The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Forum for NHR "Wars" Games
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15747
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by MWB »

mac5155 wrote:Wait 7pm deadline?


Ugh. If this is true, you're gonna want to remove your votes from me.
columbia
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 51889
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by columbia »

That doesn't do it for me...

Who have you investigated?
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15747
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by MWB »

This could be a beneficial kill even if it so happens that mac is the seer. Mac's last post before the deadline was at 4:07. SDD then took his vote off redwill. Redwill then switched his vote to mac. Soon after, slappy (switching from redwill) and columbia voted for mac. So what had been a vote in favor of redwill, 4-1, changed to a 4-2 vote in favor of mac just before the 7pm deadline. At least one of those (SDD, columbia, redwill, and slappy) is bad if mac is good.
mac5155
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 48700
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
Location: governor of Fayettenam

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by mac5155 »

SDD is blue. Wanted to get a new player first. Relantel was my investigate last night, as I've said many times I was suspicious of him. That's all I got. Didn't say this earlier bc I didn't realize 7pm was the deadline. I went to the bucco game and checked in. Give me at least another night phase and day for someone to dispute my claim. Guarantee you no one will. You have nothing to gain by killing me
mac5155
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 48700
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
Location: governor of Fayettenam

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by mac5155 »

How is it beneficial to kill the seer on day 2 again?
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15747
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by MWB »

mac5155 wrote:How is it beneficial to kill the seer on day 2 again?
It isn't beneficial to lose the seer, but that doesn't mean we can't get a red through how that vote broke down.
columbia
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 51889
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by columbia »

Modgate?
mac5155
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 48700
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
Location: governor of Fayettenam

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by mac5155 »

MWB wrote:
mac5155 wrote:How is it beneficial to kill the seer on day 2 again?
It isn't beneficial to lose the seer, but that doesn't mean we can't get a red through how that vote broke down.
The angel is presumably still our there. They can protect me and I can investigate until they find him/her
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15747
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by MWB »

mac5155 wrote:
MWB wrote:
mac5155 wrote:How is it beneficial to kill the seer on day 2 again?
It isn't beneficial to lose the seer, but that doesn't mean we can't get a red through how that vote broke down.
The angel is presumably still our there. They can protect me and I can investigate until they find him/her
Not sure what your point is. My vote is off you. however, usually a deadline is the end of the vote even if a mod isn't around. Trying to be proactive if nothing can change and see what we get out of this vote.
mac5155
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 48700
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
Location: governor of Fayettenam

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by mac5155 »

My point is killing the seer to say one of four people might be bad is a dumb idea
redwill
AHL All-Star
AHL All-Star
Posts: 7342
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by redwill »

mac5155 wrote:My point is killing the seer to say one of four people might be bad is a dumb idea
There are seers and then there are seers.

This bus has sailed.

Let's have it, thg.
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15747
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by MWB »

I guess my point is just going over your head. Not sure how else to explain, but I'll try.
1. Losing seer bad.
2. We shouldn't vote for claimed seer.
3. If that's a done deal, we can learn something from it.

Not really sure why you're insisting that I, or others, want the seer dead so we can find a red.
mac5155
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 48700
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
Location: governor of Fayettenam

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by mac5155 »

redwill wrote:
mac5155 wrote:My point is killing the seer to say one of four people might be bad is a dumb idea
There are seers and then there are seers.

This bus has sailed.

Let's have it, thg.
You're better than that.
columbia
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 51889
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by columbia »

MWB wrote:This could be a beneficial kill even if it so happens that mac is the seer. Mac's last post before the deadline was at 4:07. SDD then took his vote off redwill. Redwill then switched his vote to mac. Soon after, slappy (switching from redwill) and columbia voted for mac. So what had been a vote in favor of redwill, 4-1, changed to a 4-2 vote in favor of mac just before the 7pm deadline. At least one of those (SDD, columbia, redwill, and slappy) is bad if mac is good.
One of the other 3 might be red, but that particular voting pattern doesn't prove it.
bhaw
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 28740
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by bhaw »

lol, oh balls... just noticed this game started.

Mac = seer is what I gathered from the last couple pages. Why is no one unvoting him? He may be red, but it's stupid to take that gamble right now.
bhaw
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 28740
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by bhaw »

shoot redwill

Just to make sure we at least have a tie.
columbia
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 51889
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by columbia »

I assume that it only be redwill, assuming that thg sticks to his 7 pm deadline and nullifies the votes afterwards.
columbia
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 51889
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by columbia »

Is this going to be some sort of hanging chads scenario? :scared: Is this going to be some sort of hanging chads scenario?
mac5155
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 48700
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
Location: governor of Fayettenam

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by mac5155 »

What is the 7pm deadline make this phase, only about 7 hours? I'm on my phone and it's hard to find the last write up
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15747
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by MWB »

A tie would be the worst case scenario.
Kill redwill
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15747
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by MWB »

Write up was at 9:44 am
bhaw
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 28740
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by bhaw »

columbia wrote:I assume that it only be redwill, assuming that thg sticks to his 7 pm deadline and nullifies the votes afterwards.
If mods not be around, I would consider it fair game to continue voting. No one has said to stop voting.

PS - My role is George Washington, leader of the colonist army that travels forward in time to help the union army defeat the confederacy. :pop: It is also my job to ensure Abe Lincoln only gets his face on the penny. If he gets the nickle or dime, the union loses. :scared:
redwill
AHL All-Star
AHL All-Star
Posts: 7342
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by redwill »

MWB wrote:I guess my point is just going over your head. Not sure how else to explain, but I'll try.
1. Losing seer bad.
2. We shouldn't vote for claimed seer.
3. If that's a done deal, we can learn something from it.

Not really sure why you're insisting that I, or others, want the seer dead so we can find a red.
To whom is this directed?
bhaw
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 28740
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by bhaw »

it was directed at mac.
mac5155
NHL Second Liner
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 48700
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
Location: governor of Fayettenam

Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**

Post by mac5155 »

Is my vote on liTT at the moment? If so please

Save LITT
Bomb redwill

And color me plz