~~ WWE Wars Game Thread ~~

[shafnutz05]

Troy Loney - 4 (NAN, PFIDC, skullman80, steve784)
Malkamaniac - 4 (redwill, relantel, mac5155)
pittsports87 - 3 (Corvidae, Malkamaniac, crayz)
MWB - 2 (THG, doublem)
PFIDC - 1 (Troy Loney)
crayz - 1 (slappy)

12 to lynch

The vote count is correct.

[thehockeyguru]

Like I said earlier. If there are 4 on me, there's a double vote going on.

which appears to be the case.

[redwill]

Well, it isn't me, as far as I know. Let's see:

unpin Malkamaniac

[crayz]

Like I said earlier. If there are 4 on me, there's a double vote going on.

which appears to be the case.

Malkamaniac - 1 (redwill)


the other two voted side by side so can't tell who it is.

[newarenanow]

The double vote isn't redwill, so either between relantel or mac

unpin Troy
pin relantel

It's a 50/50 shot

[Malkamaniac]

Well it could be the case, but if it's a double vote, the baddies would put the double vote on a random person to cause heat. Look outside of the box and go for someone else.

[Troy Loney]

Double voter does not imply being bad NAN.

[redwill]

Like I said earlier. If there are 4 on me, there's a double vote going on.

which appears to be the case.

Malkamaniac - 1 (redwill)

the other two voted side by side so can't tell who it is.

Yeah, I realized that just after I posted. I'll stick with it for now and see what happens.

pin Malkamaniac

[MWB]

Double voter does not imply being bad NAN.

True. In fact, it would be a pretty easy tell.

[pittsports87]

I don't think the double vote means much other than the bad guys trying to frame either relantel or mac. I've been in like 2 games that the baddies tried to do this.

If anything, I am a little suspicious of NAN right now jumping on it so fast.

[crayz]

I think it is relantel

What's up with the edited counts, I saw 12, assumed that was a correction of the prior count, so saw two more votes, and assumed that was 14 and over the limit, and thus didn't pin LITT...

just happened to miss the first vote ...woulda been obvious.

mac didn't vote in the first day either.

When TL & i were bad...TL was a double voter i believe. Don't recall seeing a "good" double voter before...

[Troy Loney]

I think it is relantel

What's up with the edited counts, I saw 12, assumed that was a correction of the prior count, so saw two more votes, and assumed that was 14 and over the limit, and thus didn't pin LITT...

just happened to miss the first vote ...woulda been obvious.

mac didn't vote in the first day either.

When TL & i were bad...TL was a double voter i believe. Don't recall seeing a "good" double voter before...

I think there is a power to give someone a double vote...or there is also some randomizer thing the mods could do give someone double voting...not sure...but actually if we spot a double voter i would lean to the person not being bad.

[shafnutz05]

Malkamaniac - 4 (redwill, relantel, mac5155)
pittsports87 - 3 (Corvidae, Malkamaniac, crayz)
Troy Loney - 3 (PFIDC, skullman80, steve784)
MWB - 2 (THG, doublem)
PFIDC - 1 (Troy Loney)
crayz - 1 (slappy)
relantel - 1 (NAN)

12 to lynch

The vote count is correct.

[Malkamaniac]

There was definitely a power to double vote the last time I was bad. Not saying it could be in this one, but that seems like a likely option.

[newarenanow]

Double voter does not imply being bad NAN.

But it could.

[pittsports87]

I just went back and looked. 1984 warz the bad guys had the power to put a double vote on anyone they wanted for a day. They picked someone that was blue. Doesn't mean it is the case this game, but I wouldn't doubt it if it was.

[MWB]

Has there been a game where there was a bad guy who's power was to have his vote count twice (as opposed to mandating someone else's vote count twice)?

[Malkamaniac]

Has there been a game where there was a bad guy who's power was to have his vote count twice (as opposed to mandating someone else's vote count twice)?

I don't think so, but I do now that's not out of the realm of possibilities.

[Troy Loney]

can mac and relantel hurry up and pull their votes of malk so we can see who the double voter is?

[mac5155]

ok im ending all this confusion. i'm a double voter. its my role. i have no affiliation to either side but that "could change".. well i guess i have an affiliation to the blue regular people.. if that is considered a "side"

i'll unvote to prove it if you'd wish.

[mac5155]

im not being controlled.. my vote just counts as 2

[Malkamaniac]

ok im ending all this confusion. i'm a double voter. its my role. i have no affiliation to either side but that "could change".. well i guess i have an affiliation to the blue regular people.. if that is considered a "side"

i'll unvote to prove it if you'd wish.

I really don't like this description at all.

[MWB]

Interesting..... That seems dangerous to me.

[mac5155]

why?

[mac5155]

Interesting..... That seems dangerous to me.

which is why i threw it out there. i wanted to abstain from voting but figured that would be more suspicious.