***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****

[Kicksave]

blue MWB
unperson DocEmrick

[Kicksave]

vaporize/whatever DocEmrick w/ the correct color

[slappybrown]

crayz - 2 (zaro, Dr. Emrick)
zaro - 1 (crayz)
Dr. Emrick - 2 (Mac, KS)

10 to unperson.

[pittsports87]

vaporize docemerick

[count2infinity]

crayz said it himself... he was third on that vote...

vaporize crayz.

[thehockeyguru]

vaporize zaro

[canaan]

yellow zaro while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty, smiting zaro is always a good route.

[mac5155]

this game is so hard to play in maxthon theme. but maxthon also looks like the user interface of a program i use at work. so I will have to sacrifice

[thehockeyguru]

while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty.

what are you getting at

[canaan]

while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty.

what are you getting at

you make poor decisions in warz games.

[newarenanow]

vaporize zaro

[Zarovich]

yellow zaro while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty, smiting zaro is always a good route.

If the "random wheel of death" is not available, I guess you have to do your own dirty work...

[canaan]

yellow zaro while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty, smiting zaro is always a good route.

If the "random wheel of death" is not available, I guess you have to do your own dirty work...

[the wicked child]

I think I'm going to vaporize crayz.

Seems like he played up the fact that he was the third voter to get us to say "well, if he's pointing that out, he can't be bad". It's been over a decade since I read the book, so I don't recall if that counts as doublethink or not... seems more solid reasoning than "he's a newb" or "it's zaro" at this juncture.

[Kicksave]

blue docemerick
vaporize crayz

[Azkar]

I think I'm going to vaporize crayz.

Seems like he played up the fact that he was the third voter to get us to say "well, if he's pointing that out, he can't be bad". It's been over a decade since I read the book, so I don't recall if that counts as doublethink or not... seems more solid reasoning than "he's a newb" or "it's zaro" at this juncture.

I like this... it's a theory that actually makes sense as opposed to random voting

unperson crayz

[newarenanow]

I think I'm going to vaporize crayz.

Seems like he played up the fact that he was the third voter to get us to say "well, if he's pointing that out, he can't be bad". It's been over a decade since I read the book, so I don't recall if that counts as doublethink or not... seems more solid reasoning than "he's a newb" or "it's zaro" at this juncture.

Sounds reasonable.

person Zaro
unperson crayz

[slappybrown]

crayz - 7 (zaro, Dr. Emrick, seetwoeye, TWC, KS, Azkar, NAN)
zaro - 3 (crayz, THG, canaan)
Dr. Emrick - 2 (Mac, pittsports)

10 to unperson.

[Malkamaniac]

I'm liking twc's theory.

Vaporize crayz

[pittsports87]

person docemerick[/color
]vaporize crayz

[slappybrown]

crayz - 9 (zaro, Dr. Emrick, seetwoeye, TWC, KS, Azkar, NAN, malka, pittsports)
zaro - 3 (crayz, THG, canaan)
Dr. Emrick - 1 (Mac)

10 to unperson.

[pittsports87]

Wow that got messed up bad. Lets try that again:
person docemerick
vaporize crayz

[PensFanInDC]

kill crayz to get things movin'

[slappybrown]

crayz - 10 (zaro, Dr. Emrick, seetwoeye, TWC, KS, Azkar, NAN, malka, pittsports, pfidc)
zaro - 3 (crayz, THG, canaan)
Dr. Emrick - 1 (Mac)

Limit reached, writeup coming.

[thehockeyguru]

while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty.

what are you getting at

you make poor decisions in warz games.

Surely you jest