I'm saying that if zaro wants to see what color Krafter bleeds, then he can kill him on his own. As for us I saw we put our best guess forward. And yes, if Kraft came back blue, I'd say that give some credibility to Rel. You have no reason to dis-trust him until there is a counter-claim, right?bhaw wrote:It doesn't tell us anything. If he comes up blue, does that make rel the seer or a red? Reds know who else is red and probability states daddy-K likely isn't purple.Benny Fitz wrote:then shoot him at night.
*Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
How, exactly? Relantel has said 2 things re: Kraftster... he is not red and he is not purple.columbia wrote:It seems like Kraftster can clear this up and we can then 100% trust Rel.
The implication is that he is blue.
We only know rel is lying if Kraftster is red or purple. If he IS blue, why would you trust rel? A red knows kraftster isn't red. And he likely isn't purple based on odds. As a red in the past, I have taken bigger risks claiming someone was something and gotten away with it.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
I think option (a) is best.
Of the active players, MWB seems reddest to me. I'd also be on board with an IE vote.
Of the active players, MWB seems reddest to me. I'd also be on board with an IE vote.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
A counter-claim this round is what the reds want (if rel is bad). That way they have all 3 parties and can knock off who they want.Benny Fitz wrote:I'm saying that if zaro wants to see what color Krafter bleeds, then he can kill him on his own. As for us I saw we put our best guess forward. And yes, if Kraft came back blue, I'd say that give some credibility to Rel. You have no reason to dis-trust him until there is a counter-claim, right?bhaw wrote:It doesn't tell us anything. If he comes up blue, does that make rel the seer or a red? Reds know who else is red and probability states daddy-K likely isn't purple.Benny Fitz wrote:then shoot him at night.
Look at rel's comments. He hasn't told us ANYTHING of substance that wasn't already known. The only thing he is claiming to know is Kraftster isn't red or purple but he did it in a weird way.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
Perhaps. I guess I'm just taking Rel at his word (that he's seemingly the seer).bhaw wrote:How, exactly? Relantel has said 2 things re: Kraftster... he is not red and he is not purple.columbia wrote:It seems like Kraftster can clear this up and we can then 100% trust Rel.
The implication is that he is blue.
We only know rel is lying if Kraftster is red or purple. If he IS blue, why would you trust rel? A red knows kraftster isn't red. And he likely isn't purple based on odds. As a red in the past, I have taken bigger risks claiming someone was something and gotten away with it.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
So your telling me Rel is claiming to be the Seer, but has only cleared Kraftster? There have been 4 night phases if thats the case who else has he investigated?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
Killing Kraftster won't clear rel. The best way to have know that rel is being truthful is that no other seer comes out. If someone else does, than we know we've got one red. If no one does, then we know rel is the seer.
I'm sticking with my IE vote since rel didn't say anything to clear her and since she was who I was most suspicious of to start the day.
I'm sticking with my IE vote since rel didn't say anything to clear her and since she was who I was most suspicious of to start the day.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
He sure seems to be claiming that.thehockeyguru wrote:So your telling me Rel is claiming to be the Seer, but has only cleared Kraftster? There have been 4 night phases if thats the case who else has he investigated?
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 4264
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:59 pm
- Location: Damn the Man! Save the Empire!
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
Your suspicions are so misquided.MWB wrote:I'm sticking with my IE vote since rel didn't say anything to clear her and since she was who I was most suspicious of to start the day.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 4264
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:59 pm
- Location: Damn the Man! Save the Empire!
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
Or you know, misguided... because I can spell.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
If rel is the seer and he is trying so hard to save a regular blue, that is a bad play by the seer.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
I think it was only in a "weird" way after he tried to do it casually at first. If people actually read casual comments and utilized them without calling attention to them (like I recall happening in the old days), it wouldn't have come to this.bhaw wrote:A counter-claim this round is what the reds want (if rel is bad). That way they have all 3 parties and can knock off who they want.Benny Fitz wrote:I'm saying that if zaro wants to see what color Krafter bleeds, then he can kill him on his own. As for us I saw we put our best guess forward. And yes, if Kraft came back blue, I'd say that give some credibility to Rel. You have no reason to dis-trust him until there is a counter-claim, right?bhaw wrote:It doesn't tell us anything. If he comes up blue, does that make rel the seer or a red? Reds know who else is red and probability states daddy-K likely isn't purple.Benny Fitz wrote:then shoot him at night.
Look at rel's comments. He hasn't told us ANYTHING of substance that wasn't already known. The only thing he is claiming to know is Kraftster isn't red or purple but he did it in a weird way.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
Exactly what I'm getting at. He had the opportunity to clear it up, despite the obvious implications he was making. Then when called out to make things clear, he only muddled them.thehockeyguru wrote:So your telling me Rel is claiming to be the Seer, but has only cleared Kraftster? There have been 4 night phases if thats the case who else has he investigated?
I actually think he AND Kraftster may be red.
First he said Kraftster wasn't red (based on nothing and not stating he was the seer). So a bunch of people presumed he was purple and that he may still be worth killing b/c he's not necessarily with the village. As soon as that came out, rel chimed in the kraftster wasn't purple either.
The timing of the comments are what's weird along with the "info" he has provided.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
It would be quite ironic if IrishEyes was the seer.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
This was my feeling as well. He tried subtlety and it didn't work, and he get frustrated, which was stupid.Kraftster wrote:
I think it was only in a "weird" way after he tried to do it casually at first. If people actually read casual comments and utilized them without calling attention to them (like I recall happening in the old days), it wouldn't have come to this.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
bhaw wrote:Exactly what I'm getting at. He had the opportunity to clear it up, despite the obvious implications he was making. Then when called out to make things clear, he only muddled them.thehockeyguru wrote:So your telling me Rel is claiming to be the Seer, but has only cleared Kraftster? There have been 4 night phases if thats the case who else has he investigated?
I actually think he AND Kraftster may be red.
First he said Kraftster wasn't red (based on nothing and not stating he was the seer). So a bunch of people presumed he was purple and that he may still be worth killing b/c he's not necessarily with the village. As soon as that came out, rel chimed in the kraftster wasn't purple either.
The timing of the comments are what's weird along with the "info" he has provided.
Completely agree. Until Rel comes out and says I saw these 4 people I'm under the impression that he was a Red that slipped up.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
MWB wrote:It would be quite ironic if IrishEyes was the seer.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
Blindly voting for a blue player isn't a good vote, when the goal is to find the British and the Unionists. Now, whether the blue claim is true or not - I tend to think it is but I'm not 100% on that.MWB wrote:So then why would you suggest that IE isn't a good vote if the only thing to go on is that she claims not to be blue?relantel wrote:Krafster is not purple. All I know of IE is she claims blue.
I've come out of this phase much more suspcious of troy, thg and MWB than going in, even though MWB seemed to be the only one who could read.
For the rest of you, this disaster of a day that features the outing of most of the greens continues. I attempted to avoid the direct outing but it seems some have left me no choice. I am the seer.
The following information may not be current, if a recruit has taken place. But c2i and benny were blue. Bhaw assumes Kraftster is blue, and he may well be. There was no fourth night as the night phase began too late/ended too early last night/this morning.
Then bhaw supposes I and Kraftster are red. Tends to make me think he is...
throw bhaw in the bog.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
I'm picking up what you're putting down bhaw.
Will no one else will help me push MWB into the bog of eternal stench?
Will no one else will help me push MWB into the bog of eternal stench?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
I agree, but once called out (even if it was by a red trying to out him), he didn't provide ANYTHING substantial. Again, here is what he told us:Kraftster wrote:I think it was only in a "weird" way after he tried to do it casually at first. If people actually read casual comments and utilized them without calling attention to them (like I recall happening in the old days), it wouldn't have come to this.
Zaro claimed green (we all knew that)
NAN is the angle (NAN claimed that)
you aren't red
IE claims blue (which we all saw)
And now with all the discussion he doesn't want to add to it.
I'm not saying to ax relantel, but if he IS the seer, he outed himself and didn't provide us with anything.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
Rel, this is the second time you've just believed someone when they say they are blue. I just don't get that. I'm not blindly voting for IE; I've explained my reason.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 4264
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:59 pm
- Location: Damn the Man! Save the Empire!
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
I will, benny.Benny Fitz wrote:I'm picking up what you're putting down bhaw.
Will no one else will help me push MWB into the bog of eternal stench?
Provided rel is correct, I apologize for the vote.
save benny
bog MWB
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 44375
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Ignoranti
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
Looks like I picked a bad time to do my shopping.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20235
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
So in a nutshell Rel outted himself as the Seer with no heat on him to clear Kraftster who is a blue?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *Irish Revolution Warz Game Thread*
well..we know that c2i and benny are blue.bhaw wrote:I agree, but once called out (even if it was by a red trying to out him), he didn't provide ANYTHING substantial. Again, here is what he told us:Kraftster wrote:I think it was only in a "weird" way after he tried to do it casually at first. If people actually read casual comments and utilized them without calling attention to them (like I recall happening in the old days), it wouldn't have come to this.
Zaro claimed green (we all knew that)
NAN is the angle (NAN claimed that)
you aren't red
IE claims blue (which we all saw)
And now with all the discussion he doesn't want to add to it.
I'm not saying to ax relantel, but if he IS the seer, he outed himself and didn't provide us with anything.