Matt Cooke hit on Tyson Barrie

Forum for hockey posts that are not Penguins-related.
shoeshine boy
ECHL'er
ECHL'er
Posts: 1679
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:44 am
Location: me, 3 years Super League

Re: Matt Cooke hit on Tyson Barrie

Post by shoeshine boy »

Staggy wrote:7 games per McKenzie
really thought he'd get more. I guess that's the NHL's way of saying, "if you weren't Matt Cooke you wouldn't get anything but since you are....."
shmenguin
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 25041
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm

Re: Matt Cooke hit on Tyson Barrie

Post by shmenguin »

7 is ok. he's a special case and deserves harsher punishment than everyone else.
MayIsForHockey
Junior 'A'
Junior 'A'
Posts: 433
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:19 am

Re: Matt Cooke hit on Tyson Barrie

Post by MayIsForHockey »

Beveridge wrote:Cooke isn't considered a repeat offender, correct? I thought once you went X amount of time under the new CBA, you lose repeat offender status.
I think this "clean slate after 18 months" only relates to how players lose salary when suspended. And, I think it works like this:

On an initial 2-game suspension, a player loses 2 days of salary - the two game days.
If suspended a second time in 18 months, the player loses pay for the number of calendar days needed to complete the suspension. So, if it takes 4 days to complete a 2-game suspension, a player would lose twice as much salary.

I don't know how this works in the playoffs, when players only get bonus money, not salary.
relantel
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 17885
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
Location: The card table

Re: Matt Cooke hit on Tyson Barrie

Post by relantel »

If that was worth 7, than the Blues should be crying foul about Seabrook's 3.