MWB wrote:If he's not posting elsewhere, Im not that suspicious of kraftster. Hes got a newborn.
Notmreally liking how fast people voted for ps87.
yeah, but i'm not going to just assume he's not bad cause he's probably busy.
MWB wrote:If he's not posting elsewhere, Im not that suspicious of kraftster. Hes got a newborn.
Notmreally liking how fast people voted for ps87.
Who is?Troy Loney wrote:MWB wrote:If he's not posting elsewhere, Im not that suspicious of kraftster. Hes got a newborn.
Notmreally liking how fast people voted for ps87.
yeah, but i'm not going to just assume he's not bad cause he's probably busy.
Wars is inherently speculative. Often that leads to confusion. In this case, the confusion helps the British, so those fomenting the confusion arise suspicion. (Great Hitchcock film, btw)Troy Loney wrote:You said your not THAT suspicious of him...that's pretty close to saying that, "I don't know he's not bad, but I'm not voting for him".
He's playing different this game, whether thats a tactical ploy or external circumstances, it's all speculative...right?
Lulz... you added the emphasis. Then insinuate that I'm very close to saying I'm not voting for him. Quite a stretch.Troy Loney wrote:You said your not THAT suspicious of him...that's pretty close to saying that, "I don't know he's not bad, but I'm not voting for him".
He's playing different this game, whether thats a tactical ploy or external circumstances, it's all speculative...right?
This is where I stand. I really have nothing to offer right now. This is just an unusual game so far.Gaucho wrote:ps87 has been quieter than usual. But not as quiet as others. In other words: I'm clueless.
Especially the first 3...it makes more sense to try and smoke one of them out than to go after ps87.MWB wrote:bhaw, kraftster, godric, and mac are all very limited in their posting. I think I got the ones with less than 5 posts.
This isn't true. Just checked, and Kraftster has been posting both today and yesterday in other areas.... so his absence seems a lot more odd to me.columbia wrote:Based on a quick scan, he doesn't seem to be on the board much in the last few days.
Don't really know anything about godric... is this his first game? Strange that kraftster hasn't posted since he's usually very active and he is posting elsewhere. Bhaw usually comes on to vote for me because I'm talking more/less than usual.columbia wrote:Especially the first 3...it makes more sense to try and smoke one of them out than to go after ps87.MWB wrote:bhaw, kraftster, godric, and mac are all very limited in their posting. I think I got the ones with less than 5 posts.
that's all we can/supposed to do is smoke people out. We put the heat on people with votes to see if they sweat. All the while our greens sit behind the scenes and gather clues, tells, decide who to investigate, etc. That's all I wanted out of the Ulf vote. I was a baddie with him and knew the way he overreaacted to being called out. So I thought with a couple votes we'd get to see his reaction. Too bad he didnt get back in time to protest. I'm not convinced ps87 is a baddie. But that's not why i vote for him. I want to see his reaction...columbia wrote:Especially the first 3...it makes more sense to try and smoke one of them out than to go after ps87.MWB wrote:bhaw, kraftster, godric, and mac are all very limited in their posting. I think I got the ones with less than 5 posts.
pittsports87 wrote:I'm just a blue, but whatever.
I voted for him because he had a couple votes last round and then the vote on ulf took off, even though there really wasn't much to go on with him.count2infinity wrote:i've been in placement testing all day, what's going on with ps87? just quiet?