![Image](http://i403.photobucket.com/albums/pp111/jaysmiter/have_a_sassy_saturday-6483.gif)
redwill is!
Somebody's on a crusade.redwill wrote:I'll wager that wallflower has had more input into this game than dagny has.redwill wrote:I'll take dagny's response as a "no."redwill wrote:So do you have any real game-related input?
You know, I predicted to my dog Grasshopper that you would respond exactly like that.dagny wrote:However, with nothing for me to go on right now, your attitude is a good start.
I don't move every weekend. This happens to be the one I am moving. (Aren't you excited for me!!!??? Finally! I get my life back!)jaysmiter wrote:dagny wrote:
I have lots of time on the weekend, but some people want it locked.
So, which is it?dagny wrote:
Now that he has, I'm moving today. I have time to check in, but not much time for posting, right now.
I understand the context of your current vote. I just think the 3rd/4th voter theory is bad, as I pointed out soon after you originally stated it. Now that you continue to push it I think you may have ulterior motives. If I had more than that I'd say it, but I don't, so I'm going with what I've got, much like you are.redwill wrote:Well, I'll admit that it is a theory better suited to Days 1 or 2. I only keep bringing it up to place my current vote in context.MWB wrote:pin redwill
Basically because I don't like the theory that he keeps bringing up.
For example, if I had just said, "pin Malkamaniac," then I guarantee that some folks would come out and say things like "Why are you just lynching Malka for no reason???!!" Or if I had gone for Zarovich instead, some -- perhaps brilliant followers of thg -- would probably have said what he said: "What do people have on Zarovich?" Nevermind that I spent four or five posts on it only four pages back. That's the nature of things in this game.
In any case, I'd love to hear your input. That is, your input beyond a vague dislike of my apparently dislikeable theory.
The problem is, there's no one left that's historically quiet or inactive, with the possible exception of Hockeynut.dagny wrote: With no solid evidence, the only thing that makes sense to me, is to take out non/low actives. But I hesitate even bringing it up because we always say we're gonna do this, and we don't.
Which is why I said whoever has the least amount of posts. With nothing else to go on, and the objective to vote out a "quiet" player, that's the most practical method I can think of.MWB wrote:The problem is, there's no one left that's historically quiet or inactive, with the possible exception of Hockeynut.dagny wrote: With no solid evidence, the only thing that makes sense to me, is to take out non/low actives. But I hesitate even bringing it up because we always say we're gonna do this, and we don't.
Malkamaniac wrote:At this point it's time to get the non actives out. There needs to Be follow through and no back pedaling when someone finally comes in after a few days and says oh hays I'm here just don't know what to say! It hurts the village and is totally counterproductive. Typing on a cell phone is ridiculous.
I promise not to overlook it once I parse it.dagny wrote:Malkamaniac wrote:At this point it's time to get the non actives out. There needs to Be follow through and no back pedaling when someone finally comes in after a few days and says oh hays I'm here just don't know what to say! It hurts the village and is totally counterproductive. Typing on a cell phone is ridiculous.![]()
Let this post not be overlooked!
Dude...I don't think you, or anyone, has to worry about getting killed until like Monday around noon-1pm. No one is going to be playing tonight and tomorrow is Valentine's Day and chicks dig that *charcoal*...so...I'd relax on casting votes at this point.Hockeynut! wrote:Just in case I get killed tonight:
Pin bhaw
Mainly because he went psycho on me last game and accused me of setting him up, leading to me being killed by the assassin.
redwill wrote:I'll wager that wallflower has had more input into this game than dagny has.
Har har. Cat pic from the peanut gallery.wallflower wrote:cat pic
I apologize.redwill wrote:Har har. Cat pic from the peanut gallery.wallflower wrote:cat pic
Who d'ya think you are, LITT?
What has happened?bhaw wrote:I'll probably change my vote tomorrow, but I'm liking going after the people who are pushing bad theories:
redwill - I get how you are rationalizing your vote, but more has happened since then, so I would think you'd have come up with more