Daniel wrote: ↑Thu Aug 15, 2024 6:32 pm
dark_forces wrote: ↑Thu Aug 15, 2024 1:35 pm
Daniel wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2024 9:06 pm
FLPensFan wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2024 7:23 pm
Daniel wrote: ↑Wed Aug 14, 2024 6:42 pm
While I think that's how it should be, that's not how Sullivan seems to operate. Young players can't just be given a couple of weeks to outperform a veteran, they need time to develop if they have nothing to prove in the AHL. Too many times a player will make a mistake and never see the NHL again. Every other young player sees that and plays tight. Some can overcome it, but when was the last rookie the team drafted who played more than a few games? Simon? You can hide a kid on the 3rd/4th line and give him a few months to see the improvement. You can't just give them 3 games at 8 minutes per game and hope they can do well. The Penguins setup a lot of young players to fail then wonder why they do.
Dubas talks about the core being here to teach the new guys. What they should be doing, is taking a strong defensively responsible center like Eller, put him as the 3C, and flank him with 2 young guys. Let them make mistakes and learn from them, as opposed to making a mistake and getting Lafferty'd out of town.
Teach the news guys what? Dubas has gotten a bunch of veterans. I agree, Eller and Hayes can be flanked by 3 or 4 from WBS and allow them a few months to get acclimated. I don’t think they should be gifted spots, but several compete for the spots and see who wins the spot, if someone forces their way to the top 6, even better. The new players Dubas got won’t really move the needle much and for the most part they are what they are.
I, for one, don't mind what Dubas has done. While the core is a year older, the supporting cast should have solid depth and better competition than last season. But, I'm naturally an optimist.
I remember Craig Patrick was big on players with limited term, or one year left on their contracts because they tended to play harder for another contract.
Other than Lizotte, who should be a lock on the 4th line, I don't think anything is owed to any of the bottom-six/depth forwards.
Hayes and Glass were basically pawned off on us; Puustinen, Poulin, and Bemstrom are nowhere near locks to even make the final roster (although I think Puustinen does make it), Beauvillier is likely on his last chance at being an NHL regular, Nieto may never play another game for the Pens, Eller probably won't finish the season on our roster, and Acciari will probably be no worse than a 12th forward. What I like is the competition. 1) it'll be much better than last camp. 2) in the event of injuries, there are players that can slot in and fill out the bottom six, and do so reliably.
The only issue I have with what Dubas has done is that it's too much and too late and still no room for organizational growth. Each deal has been really good, but the sum of the parts aren't a playoff team and if it's not a playoff team, why not just have several kids throughout the lineup?
I think NHL teams can shelter 1-2 rookies and allow them to grow but the Penguins have a full roster year in and year out and the only competition is between non waiver exempt players with the loser getting cut. In the end I like Dubas and think he's done a good job, it's just frustrating to see 24-25 veterans competing with no chance for a waiver exempt player to make the squad. If the Penguins were cup contenders it would be one thing, but they haven't been in several years.
I'm not drinking the kool aid, but every single one of the players seem to think they have a chance, that they can easily be better than they were last year, and that the slow start to the season really sunk them. Of course, what else are they going to say.
If I wanted to make an argument for hope of sneaking into the playoffs
--The PP MUST be better
--Karlsson needs to be better; Graves needs to be markedly better
--DOC needs to evolve to a 20 goal scorer to offset some of the loss of Guentzel; Rakell needs to return to form and have an up year.
I think those are the 3 biggest things (really 5, but hey). I do think this years collection of 20 bottom 6 forwards is better than last years collection of bottom 6 forwards, simply because they are younger and more of them play a Sullivan style of fast and aggressive forecheck. Without touching on the 3 items above, I think the team will be in trouble if:
--They have to lean more on Hayes and Eller at center than Lizotte and Glass.
--Any injuries, or multiple injuries, to the top 6 will really water down the lineup quickly.
--Sullivan continues to pound square pegs like Hayes and Acciari into the lineup over younger guys, even when Hayes and Acciari play average at best for a stretch of games.
That last one is a big item for me with the direction of this team. Yes, a veteran should probably have a little longer of a leash to work his way out of a slump, but, Sullivan needs to read the room and the direction of this team. Lean more towards the younger lineup over guys like Hayes, Eller, and Acciari, who are not part of the future of this team beyond next season.