutes, tfrizz is convinced Pavel is good and then he votes for him? All amidst the Canaan/Wallflower stuff....super shady.
net tfrizz