i dont think she's bad. i wasn't fond of some of the reactions to the juice vote, but that's probably just pettiness on my part. things that i probably read as tells from the first vote are wrong. this was a strange vote with a lot of people throwing a lot of noise out there real early in the game. i do think that it is good to get a lot out from people though, when we do find a bad player with have lots of information from people.
Juice, a regular villager, was lynched by the village on Day 1.
slappybrown, a regular villager, was BOOMED! by the vig on Night 2
Kicksave, the village seer, was CHOMPED! by the wolves on Night 2
count2infinity, a regular villager, was lynched by the village on Day 2.
It is now Night 3.
Alpha: Whom do you want to kill? Angel: Whom do you want to protect? Vig: Never mind, you have no bullets tonight.
Deadline is 1 AM for RPs. I'll think about the weekend and post what we'll do in a little while.
The deadline for Night 3 (this night) is a hard deadline of 1 AM EST.
For Day 3, I will set the deadline for Monday morning (10 AM EST). However, the MAJORITY VOTE rule will still be in effect. In other words, if a majority (which will be 7, I suppose) is reached over the weekend, I will start a new night phase.
Juice, a regular villager, was lynched by the village on Day 1
slappybrown, a regular villager, was BOOMED! by the vig on Night 2
Kicksave, the village seer, was CHOMPED! by the wolves on Night 2
count2infinity, a regular villager, was lynched by the village on Day 2
canaan, a regular villager, was CHOMPED! by the wolves on Night 3
It is now Day 3. With 12 residents remaining, it takes 7 to lynch. Weekend rules are in effect (as stated before).
The way this dagny/shaf thing has played out I tend to think they're both regulars. dagny was suspicious of him early on and now looks at everything he posts as suspicious. There is such a thing as being too focused on one player in this game. shaf responds to everything trying to defend himself and it basically becomes a one on one battle. I don't think baddies would draw this much attention to themselves.
Hard to take a lot from the last vote since it was so spread out. I still think sdm, troy, and nan are possibilities. However, not sure that sdm would start another vote if he was bad.
Also, cup keeper doing his drop in of, "Is there really a deadline? Oh well, here's my vote, count it or don't" is a good way of keeping distance from what's happening.
Kicksave tried to subtlely start a vote for you on the first day. The fact that he wasn't super adamant about it, and emphasizing that it was for laughs, honestly makes me more suspicious. KS has been gunning for you since before this game even started, and it would not surprise me in the slightest if he investigated you the first night hoping to get lucky. Beyond that, I'm tired of having to defend myself every day.
Something isn't sitting right with me regarding him. Sometimes baddies jump into the thread with an agenda and post before they get caught up which causes some details to be wrong. This happened when he got shaf and slappy confused.
looking back, I'm liking an sdm or nan vote. I begin to think the baddies left Dags alive for lulz, and the continued confusion of her "spat" with shaf.
he's been following canaan's lead and going after me all game, i think with canaan dead and him throwing the vote out there with no reasoning looks like another simple frame job. then there's mwb who has been subtly implicating me all game. he goes and says that he thinks shaft and dags are both villagers. if they could steer a vote on to me this round, when everyone see's i'm blue he can resteer the village onto dagny because of my going after her last vote.
MWB wrote:The way this dagny/shaf thing has played out I tend to think they're both regulars. dagny was suspicious of him early on and now looks at everything he posts as suspicious. There is such a thing as being too focused on one player in this game. shaf responds to everything trying to defend himself and it basically becomes a one on one battle. I don't think baddies would draw this much attention to themselves.
Hard to take a lot from the last vote since it was so spread out. I still think sdm, troy, and nan are possibilities. However, not sure that sdm would start another vote if he was bad.
Also, cup keeper doing his drop in of, "Is there really a deadline? Oh well, here's my vote, count it or don't" is a good way of keeping distance from what's happening.
Huh?
There is no dagny/shaf "thing", there is no spat. I think he's bad.
I spent the whole round yesterday saying I want to know what he is. Making a case for why he looks bad, to me. I quoted posts, I said if he's not bad he's got bhaw syndrome, and I also pointed out that thg seemed to be trying hard to deflect the vote from shaf.
It's all there to be read. So, did you miss it all, or are you just trying to turn it into something it isn't?
Something isn't sitting right with me regarding him. Sometimes baddies jump into the thread with an agenda and post before they get caught up which causes some details to be wrong. This happened when he got shaf and slappy confused.
Keep this one in mind. I'd also considered this point, but filed it in the back of my mind, with shafty standing out so much to me.
MWB wrote:The way this dagny/shaf thing has played out I tend to think they're both regulars. dagny was suspicious of him early on and now looks at everything he posts as suspicious. There is such a thing as being too focused on one player in this game. shaf responds to everything trying to defend himself and it basically becomes a one on one battle. I don't think baddies would draw this much attention to themselves.
Hard to take a lot from the last vote since it was so spread out. I still think sdm, troy, and nan are possibilities. However, not sure that sdm would start another vote if he was bad.
Also, cup keeper doing his drop in of, "Is there really a deadline? Oh well, here's my vote, count it or don't" is a good way of keeping distance from what's happening.
Huh?
There is no dagny/shaf "thing", there is no spat. I think he's bad.
I spent the whole round yesterday saying I want to know what he is. Making a case for why he looks bad, to me. I quoted posts, I said if he's not bad he's got bhaw syndrome, and I also pointed out that thg seemed to be trying hard to deflect the vote from shaf.
It's all there to be read. So, did you miss it all, or are you just trying to turn it into something it isn't?
Yes, I missed it all
You spent all day yesterday focused on shaf and saying why you thought he was bad. He spent the day defending himself. That's the "thing" I'm talking about. Like I said, I don't think red players would draw this much attention to themselves. I thought that was clear in my post, but apparently not.
For some reason you seem to think that when someone doesn't agree with you, they are incapable of understanding what you're saying.
MWB wrote:The way this dagny/shaf thing has played out I tend to think they're both regulars. dagny was suspicious of him early on and now looks at everything he posts as suspicious. There is such a thing as being too focused on one player in this game. shaf responds to everything trying to defend himself and it basically becomes a one on one battle. I don't think baddies would draw this much attention to themselves.
Hard to take a lot from the last vote since it was so spread out. I still think sdm, troy, and nan are possibilities. However, not sure that sdm would start another vote if he was bad.
Also, cup keeper doing his drop in of, "Is there really a deadline? Oh well, here's my vote, count it or don't" is a good way of keeping distance from what's happening.
Huh?
There is no dagny/shaf "thing", there is no spat. I think he's bad.
I spent the whole round yesterday saying I want to know what he is. Making a case for why he looks bad, to me. I quoted posts, I said if he's not bad he's got bhaw syndrome, and I also pointed out that thg seemed to be trying hard to deflect the vote from shaf.
It's all there to be read. So, did you miss it all, or are you just trying to turn it into something it isn't?
Yes, I missed it all
You spent all day yesterday focused on shaf and saying why you thought he was bad. He spent the day defending himself. That's the "thing" I'm talking about. Like I said, I don't think red players would draw this much attention to themselves. I thought that was clear in my post, but apparently not.
For some reason you seem to think that when someone doesn't agree with you, they are incapable of understanding what you're saying.
So, you think I'm not red because I actively pursued him, and you think he's not red because he defended himself?
dagny wrote:
So, you think I'm not red because I actively pursued him, and you think he's not red because he defended himself?
mmmk.
For someone who questions people's reading skills all the time, you're doing an awful job of understanding what I wrote. But I'll try it one last time:
I don't think that bad guys would draw as much attention to themselves as the two of you have.
he's been following canaan's lead and going after me all game, i think with canaan dead and him throwing the vote out there with no reasoning looks like another simple frame job. then there's mwb who has been subtly implicating me all game. he goes and says that he thinks shaft and dags are both villagers. if they could steer a vote on to me this round, when everyone see's i'm blue he can resteer the village onto dagny because of my going after her last vote.
Right because going along with a vote for a blue makes me a baddie. Also, the fact that I voted for you one day, and canaan happened to vote for you too doesn't mean i'm following him.
