BATTLESTAR GALACTICA WARZ Game Thread

[Sam's Drunk Dog]

I'm thinking slappy or nan. Nan for just joining bandwagons and hardly adding anything. slappy was the first vote for EPP after the canaan train had picked up some steam on day one. He was the first person on the rel vote.

I'll stick with my vote from earlier and lynch nan.

[Crankshaft]

lynch thehockeyguru

I thought it last day phase, I'm going with it now.

[MWB]

Is there a new rule in effect where we have to make a vote right away?

[Kaizer]

1 - SDD - redwill
1 - nan - SDD
1 - THG - crankshaft

[CBear3]

Is there a new rule in effect where we have to make a vote right away?

Shut-up and vote already! lol
I guess it's a momentum thing. It's sure going to take me more time to figure out the next vote.

[MRandall25]

There is something to say for the people hurrying and starting votes without much discussion...

Not saying their red, but it *could* be an attempt to try and start a "no questions asked" bandwagon on someone.

[canaan]

lynch SDD

what's your sdd rationale?

[CBear3]

I'm thinking slappy or nan. Nan for just joining bandwagons and hardly adding anything. slappy was the first vote for EPP after the canaan train had picked up some steam on day one. He was the first person on the rel vote.

I'll stick with my vote from earlier and lynch nan.

Would that mean you think canaan red and slappy was trying to derail the vote? Or is that because you think a red would want to prolong day 1 so he tried to stymie canaan's momentum? Or something I haven't even thought of?

I suppose all that's possible. I'm not sure being the first vote on a green is a big strike. If slappy is red how would he have known rel was green? He would have just offed him at night anyway.

I ask because slappy, nan, and you were the men of few words that worried me.

[canaan]

Yellow thg

color plox

[Sam's Drunk Dog]

I'm thinking slappy or nan. Nan for just joining bandwagons and hardly adding anything. slappy was the first vote for EPP after the canaan train had picked up some steam on day one. He was the first person on the rel vote.

I'll stick with my vote from earlier and lynch nan.

Would that mean you think canaan red and slappy was trying to derail the vote? Or is that because you think a red would want to prolong day 1 so he tried to stymie canaan's momentum? Or something I haven't even thought of?

I suppose all that's possible. I'm not sure being the first vote on a green is a big strike. If slappy is red how would he have known rel was green? He would have just offed him at night anyway.

I ask because slappy, nan, and you were the men of few words that worried me.

Slappy's vote on the EPP vote has me more suspicious of him than the rel vote. I've been busier at work this week so wasn't able to chime in much until today or post much at all. Nan might just be busy as well but he's been very quiet.

[Kaizer]

1 - SDD - redwill
1 - nan - SDD
2 - THG - crankshaft, canaan

[thehockeyguru]

Yellow NAN. What we should have done yesterday.

[redwill]

unlynch SDD
lynch canaan

[Kaizer]

1 - canaan - redwill
2 - nan - SDD, thg
2 - THG - crankshaft, canaan

[MRandall25]

Why, redwill?

[redwill]

Why not, MRandall25?

[slappybrown]

I'm thinking slappy or nan. Nan for just joining bandwagons and hardly adding anything. slappy was the first vote for EPP after the canaan train had picked up some steam on day one. He was the first person on the rel vote.

I'll stick with my vote from earlier and lynch nan.

Would that mean you think canaan red and slappy was trying to derail the vote? Or is that because you think a red would want to prolong day 1 so he tried to stymie canaan's momentum? Or something I haven't even thought of?

I suppose all that's possible. I'm not sure being the first vote on a green is a big strike. If slappy is red how would he have known rel was green? He would have just offed him at night anyway.

I ask because slappy, nan, and you were the men of few words that worried me.

Wait - I'm the one of few words? Had you even posted at all in the first few phases?

In any event, I explained my reasoning for rel. I suppose what he is saying is a role claim since I know nothing about this show and am relying on everyone else there. I think the reasoning wa sound there regardless.

Re EPP - on day 1, I vote for whoever is the first bandwagon unless 1) the bandwagon is me or 2) the target role claims. Not really sure how my EPP vote is in any was suspicious.

[slappybrown]

Why not, MRandall25?

What made you switch here?

[redwill]

Why not, MRandall25?

What made you switch here?

To make you ask questions.

[slappybrown]

Why not, MRandall25?

What made you switch here?

To make you ask questions.

And I ask questions to make you answer them. Your turn.

[redwill]

And I ask questions to make you answer them. Your turn.

You lack any power to make me do anything.

[Sam's Drunk Dog]

Slappy, wasn't referring to you as one with few words. I believe your explanation.

[slappybrown]

And I ask questions to make you answer them. Your turn.

You lack any power to make me do anything.

Right, but if you're going to arbitrarily change your votes every page and then refuse to provide any insight into why you're doing so, you can see why this is a mix unhelpful and suspicious.

I know you like to play some kind of provacoteur role in these games, but you're all over the place again.

[slappybrown]

Slappy, wasn't referring to you as one with few words. I believe your explanation.

I think CBear said I was a "quiet" one, not you.

[CBear3]

Slappy, I went through and found people I thought had been of few words. Obviously myself would be included, but I'm not going to vote for myself.

When SDD had suspicions of you, I went through the thought process and it didn't really jive with me. I asked questions because I was wondering if I was missing an angle. SDD was gracious enough to answer. Just thinking through things out loud.