Seriously, I hope now, this game is not the last memory for the USA -NHL guys in the Olympics.
The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 35917
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:29 pm
- Location: Pingvin na vsyu zhizn
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
Spoiler:
Seriously, I hope now, this game is not the last memory for the USA -NHL guys in the Olympics.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10182
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 8:12 am
- Location: Putin's mom's house.
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
Gaucho wrote:Sounds like a 6-5 win for Sweden would be ideal.Tico Rick wrote:I'd like to see Kunitz score 5 goals to shut up the Canadian media. Barring that, I'd like to see Sweden win, just so I can pay back my Canadian friend who's been harassing me for the past 24 hours.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12633
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:07 pm
- Location: "Enough is enough!" - Mike Sullivan
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
Face plant?bhaw wrote:More like a pivot.Idoit40fans wrote:Was it a step back or a set back.
Extreme, I know.
Gallows humor is what I resort to when the disappointment yields to resignation of what's done is done.
Last edited by Lt. Dish on Sat Feb 22, 2014 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:56 pm
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
I was traveling and wasn't able to watch either the semifinal or the bronze-medal game, but from what I've heard, it's hard to lay too much blame on the coaching staff (or the players, really). Before the tournament, if you had said that the US would lose a hard-fought, one-goal game to Canada in the semis, most US fans would have likely acknowledged that that was a reasonable result for this team, not something to get incredibly bent out of shape over. Canada is still more talented, even if the gap has shrunk and the US was playing better in the tournament up to that game.
The Finland result is obviously more discouraging, but it's a tough emotional turnaround from playing and losing a close game against your biggest rival to playing a consolation game less than 24 hours later against a team that's hard to hate.
I don't think you can draw too many negative conclusions about the overall direction of USA hockey or Bylsma's coaching ability from this, other than the fact that we can't beat Canada in big games yet.
The Finland result is obviously more discouraging, but it's a tough emotional turnaround from playing and losing a close game against your biggest rival to playing a consolation game less than 24 hours later against a team that's hard to hate.
I don't think you can draw too many negative conclusions about the overall direction of USA hockey or Bylsma's coaching ability from this, other than the fact that we can't beat Canada in big games yet.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 9:43 am
- Location: Finland
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
largegarlic: "...it's a tough emotional turnaround from playing and losing a close game against your biggest rival to playing a consolation game less than 24 hours later against a team that's hard to hate."
Like a one goal loss to archrival and neightbouring nation, the Sweden?
It falls on the coach to get his team ready. "We couldn't get to our game" is getting very old. One should ask, why weren't they?
A headcoach can't escape responsibility every time his team loses in a big game, and always come up with this very same excuse.
What did he do trying to avoid this situation? Why weren't they able to get into the game? I mean, HE KNOWS, YOU KNOW, I KNOW that they weren't able to get into the game. But he's the head coach and he's supposed to do something about it. He's just portraying the problem every time, over and over again. Until the next time it happens again.
Like a one goal loss to archrival and neightbouring nation, the Sweden?
It falls on the coach to get his team ready. "We couldn't get to our game" is getting very old. One should ask, why weren't they?
A headcoach can't escape responsibility every time his team loses in a big game, and always come up with this very same excuse.
What did he do trying to avoid this situation? Why weren't they able to get into the game? I mean, HE KNOWS, YOU KNOW, I KNOW that they weren't able to get into the game. But he's the head coach and he's supposed to do something about it. He's just portraying the problem every time, over and over again. Until the next time it happens again.
Last edited by bse on Sat Feb 22, 2014 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20507
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:41 pm
- Location: It's over man, we traded Despres.
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
LGP group think
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10182
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 8:12 am
- Location: Putin's mom's house.
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
What do you want him to say? American players just aren't as good as Canadians?bse wrote:largegarlic: "...it's a tough emotional turnaround from playing and losing a close game against your biggest rival to playing a consolation game less than 24 hours later against a team that's hard to hate."
Like a one goal loss to archrival and neightbouring nation, the Sweden?
It falls on the coach to get his team ready. "We couldn't get to our game" is getting very old. One should ask, why weren't they?
A headcoach can't escape responsibility every time his team loses in a big game, and always come up with this very same excuse.
What did he do trying to avoid this situation? Why weren't they able to get into the game? I mean, HE KNOWS, YOU KNOW, I KNOW that they weren't able to get into the game. But he's the head coach and he's supposed to do something about it. He's just portraying the problem every time, over and over again. Until the next time it happens again.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 9:43 am
- Location: Finland
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
But Tico, they surely are as good as or better than the Finns. Why is it that every time games matter, DBs teams explode?Tico Rick wrote:What do you want him to say? American players just aren't as good as Canadians?
Like today, a 5-0 humiliation and every time Bylsma correctly phrases the outcome as "We weren't able to get into the game" (today in Sochi) or "We didn't get to our game" (in Pittsburgh)
I just wonder how many times we have to hear this over and over again before something is done to correct the various reasons behind these continuous failures in games that matter.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12633
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:07 pm
- Location: "Enough is enough!" - Mike Sullivan
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
I don't know about all the times DB has made similar comments after Pens flame outs. But today, specifically, I got the sense he said what he said to avoid throwing some of the players under the bus.Tico Rick wrote:What do you want him to say? American players just aren't as good as Canadians?bse wrote:largegarlic: "...it's a tough emotional turnaround from playing and losing a close game against your biggest rival to playing a consolation game less than 24 hours later against a team that's hard to hate."
Like a one goal loss to archrival and neightbouring nation, the Sweden?
It falls on the coach to get his team ready. "We couldn't get to our game" is getting very old. One should ask, why weren't they?
A headcoach can't escape responsibility every time his team loses in a big game, and always come up with this very same excuse.
What did he do trying to avoid this situation? Why weren't they able to get into the game? I mean, HE KNOWS, YOU KNOW, I KNOW that they weren't able to get into the game. But he's the head coach and he's supposed to do something about it. He's just portraying the problem every time, over and over again. Until the next time it happens again.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:13 pm
- Location: A flute with no holes, is not a flute. A donut with no hole, is a Danish
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
Or the Finnish care more? Seriously they where motivated to have Selanne go out with a medal, that seems to get lost in all the bylsma bashingTico Rick wrote:What do you want him to say? American players just aren't as good as Canadians?bse wrote:largegarlic: "...it's a tough emotional turnaround from playing and losing a close game against your biggest rival to playing a consolation game less than 24 hours later against a team that's hard to hate."
Like a one goal loss to archrival and neightbouring nation, the Sweden?
It falls on the coach to get his team ready. "We couldn't get to our game" is getting very old. One should ask, why weren't they?
A headcoach can't escape responsibility every time his team loses in a big game, and always come up with this very same excuse.
What did he do trying to avoid this situation? Why weren't they able to get into the game? I mean, HE KNOWS, YOU KNOW, I KNOW that they weren't able to get into the game. But he's the head coach and he's supposed to do something about it. He's just portraying the problem every time, over and over again. Until the next time it happens again.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:18 pm
- Location: Edmonton, AB
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
Ya the Finns cared and would have beaten Canada if they were playing for bronze.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
In response to an above post...the loss to Canada was not "hard fought"
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1468
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:31 am
- Location: www.reviewjunkies.com
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
Brian Burke had a huge influence in putting together the team, too.murphydump55 wrote:Why? Shero was Asst GM. Poile was the GM.bhaw wrote:Yeah, I was going to say I actually think DB has a better chance at coaching again than Shero does at GM'ing again for USA.
Everyone was selected before Poile got injured, so what does the GM have to do once they board the flights to Sochi?
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2223
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:51 pm
- Location: Ponakronkoski
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
Dejan had a pretty good column on Bylsma.
http://triblive.com/sports/dejankovacev ... z2u5t9l0Jo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
To me, results are what matters. And again, we saw a Bylsma-led team steamroll through the games that in the big picture don't really matter and come up way short in the ones that do.
http://triblive.com/sports/dejankovacev ... z2u5t9l0Jo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
To me, results are what matters. And again, we saw a Bylsma-led team steamroll through the games that in the big picture don't really matter and come up way short in the ones that do.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25678
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:55 pm
- Location: 93.7 The Fans Favorite Twitter Guy
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
Honestly....who cares? Bring on the real games. Pens vs Habs baby!
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10182
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 8:12 am
- Location: Putin's mom's house.
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
We steamrolled over weak teams, as we should have, but to paint it as the US steamrolling throughout the preliminary rounds only to choke when it counts - as some are doing - is inaccurate. The US could have very easily lost to the Russians. Conversely, they only lost to the Canadians by one goal. The shellacking at the hands of the Finns could be due to, as others have suggested, a letdown less than 24 hours after the biggest game of most US players' careers while facing a team inspired to win a medal for Teemu.pensfan1989 wrote:Dejan had a pretty good column on Bylsma.
http://triblive.com/sports/dejankovacev ... z2u5t9l0Jo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
To me, results are what matters. And again, we saw a Bylsma-led team steamroll through the games that in the big picture don't really matter and come up way short in the ones that do.
The top tier teams in this tournament are all very, very good, and I think it's unfair to lay the blame for the US not medalling at the feet of Bylsma. Not that he is blameless, but there are other factors, such as the underperformance of Patrick Kane and the loss of Paul Martin, that I'd rank much higher up there.
But as Free Candy says, who cares? Let's hope all of this just makes Geno, Orpik, Martin, Jokinin, and Maatta more motivated to win the Cup.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12037
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:33 pm
- Location: Forever in blue jeans
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
I'm sure if we won gold the attitude would have been "Who cares?"
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10615
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:57 am
- Location: Sparta, WI
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
My favorite part of this is that people claiming Blysma didn't have a part in this, like Tico's thoughtful post above, are basically saying it doesn't matter who the coach was at all. Which is fine but then it makes all the chest thumping about how the Pens staff is so well represented at Team USA seem pretentious and hollow.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10182
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 8:12 am
- Location: Putin's mom's house.
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
Acceptance is the fifth stage of loss and grief. Maybe some of us are not there yet.
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9124
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:25 pm
- Location: Gleefully Ignorant
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
DudeMan2766 wrote:I'm sure if we won gold the attitude would have been "Who cares?"
The Detractors wrote:Until he wins the cup again this means nothing.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10615
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:57 am
- Location: Sparta, WI
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
hah. Awesome.Tico Rick wrote:Acceptance is the fifth stage of loss and grief. Maybe some of us are not there yet.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1510
- Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:20 pm
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck- ... 57389.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12633
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:07 pm
- Location: "Enough is enough!" - Mike Sullivan
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
Board strategists, please help me understand something. I warn you, these are going to sounds like incredibly stupid questions, but while I'm here to be entertained (and you guys often succeed here!), I'm also here to learn a few things:
Why would any coach intentionally "declaw" or neuter their team with a passive strategy? And why, when you purposefully constructed an "abrasive," in-your-face roster? I'm not arguing against the suggestion that DB did that; in fact, I'm not even addressing him right here. I just don't know why there would ever be a reason to do it.
OR, let me pose the question from another angle: What is the intention of deploying a 1-2-2, and is the neutering a byproduct of it in general, or just when things go wrong?
Back to DB: Do the rest of you see Parise's comment about the 1-2-2 and one forechecker as an indictment? Also, if that were the strategy USA were insisting on using, how could it have been deployed with greater (OK, any) success?
I wonder if anyone tried to talk him out of it. We'll probably never know.
Thanks, guys. Sorry, if I'm all over the place or confusing.
Why would any coach intentionally "declaw" or neuter their team with a passive strategy? And why, when you purposefully constructed an "abrasive," in-your-face roster? I'm not arguing against the suggestion that DB did that; in fact, I'm not even addressing him right here. I just don't know why there would ever be a reason to do it.
OR, let me pose the question from another angle: What is the intention of deploying a 1-2-2, and is the neutering a byproduct of it in general, or just when things go wrong?
Back to DB: Do the rest of you see Parise's comment about the 1-2-2 and one forechecker as an indictment? Also, if that were the strategy USA were insisting on using, how could it have been deployed with greater (OK, any) success?
I wonder if anyone tried to talk him out of it. We'll probably never know.
Thanks, guys. Sorry, if I'm all over the place or confusing.
Last edited by Lt. Dish on Sat Feb 22, 2014 7:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
don't the pens usually run a 1-2-2? Its moer of like a 1-1-1-2 I guess with the two forwards almost cycling in and out of the forecheck to force the puck carrier to his backhand and then the second forward to take over the forecheck if/when the puck goes over to the other dman. By the time that switch has occurred, that first guy is back at the top of the zone. with the defenseman who previously had the puck. The third guy is then to take away a lane or apply pressure to the puck carrier.
Anyway...I think everyone runs their own version of a 1-2-2, but having that loosely described structure doesn't necessarily mean its passive. I've seen a lot of people complain that the US shouldn't have been trying to run with the Canadians...
As far as my thoughts go...I think if they really sent two hard forecheckers and got really aggressive, they would have been asking for a track meet that you don't want to get in when you're less talented than the other team. Canada has a lot of cool defensemen with great puck skills that aren't going to be rattled by that pressure and are going to find their man for odd man attacks. The reason a team can get away with this normally is that they aren't playing an all star team. Every team has rookies that will get rattled and guys like Scuderi who can't handle the puck well and have 1 option and 1 option only...have the puck on the forehand and play it off the glass. Neither the US nor Canada have guys like that, so I don't think more aggressive was a great idea. Like I said, I'd rather be a little more passive when you have the advantage on goal and arguably on defense.
The US wanted a 1-0 game, but they came out on the wrong side of it.
Anyway...I think everyone runs their own version of a 1-2-2, but having that loosely described structure doesn't necessarily mean its passive. I've seen a lot of people complain that the US shouldn't have been trying to run with the Canadians...
As far as my thoughts go...I think if they really sent two hard forecheckers and got really aggressive, they would have been asking for a track meet that you don't want to get in when you're less talented than the other team. Canada has a lot of cool defensemen with great puck skills that aren't going to be rattled by that pressure and are going to find their man for odd man attacks. The reason a team can get away with this normally is that they aren't playing an all star team. Every team has rookies that will get rattled and guys like Scuderi who can't handle the puck well and have 1 option and 1 option only...have the puck on the forehand and play it off the glass. Neither the US nor Canada have guys like that, so I don't think more aggressive was a great idea. Like I said, I'd rather be a little more passive when you have the advantage on goal and arguably on defense.
The US wanted a 1-0 game, but they came out on the wrong side of it.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12633
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:07 pm
- Location: "Enough is enough!" - Mike Sullivan
Re: The Official Olympic Hockey Thread
Thank you, Idoit. I appreciate your thoughts.Idoit40fans wrote:don't the pens usually run a 1-2-2? Its moer of like a 1-1-1-2 I guess with the two forwards almost cycling in and out of the forecheck to force the puck carrier to his backhand and then the second forward to take over the forecheck if/when the puck goes over to the other dman. By the time that switch has occurred, that first guy is back at the top of the zone. with the defenseman who previously had the puck. The third guy is then to take away a lane or apply pressure to the puck carrier.
Anyway...I think everyone runs their own version of a 1-2-2, but having that loosely described structure doesn't necessarily mean its passive. I've seen a lot of people complain that the US shouldn't have been trying to run with the Canadians...
As far as my thoughts go...I think if they really sent two hard forecheckers and got really aggressive, they would have been asking for a track meet that you don't want to get in when you're less talented than the other team. Canada has a lot of cool defensemen with great puck skills that aren't going to be rattled by that pressure and are going to find their man for odd man attacks. The reason a team can get away with this normally is that they aren't playing an all star team. Every team has rookies that will get rattled and guys like Scuderi who can't handle the puck well and have 1 option and 1 option only...have the puck on the forehand and play it off the glass. Neither the US nor Canada have guys like that, so I don't think more aggressive was a great idea. Like I said, I'd rather be a little more passive when you have the advantage on goal and arguably on defense.
The US wanted a 1-0 game, but they came out on the wrong side of it.