Godfather Warz Game Thread

[columbia]

I'm fine with my vote from yesterday:

whack willie kool

Day 1: very late entry on killing a red
Day 2: voted against Juice, the independent
Day 3: voted to kill a blue

BTW, for those suspicious of me, I'm the only person in the game to:

vote to kill pavel and not be in on killing a blue on days 2 and 3.

[Willie Kool]

Which is exactly why I'm going to

Whack columbia

I was pretty sure mac was the vig after he confronted me about Juice. Far from killing him, I was actually trying to deflect last night's hit to me with my rat comment. And the fact you haven't voted blue frankly makes you look red to me.

[Willie Kool]

And I really don't understand how my going after Juice, an FBI informant, can be considered damning. How is an FBI informant going to help the family in this game?

[columbia]

I'm pretty bad at warz, but that would required me to avoid being on wrong side of a vote 3 days in a row.
(Which would be an impressive cumulative move for a red.)
Wait, I just pointed that pattern out and if I were so good at being red, I sure as heck wouldn't have alerted everyone to that.

[Willie Kool]

Just how late was I on that day 1 vote? Exactly 1 minute after you?

[columbia]

After *I* pointed out the farce of the Tattaglia = independent idea that pavel was claiming.

[Willie Kool]

Exactly. Funny, I was just about to quote that because I think your reaction looks suspicious, like a fellow red shocked by the ridiculous claim.
.

I'm Philip Tattaglia. The jack of all trades. The silly name should be proof enough for some. Now I'm at school with the 6th graders most of the day so I can't be sneaking to the bathroom to keep checking on the game. I'll vote when I get home.

The Corleones are up against the Tattaglias.
Why would one of them be a JOAT?

[columbia]

I'm even more convinced, but let's hear from some others.

[canaan]

I'm trending towards voting for columbia, but I'm gonna hold off til the morn when I'm at work/sober

[Sam's Drunk Dog]

Day 4 Vote:
WK – 1 (columbia)
columbia – 1 (WK)

[columbia]

I'm trending towards voting for columbia, but I'm gonna hold off til the morn when I'm at work/sober

Are you sober now?

[canaan]

I'm trending towards voting for columbia, but I'm gonna hold off til the morn when I'm at work/sober

Are you sober now?

im at work, lets just end it there.

[thehockeyguru]

I'm trending towards voting for columbia, but I'm gonna hold off til the morn when I'm at work/sober

I'm leaning WK.

[slappybrown]

Columbia is meh to me

[Willie Kool]

Any other ideas then?

Columbia has been extremely active (over 50 posts) and IMO has been trying to steer the village. As shaf pointed out, he seems to have been positioning himself the whole game. His preemptive defensive post above with absolutely no heat on him seems really odd. The 5 person list he came up with earlier omitted people that I see no reason to clear - like nan and IE.

[thehockeyguru]

I wouldn't mind an IE vote.

[canaan]

Lynch slappybrown

Plz color

[Sam's Drunk Dog]

Lynch slappybrown

Plz color

[Sam's Drunk Dog]

Day 4 Vote:
WK – 1 (columbia)
columbia – 1 (WK)
Slappybrown - 1 (canaan)

Since there hasn't been much activity this weekend I am extending the deadline to Monday at 11AM.

[shafnutz05]

Any other ideas then?

Columbia has been extremely active (over 50 posts) and IMO has been trying to steer the village. As shaf pointed out, he seems to have been positioning himself the whole game. His preemptive defensive post above with absolutely no heat on him seems really odd. The 5 person list he came up with earlier omitted people that I see no reason to clear - like nan and IE.

NAN and IE were 4th and 5th on the Pavel vote, so they are kind of on the fence for me. If anything, I would be more suspicious of IE in that scenario, but I'm still doubtful.

On one hand, Columbia's defensive zeal makes me wonder what his game is, although in the few games I've played with him, he tends to be quite vocal and defensive. And in today's age of Warz games, not being on a blue vote is hardly vindicating.

On the other hand, WK's revenge vote on Juice in the first round (after the Pavel bandwagon had garnered four votes) could be a ploy to try and draw votes away from Pavel, but making sure he had an ostensible reason for his vote.

Gonna read some more and vote in a bit.

[shafnutz05]

Bueller?

[columbia]

I have a feeling that this will have to go beyond 11.

[shafnutz05]

lynch slappy

[slappybrown]

Why are you guys voting for me? Or is it just "hey why not"?

[Sam's Drunk Dog]

Day 4 Vote:
Slappybrown - 2 (canaan, shafnutz)
WK – 1 (columbia)
columbia – 1 (WK)