The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
(1) - Columbia - (Bhaw)
7 to Fire Upon
7 to Fire Upon
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17412
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:11 pm
- Location: :scared:
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
fire upon kraftster
Don't believe it was a coincidence that he was "protected".
Don't believe it was a coincidence that he was "protected".
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
So, would columbia be a part of that group who went after kraftster?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 24978
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
we said the same with redwill thothe wicked child wrote:fire upon kraftster
Don't believe it was a coincidence that he was "protected".
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I'm down for killing columbia. I'll put on the last vote too just in case I go down with him.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I would hope not, seeing has how you are deceased and all.newarenanow wrote:I'm down for killing columbia. I'll put on the last vote too just in case I go down with him.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Another ghost emerges....
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I think slappy is a better bet than kraftster at this point. I think kraftster is a blue and was saved by the union angel or saved by the reb angel so we waste today voting for him since he was pointed out as a potential target.
If slappy turns out not to be a red, then we can target someone else.
shoot upon slappybrown
If slappy turns out not to be a red, then we can target someone else.
shoot upon slappybrown
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
WTF, when did I die?thehockeyguru wrote:I would hope not, seeing has how you are deceased and all.newarenanow wrote:I'm down for killing columbia. I'll put on the last vote too just in case I go down with him.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
HA! I died like two days ago and missed it. Carry on.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I CAN POST TEW?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I can get behind either columbia or slappybrown. Both threw those later votes on mac as MWB pointed out. I'm not sure I understand these mason/vig roles being discussed. Since both apparent vigs (assuming there are two) just fired into the crowd I wonder if they're not more like ISKs in the sense that they just need to whittle down the numbers. If one is "good" aligned with union and one is "bad" aligned with confeds, I don't think they'd be shooting so blindly at risk of hitting one of their own. The fact that both are shooting tells me that no one in the game is "one of their own."
I guess one could consider them to be less threatening than reds but still could be very harmful if they are going to keep shooting -- they're bound to hit an RP at some point.
I guess one could consider them to be less threatening than reds but still could be very harmful if they are going to keep shooting -- they're bound to hit an RP at some point.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 44375
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Ignoranti
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Zombie Warz
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17412
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:11 pm
- Location: :scared:
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
redwill was different. He was drawing lots of attention to himself for bad reasons, so it was more likely someone would try to go after him that night. Kraftster on the other hand either has a role or it was a major coincidence. I hadn't seen anything that would lead me to believe he would be targeted last night.Letang Is The Truth wrote:we said the same with redwill thothe wicked child wrote:fire upon kraftster
Don't believe it was a coincidence that he was "protected".
I suppose it doesn't mean that he's bad, however.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17412
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:11 pm
- Location: :scared:
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
dodge special K
For now.
For now.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
(1) - Columbia - (Bhaw)
(1) - Slappy - (SDD)
7 to Fire Upon
(1) - Slappy - (SDD)
7 to Fire Upon
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
The night 3 write up where redwill was protected made it seem pretty certain there is a green vig.Kraftster wrote:I can get behind either columbia or slappybrown. Both threw those later votes on mac as MWB pointed out. I'm not sure I understand these mason/vig roles being discussed. Since both apparent vigs (assuming there are two) just fired into the crowd I wonder if they're not more like ISKs in the sense that they just need to whittle down the numbers. If one is "good" aligned with union and one is "bad" aligned with confeds, I don't think they'd be shooting so blindly at risk of hitting one of their own. The fact that both are shooting tells me that no one in the game is "one of their own."
I guess one could consider them to be less threatening than reds but still could be very harmful if they are going to keep shooting -- they're bound to hit an RP at some point.
The night 4 write up indicates someone else is shooting who is probably independent.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Um, I voted for EPP. The redwill switch to mac is pretty obvious. I thought redwill claimed a role, so I switched. Redwill then said he didnt role claim, I responded, and then wasnt on LGP. by the time I saw mac claim, it was too late. I had no idea that mac was the seer until the deadline has passed and i saw the writeup. Like most everyone else.
shoot sams drunk dog in the face
shoot sams drunk dog in the face
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Yeah and I guess we don't really know what to make of all columbia's nonsense, probably not worth it to try to read into it that he's one such independent shooter.bhaw wrote:The night 3 write up where redwill was protected made it seem pretty certain there is a green vig.Kraftster wrote:I can get behind either columbia or slappybrown. Both threw those later votes on mac as MWB pointed out. I'm not sure I understand these mason/vig roles being discussed. Since both apparent vigs (assuming there are two) just fired into the crowd I wonder if they're not more like ISKs in the sense that they just need to whittle down the numbers. If one is "good" aligned with union and one is "bad" aligned with confeds, I don't think they'd be shooting so blindly at risk of hitting one of their own. The fact that both are shooting tells me that no one in the game is "one of their own."
I guess one could consider them to be less threatening than reds but still could be very harmful if they are going to keep shooting -- they're bound to hit an RP at some point.
The night 4 write up indicates someone else is shooting who is probably independent.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I do recall you thinking there was a role claim now that I see you say that.slappybrown wrote:Um, I voted for EPP. The redwill switch to mac is pretty obvious. I thought redwill claimed a role, so I switched. Redwill then said he didnt role claim, I responded, and then wasnt on LGP. by the time I saw mac claim, it was too late. I had no idea that mac was the seer until the deadline has passed and i saw the writeup. Like most everyone else.
shoot sams drunk dog in the face
SDD was cleared by mac, however.
I'm going to go ahead and fire upon columbia, I don't see a better vote right now.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
Why are people voting for columbia
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
That's what I'd like to know.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
He has an apparently independent role which he alluded to being "dangerous" to both sides. His goal is to survive, and there have been random shots fired into the crowd by apparently independent people. He talked in Malk oracle-speak last night which does not seem to be part of his role since, at other times, he's talking completely normally.slappybrown wrote:Why are people voting for columbia
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
One of the goals is to have fun.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: The Battle of Gettysburg **Game Thread**
I didnt mean so literally -- in past games where someone has this kind of role, we have kept them around and controlled their actions. That is, if we believe he is actually independent.