Benny Fitz wrote:i jumped on relantel for what i considered to be out of character play.
Benny Fitz wrote:Rel voting for shad seems odd, he used to be the guy that never supported early day 1 bandwagons...
The thing is, he didn't hop on the bandwagon that was started on dodint by shaf. In fact, he voted for the guy that started the Day 1 bandwagon. I almost voted for shaf then as well, based on the same suspicion I'm guessing rel had.
Benny Fitz wrote:Then columbia lends his probability comments seemingly in rel's defense. Only not just as a mere suggestion but, as others have said, to the point of suspicion. Consider his possible motives for doing so.
Ulf and WK, you'll be able to further develop your case on columbia once you find out what he may have been protecting.
As I said in my last post, he, rel and I were red last game. His defense of rel really seems to me to be a covert way of 'proving' himself to not be red this game without appearing too self defensive.
Benny Fitz wrote:Rel's been a good sport about his impending fate, so lets see what's behind door #1 and hit the ground running next day phase with 4 pages of day 1 banter.
If you are advocating we switch to rel, I'll just say that I really have no suspicion of him at this point. I have no intention of voting out someone I don't feel is red just to move things along, as long as I feel there is a better vote available.