IrishEyes wrote:Regarding PFIDC; I realize that people think he's been a selfish player in the past, it's not something I remember all that well, but I really don't believe he's petty enough to off jaysmiter because of the argument they had. Doesn't mean I have any idea whether he's a good guy or a bad guy, I just don't see the jaysmiter killing as indicative of PFIDC's role (or non-role) in the game.
I'm NOT a selfish player, and I still offed redwill because of an argument in a previous game. Just sayin'.
I mentioned it yesterday, but I'll mention it again... I will be leaving for work shortly. I have 2 meetings today, so my participation during work hours may be limited to checking in on my phone during lunch.
I was just going to list those two, Troy has been unusually quiet and thg.
Nan came out with this at friday 3:00 pm board time....the first writeup was at 10:00 am friday board time....i came out and said i was busy and not really playing yet....nan gets killed in the writeup last night and two people come out and vote for me cause of this....I was around last night and responded to the votes, LITT questioned me a little bit, then i went back and found a post by him throwing out my name and pfidc...two players who had connections with the dead people....that seemed to me like an attempt to get the village to keep talking about those connections, and trying to keep our names out there....and in retrospect that seems like an obvious play for the goons...killing nan is smart because he is good at getting the village to trust him, plus he's the vig, and he's thrown some names out that the village will have to question....
I was just going to list those two, Troy has been unusually quiet and thg.
Nan came out with this at friday 3:00 pm board time....the first writeup was at 10:00 am friday board time....i came out and said i was busy and not really playing yet....nan gets killed in the writeup last night and two people come out and vote for me cause of this....I was around last night and responded to the votes, LITT questioned me a little bit, then i went back and found a post by him throwing out my name and pfidc...two players who had connections with the dead people....that seemed to me like an attempt to get the village to keep talking about those connections, and trying to keep our names out there....and in retrospect that seems like an obvious play for the goons...killing nan is smart because he is good at getting the village to trust him, plus he's the vig, and he's thrown some names out that the village will have to question....
i'm sticking with my first instinct in this game... my first instinct last game was malks and we almost voted him off early in the game, then he came back and destroyed the village with a very good play late in the game. now my first instinct is beerman and i'm not going to back down from that one...
count2infinity wrote:i'm sticking with my first instinct in this game... my first instinct last game was malks and we almost voted him off early in the game, then he came back and destroyed the village with a very good play late in the game. now my first instinct is beerman and i'm not going to back down from that one...
Nan came out with this at friday 3:00 pm board time....the first writeup was at 10:00 am friday board time....i came out and said i was busy and not really playing yet....nan gets killed in the writeup last night and two people come out and vote for me cause of this....I was around last night and responded to the votes, LITT questioned me a little bit, then i went back and found a post by him throwing out my name and pfidc...two players who had connections with the dead people....that seemed to me like an attempt to get the village to keep talking about those connections, and trying to keep our names out there....and in retrospect that seems like an obvious play for the goons...killing nan is smart because he is good at getting the village to trust him, plus he's the vig, and he's thrown some names out that the village will have to question....
IrishEyes wrote:
Regarding PFIDC; I realize that people think he's been a selfish player in the past, it's not something I remember all that well, but I really don't believe he's petty enough to off jaysmiter because of the argument they had. Doesn't mean I have any idea whether he's a good guy or a bad guy, I just don't see the jaysmiter killing as indicative of PFIDC's role (or non-role) in the game.
I really think there is nothing behind the PFiDC/ jaysmiter killing. All that happened was that someone died. People question other people all the time then die, but we don't go after who they've questioned.
count2infinity wrote:i'm sticking with my first instinct in this game... my first instinct last game was malks and we almost voted him off early in the game, then he came back and destroyed the village with a very good play late in the game. now my first instinct is beerman and i'm not going to back down from that one...
Whats your evidence on Beerman?
he has said nothing of significance other than
he made the comment "i guess you don't mess with jesus" which leads me to believe he's trying to make the village think pfidc had something to do with jay's death
finally, i brought up his name and magically he decided to join in the conversation, albeit only to say that he needs to read what's been going on.
count2infinity wrote:i'm sticking with my first instinct in this game... my first instinct last game was malks and we almost voted him off early in the game, then he came back and destroyed the village with a very good play late in the game. now my first instinct is beerman and i'm not going to back down from that one...
Whats your evidence on Beerman?
he has said nothing of significance other than
he made the comment "i guess you don't mess with jesus" which leads me to believe he's trying to make the village think pfidc had something to do with jay's death
finally, i brought up his name and magically he decided to join in the conversation, albeit only to say that he needs to read what's been going on.
I can get onboard with that if we dont have enough votes for LITT.
The problem at this moment is too many people have votes on me. I run my mouth, then I get voted. Now I try and keep quiet a bit and I get votes. Seems like a lose lose to me.
thehockeyguru wrote:The problem at this moment is too many people have votes on me. I run my mouth, then I get voted. Now I try and keep quiet a bit and I get votes. Seems like a lose lose to me.
thehockeyguru wrote:The problem at this moment is too many people have votes on me. I run my mouth, then I get voted. Now I try and keep quiet a bit and I get votes. Seems like a lose lose to me.
It will pass the as the memory of your fail last game fades from the collective conscience. Shaf was MVP last game after a similar experience.
thehockeyguru wrote:The problem at this moment is too many people have votes on me. I run my mouth, then I get voted. Now I try and keep quiet a bit and I get votes. Seems like a lose lose to me.
It will clear up the third game. I had to learn the hard way too.
Troy Loney wrote:Nan came out with this at friday 3:00 pm board time....the first writeup was at 10:00 am friday board time....i came out and said i was busy and not really playing yet....nan gets killed in the writeup last night and two people come out and vote for me cause of this....I was around last night and responded to the votes, LITT questioned me a little bit, then i went back and found a post by him throwing out my name and pfidc...two players who had connections with the dead people....that seemed to me like an attempt to get the village to keep talking about those connections, and trying to keep our names out there....and in retrospect that seems like an obvious play for the goons...killing nan is smart because he is good at getting the village to trust him, plus he's the vig, and he's thrown some names out that the village will have to question....
use periods
Excessive ellipsis makes me angry. You're now on my short list of people getting the stink eye via the interweb.
As for the business of voting, I have no real reason to vote for THG or LITT, but I don't have any real evidence to present on someone else to actually expect to sway the votes. After writing that I checked the thread and noticed a beerman vote. I'm going to get in on that because of the "evidence" listed by count2infinity and myself, jokingly a few pages early. It's very slight but like I said, I have nothing on the other two. Also, I haven't played a game with count2infinity yet, and I'm hoping by siding with him he'll be my friend and we can go to the movies and stuff.
thehockeyguru wrote:The problem at this moment is too many people have votes on me. I run my mouth, then I get voted. Now I try and keep quiet a bit and I get votes. Seems like a lose lose to me.
thehockeyguru wrote:The problem at this moment is too many people have votes on me. I run my mouth, then I get voted. Now I try and keep quiet a bit and I get votes. Seems like a lose lose to me.
to put me in a better mood!
