Kraftster wrote:
columbia's attempted preemptive blue claim really strikes me as odd. Shaf stood out to me for some reason, I am going back through to see if I can remember what it was.
The preemptive claim was rational.
If Gaucho were blue - which he was - I was one of the few he refused to join the bandwagon and I cut into the whole slappy fiasco.
Note that I was correct.
If he were red, I knew that I would be the next target for the reasons above.
I wanted to get the conversation started to see who might go after me in the hope that the drunks could get some info from me getting whacked.
I think the kill of bhaw was smart and am not surprised that ps87 wasn't killed. Reds often leave a role claim guy out there to see if he'll get voted off due to doubt in the claim. Kraft's post makes me more suspicious of him.
the bhaw kill, his reaction to it, and the overly folksy interactions with other players (that's not Kraftster's usual game) makes me suspicious. Not to mention he didn't start getting suspicious of me until I mentioned his name.
I would prefer Krafster if I had a choice, his style is perplexing to me, and I felt that he agreed too much with everyone last day phase. Just seemed off to me.
BTW: I think it's really odd that Kraftster is focusing on my preemptive claim, as he called it.
Aside from PS87 everyone is tacitly claiming to be blue. I just did it explicitly.
MWB wrote:Hey, I didn't vote for gaucho, so I must be blue.
The entire exchange started with me pointing out the completely baseless run against Gaucho.
You'll note that I was correct....That's actually far more than you did, come to think of it.
Hmmmm.
Honestly this is the most "fishy" "hunch" "suspicious" chatter I've heard in a long time that, at least as a review, is not really based on anything very concrete at all. The bhaw kill? Really?
At least we've identified a baddie or two. I guarantee you that one or two of the votes on me right now is red.
Can one of the ones carrying the Kraftster pitchforks explain the reasoning for the vote on me or what I did that is so fishy? I'll try to address it so that we can move on and look at one of the folks that has a vote on me right now.