Man the South East is a bad division.....
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2462
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:30 pm
Man the South East is a bad division.....
Just saying. Almost not fair giving a 3rd seed to the winner of that division. The NHL needs to do just straight seeding. That division is almost double digit worse that every other division.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:32 pm
- Location: Wilmington, NC
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
Canes are looking well. They had a rough start and are actually coming around now.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:13 pm
- Location: A flute with no holes, is not a flute. A donut with no hole, is a Danish
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
One might say they where "Staaled" out of the gateffemtreed wrote:Canes are looking well. They had a rough start and are actually coming around now.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 21107
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:40 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA - @MichaelFarkasHF
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
If you change the format because a division looks bad for some time...what happens when the ebb and flow of sports takes effect and the divisions even out? It's "unfair" that we have to play in a stacked division...but what happens if in 5 years it's just us and the Islanders and the rest of those teams blow? Will we not get the #3 seed? I'm not saying it for any other reason then: if you tinker on short-term trends, you create long-term issues sometimes...
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
It comes down to the fact that Canaduan teams are always going to be more likely to ice champions than anyone from the SE. ;)
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6954
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: right behind you
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
Right, I mean look at how many cups the Leafs have won compared to TBL and CAR since those teams were foundedcolumbia wrote:It comes down to the fact that Canaduan teams are always going to be more likely to ice champions than anyone from the SE.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2462
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:30 pm
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
mikey287 wrote:If you change the format because a division looks bad for some time...what happens when the ebb and flow of sports takes effect and the divisions even out? It's "unfair" that we have to play in a stacked division...but what happens if in 5 years it's just us and the Islanders and the rest of those teams blow? Will we not get the #3 seed? I'm not saying it for any other reason then: if you tinker on short-term trends, you create long-term issues sometimes...
Valid point, but do we really think the SE is ever going to rival the Atlantic?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16216
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
- Location: Dead and Without Love
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
Yes.MarioLives wrote:mikey287 wrote:If you change the format because a division looks bad for some time...what happens when the ebb and flow of sports takes effect and the divisions even out? It's "unfair" that we have to play in a stacked division...but what happens if in 5 years it's just us and the Islanders and the rest of those teams blow? Will we not get the #3 seed? I'm not saying it for any other reason then: if you tinker on short-term trends, you create long-term issues sometimes...
Valid point, but do we really think the SE is ever going to rival the Atlantic?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
SE has delivered two Champions in the last decade, Atlantic has delivered 1. Just sayin. Interestingly, coaches of all 3 of those winners are now coaching in the Atlantic.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1362
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:33 am
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
The Canes and Lightning would lead the North West if it wasn't for Vancouver.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:00 am
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
Capitals: Last in the league standings, 7 points out of final playoff spot 6 points from being 3rd in conference.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2462
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:30 pm
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
I guesse we can agree to disagree on that one. I think it is more likely the SE loses 1 if not 2 of those teams before they every rival the Atlantic. No one cares about hockey in Florida or Carolina......not to mention Tampa Bay is not that great a town either.Rylan wrote:Yes.MarioLives wrote:mikey287 wrote:If you change the format because a division looks bad for some time...what happens when the ebb and flow of sports takes effect and the divisions even out? It's "unfair" that we have to play in a stacked division...but what happens if in 5 years it's just us and the Islanders and the rest of those teams blow? Will we not get the #3 seed? I'm not saying it for any other reason then: if you tinker on short-term trends, you create long-term issues sometimes...
Valid point, but do we really think the SE is ever going to rival the Atlantic?
Tampa 21st in attendance
Florida 23rd
Carolina 26th
Based on last year.....
None of them have been above 20 in the last 5 years.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 19694
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:11 pm
- Location: BOBROVSKY!!!
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
That's if you look strictly at numbers, and your numbers are wrong. Tampa was 7th in average attendance with 19,204. Carolina was 15th.
Percentage-wse, Florida is 9th in the league, with 100.4% attendance. Carolina and Tampa are each at 97+.
Where are you getting your numbers?
EDIT: Those are this year's numbers, from what I just posted
Last year:
Tampa: 13th in average
Carolina: 22nd
Florida: 21st
I see now, you're using last year's %.
And yet, they're still higher than New Jersey (avg attendance/game, and they're only right above in %) and the Islanders.
Percentage-wse, Florida is 9th in the league, with 100.4% attendance. Carolina and Tampa are each at 97+.
Where are you getting your numbers?
EDIT: Those are this year's numbers, from what I just posted
Last year:
Tampa: 13th in average
Carolina: 22nd
Florida: 21st
I see now, you're using last year's %.
And yet, they're still higher than New Jersey (avg attendance/game, and they're only right above in %) and the Islanders.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
As a hockey town, Tampa is about identical to Pittsburgh. Winning they sell out, losing they don't. In fact, they were 4000 behind Pittsburgh last year in attendance.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 7:41 pm
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
He or she would be spelling stall wrong.darkstar57 wrote:One might say they where "Staaled" out of the gateffemtreed wrote:Canes are looking well. They had a rough start and are actually coming around now.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 2:28 pm
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
What makes Tampa a viable hockey market is that it has a relatively high number of Canadian retirees and seasonal (winter) residents. While they attend games, they aren't necessarily Lightning fans first and foremost.
The indigenous market alone, roughly the same size as Pittsburgh, probably wouldn't support a franchise.
There are other factors as important as attendance, such as cultural penetration of the game and team, city/state buy-in, avg GDP of the population, league strategy, etc.. For example, Miami is an important market for the league in terms of exposure and mind share.
The indigenous market alone, roughly the same size as Pittsburgh, probably wouldn't support a franchise.
There are other factors as important as attendance, such as cultural penetration of the game and team, city/state buy-in, avg GDP of the population, league strategy, etc.. For example, Miami is an important market for the league in terms of exposure and mind share.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7028
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 12:54 pm
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
Horatio Cain style!darkstar57 wrote:One might say they where "Staaled" out of the gateffemtreed wrote:Canes are looking well. They had a rough start and are actually coming around now.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 1:33 pm
- Location: You know, it's just not death with dignity if there's an Estevez in the room
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
mikey287 wrote:If you change the format because a division looks bad for some time...what happens when the ebb and flow of sports takes effect and the divisions even out? It's "unfair" that we have to play in a stacked division...but what happens if in 5 years it's just us and the Islanders and the rest of those teams blow? Will we not get the #3 seed? I'm not saying it for any other reason then: if you tinker on short-term trends, you create long-term issues sometimes...
The Flyers will never blow. They have been good from the start of the franchise and have had only one real down period in their history (89-90 to 93-94). Sure they have had a few down years in between (like the one year where we won every game againiat them) but have had only one period of time where they were terrible like how we were from 01-02 to 05-06. Plus even when they weren't cup contenders, they were still good enough to make the playoffs.
Granted that's just one team, but i'm just saying I can't ever see a time where the Flyers are God awful for a period of time.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3048
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:07 am
- Location: Cobb Mountain, CA
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
It would just demonstrate that the top team/division seeding first idea is not good.mikey287 wrote:If you change the format because a division looks bad for some time...what happens when the ebb and flow of sports takes effect and the divisions even out? It's "unfair" that we have to play in a stacked division...but what happens if in 5 years it's just us and the Islanders and the rest of those teams blow? Will we not get the #3 seed? I'm not saying it for any other reason then: if you tinker on short-term trends, you create long-term issues sometimes...
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2462
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:30 pm
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
Every team but one in the NE has more points than the SE leader
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16216
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
- Location: Dead and Without Love
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
ok...its still a myopic view.MarioLives wrote:Every team but one in the NE has more points than the SE leader
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 19694
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:11 pm
- Location: BOBROVSKY!!!
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
What about the Atlantic?MarioLives wrote:Every team but one in the NE has more points than the SE leader
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 2543
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 10:42 pm
- Location: Inside Crosby's basement dryer
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
really annoying me because i live around DC and cant stand the Caps. They are awful and still have a shot to win the dvision after a horrible start. This division is a joke
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: Man the South East is a bad division.....
i'd be in favor of a permanent adjustment to split up the trash from the SE, but only if there was the right kind of evidence to say it needed to be done. basically, i would need attendance numbers to be low enough, for a long enough period of time that these teams were regularly forced to spend towards the cap floor. but that isn't really happening. they're trying to field competitive teams, and generally are spending enough money to do so - it's just coincidence that they suck at it, not some indication that the SE is permanently screwed.