***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Yep, I have nothing to go on either. Until we get a bad player, its hard to really get much going.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
My last post was in response to NAN.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
No argument from me.slappybrown wrote:Yep, I have nothing to go on either. Until we get a bad player, its hard to really get much going.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 13430
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Ok, Troy but I kind of don't believe you.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14111
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:47 am
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
I somehow missed KNAN claiming to be a hot pair of JORTS.PensFanInDC wrote:kill nan
I can't discern anything from the thread so far and I trust Canaan to be the joat as he claims. I'll run with his vote.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Yeah, I believe canaan, too. His attempt at getting Kicksave was useless, as several of us pointed out that canaan being blocked did nothing to implicate Kicksave. But I see absolutely no reason for canaan to come out with that info if he was red. What would be the point to come out as an RP simply to get a blue? So I definitely believe him.PensFanInDC wrote:I trust Canaan to be the joat as he claims. I'll run with his vote.
Dunno about nan, though.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
doublem wrote:Ok, Troy but I kind of don't believe you.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Page 4Corvidae wrote:I somehow missed KNAN claiming to be a hot pair of JORTS.PensFanInDC wrote:kill nan
I can't discern anything from the thread so far and I trust Canaan to be the joat as he claims. I'll run with his vote.
canaan wrote:i tried to investigate kicksave and i was blocked. im the joat.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 24978
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
did canaan say something about investing nan? or since he was blocked on ks does that mean he used it anyways?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
The bad guys are getting exactly what they want here, a nice spreadout vote with little input on most of the votes.
It's ok to vote out a blue right now if the blue carries questions with them. It eliminates those questions in the future and it can also establish some other patterns.
When people are going all over the place and voting "just becasue", it plays right into the baddies hands, and the very next day, you are still going to have questions on the people you were thinking of voting out.
It's ok to vote out a blue right now if the blue carries questions with them. It eliminates those questions in the future and it can also establish some other patterns.
When people are going all over the place and voting "just becasue", it plays right into the baddies hands, and the very next day, you are still going to have questions on the people you were thinking of voting out.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Trying to get some extra info there baddie?Letang Is The Truth wrote:did canaan say something about investing nan? or since he was blocked on ks does that mean he used it anyways?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 24978
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
im trying to see if i should switch my vote to nan with our good RP if he has additional infoPensFanInDC wrote:Trying to get some extra info there baddie?Letang Is The Truth wrote:did canaan say something about investing nan? or since he was blocked on ks does that mean he used it anyways?
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
I believe he said he killed thg and tried to investigate Kicksave.Letang Is The Truth wrote:im trying to see if i should switch my vote to nan with our good RP if he has additional info
I don't think he has said he has any other info. I think some folks are following him simply because they believe he's a good RP. Which isn't the best reasoning, but is somewhat better than some of the other stuff flying around.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Exactly. At this early stage its the best bet IMO.redwill wrote:I believe he said he killed thg and tried to investigate Kicksave.Letang Is The Truth wrote:im trying to see if i should switch my vote to nan with our good RP if he has additional info
I don't think he has said he has any other info. I think some folks are following him simply because they believe he's a good RP. Which isn't the best reasoning, but is somewhat better than some of the other stuff flying around.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
I'd like to at least hear his reason for the vote. Because once you kill me, just because he voted for me, then you will be back to questioning relantel and c2i.PensFanInDC wrote: Exactly. At this early stage its the best bet IMO.
If he has a good reason, then by all means do it.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
shafnutz05 wrote:doublem wrote:Ok, Troy but I kind of don't believe you.
that's fine...i'm just saying relantel ususally makes bland, say nothing posts when he's bad. all he did this time was say, i'm not going to kill dagny right now cause she might be green...then she turned out to be green cause someone else made the deciding vote...if that doest justify an "i told you so" what does?
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 13430
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
I'm also thinking about changing my vote to NAN. His last post come off as angry and kind of bossy, seemed to be a clear give away but I don't know.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14111
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:47 am
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Unless canaan investigated NAN and saw that NAN was bad, why would anyone follow him based on the reason he gave?
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Ha. Or at least I will ... all by myself.newarenanow wrote:Because once you kill me, just because he voted for me, then you will be back to questioning ... c2i.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14111
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:47 am
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
And I mean this, of course.canaan wrote:tip nan
dont like 'em.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
This isn't a good enough reason? It's why shaf voted for doublem...Corvidae wrote:And I mean this, of course.canaan wrote:tip nan
dont like 'em.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 13430
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Why come out with that statement now though?Troy Loney wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:doublem wrote:Ok, Troy but I kind of don't believe you.
that's fine...i'm just saying relantel ususally makes bland, say nothing posts when he's bad. all he did this time was say, i'm not going to kill dagny right now cause she might be green...then she turned out to be green cause someone else made the deciding vote...if that doest justify an "i told you so" what does?
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
I think the reasoning is that -- if you believe he's a good RP -- he at least wouldn't be lying about his suspicions.Corvidae wrote:Unless canaan investigated NAN and saw that NAN was bad, why would anyone follow him based on the reason he gave?
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:28 pm
- Location: Summer in the Second City
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Can't we just bandwagon the noob like you always used to do to me?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
why the hell not...he was about to go and imo i think someone else should get killed. If i'm wrong wtf? i'm just a blue so i have nothing to lose.Why come out with that statement now though?