mac5155 wrote:Wait 7pm deadline?
Ugh. If this is true, you're gonna want to remove your votes from me.
The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
That doesn't do it for me...
Who have you investigated?
Who have you investigated?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
This could be a beneficial kill even if it so happens that mac is the seer. Mac's last post before the deadline was at 4:07. SDD then took his vote off redwill. Redwill then switched his vote to mac. Soon after, slappy (switching from redwill) and columbia voted for mac. So what had been a vote in favor of redwill, 4-1, changed to a 4-2 vote in favor of mac just before the 7pm deadline. At least one of those (SDD, columbia, redwill, and slappy) is bad if mac is good.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
SDD is blue. Wanted to get a new player first. Relantel was my investigate last night, as I've said many times I was suspicious of him. That's all I got. Didn't say this earlier bc I didn't realize 7pm was the deadline. I went to the bucco game and checked in. Give me at least another night phase and day for someone to dispute my claim. Guarantee you no one will. You have nothing to gain by killing me
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
How is it beneficial to kill the seer on day 2 again?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
It isn't beneficial to lose the seer, but that doesn't mean we can't get a red through how that vote broke down.mac5155 wrote:How is it beneficial to kill the seer on day 2 again?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
The angel is presumably still our there. They can protect me and I can investigate until they find him/herMWB wrote:It isn't beneficial to lose the seer, but that doesn't mean we can't get a red through how that vote broke down.mac5155 wrote:How is it beneficial to kill the seer on day 2 again?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Not sure what your point is. My vote is off you. however, usually a deadline is the end of the vote even if a mod isn't around. Trying to be proactive if nothing can change and see what we get out of this vote.mac5155 wrote:The angel is presumably still our there. They can protect me and I can investigate until they find him/herMWB wrote:It isn't beneficial to lose the seer, but that doesn't mean we can't get a red through how that vote broke down.mac5155 wrote:How is it beneficial to kill the seer on day 2 again?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
My point is killing the seer to say one of four people might be bad is a dumb idea
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
There are seers and then there are seers.mac5155 wrote:My point is killing the seer to say one of four people might be bad is a dumb idea
This bus has sailed.
Let's have it, thg.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I guess my point is just going over your head. Not sure how else to explain, but I'll try.
1. Losing seer bad.
2. We shouldn't vote for claimed seer.
3. If that's a done deal, we can learn something from it.
Not really sure why you're insisting that I, or others, want the seer dead so we can find a red.
1. Losing seer bad.
2. We shouldn't vote for claimed seer.
3. If that's a done deal, we can learn something from it.
Not really sure why you're insisting that I, or others, want the seer dead so we can find a red.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
You're better than that.redwill wrote:There are seers and then there are seers.mac5155 wrote:My point is killing the seer to say one of four people might be bad is a dumb idea
This bus has sailed.
Let's have it, thg.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
One of the other 3 might be red, but that particular voting pattern doesn't prove it.MWB wrote:This could be a beneficial kill even if it so happens that mac is the seer. Mac's last post before the deadline was at 4:07. SDD then took his vote off redwill. Redwill then switched his vote to mac. Soon after, slappy (switching from redwill) and columbia voted for mac. So what had been a vote in favor of redwill, 4-1, changed to a 4-2 vote in favor of mac just before the 7pm deadline. At least one of those (SDD, columbia, redwill, and slappy) is bad if mac is good.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
lol, oh balls... just noticed this game started.
Mac = seer is what I gathered from the last couple pages. Why is no one unvoting him? He may be red, but it's stupid to take that gamble right now.
Mac = seer is what I gathered from the last couple pages. Why is no one unvoting him? He may be red, but it's stupid to take that gamble right now.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
shoot redwill
Just to make sure we at least have a tie.
Just to make sure we at least have a tie.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I assume that it only be redwill, assuming that thg sticks to his 7 pm deadline and nullifies the votes afterwards.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Is this going to be some sort of hanging chads scenario? Is this going to be some sort of hanging chads scenario?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
What is the 7pm deadline make this phase, only about 7 hours? I'm on my phone and it's hard to find the last write up
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
A tie would be the worst case scenario.
Kill redwill
Kill redwill
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Write up was at 9:44 am
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
If mods not be around, I would consider it fair game to continue voting. No one has said to stop voting.columbia wrote:I assume that it only be redwill, assuming that thg sticks to his 7 pm deadline and nullifies the votes afterwards.
PS - My role is George Washington, leader of the colonist army that travels forward in time to help the union army defeat the confederacy. It is also my job to ensure Abe Lincoln only gets his face on the penny. If he gets the nickle or dime, the union loses.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
To whom is this directed?MWB wrote:I guess my point is just going over your head. Not sure how else to explain, but I'll try.
1. Losing seer bad.
2. We shouldn't vote for claimed seer.
3. If that's a done deal, we can learn something from it.
Not really sure why you're insisting that I, or others, want the seer dead so we can find a red.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
it was directed at mac.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Is my vote on liTT at the moment? If so please
Save LITT
Bomb redwill
And color me plz
Save LITT
Bomb redwill
And color me plz