WWE/WCW wars GAME THREAD!

[thehockeyguru]

I understand your whole hockeynut doesn't contribute, but you just said you'd rather we vote people for how they play then how they don't.

Exactly. Which is why I wont vote for someone just because they are quiet. MY point is why single out HockeyNut! ? There are other players who are quiet as well, or havent offered anything to help the village.

[MWB]

I'm always down for a dagny vote because I think she's a vet, but I'm not doing it when someone can't defend her actions.

Why vote for a vet? Don't animals deserve health care as much as humans?

[count2infinity]

the reason i singled out hockeynut is because i cannot recall a single time in the games that he has played where he has said anything of substance... at all. MWB was also one i was going to point out, so i understand where you're going with that, but the whole Dagny thing is digging at me.

[count2infinity]

lol..just as i post an MWB doesn't post much post, he comes in out of nowhere. i fail...

[MWB]

I understand your whole hockeynut doesn't contribute, but you just said you'd rather we vote people for how they play then how they don't.

Exactly. Which is why I wont vote for someone just because they are quiet. MY point is why single out HockeyNut! ? There are other players who are quiet as well, or havent offered anything to help the village.

In the few games that Hockeynut has played, I don't think he's posted much (I'm not sure of this though). What benefit is that to the village? I'm always for voting the people who are always quiet off early.

[Malkamaniac]

THG, who was the person you voted for first?

The only post I saw was:" I have an exam yada yada"

[slappybrown]

Dagny hasn't been quiet! She talked last night! She has the disadvantage of being west coast. Why can't you see this? As far as I'm concerned You both have posted nothing of value, but Dagny has the ability to turn her thinking cap on.

Are you speaking to me? I didnt say she was or wasnt talking; I just said that if anyone is purposefully not voting on days 1 and 2, I would vote for them.

[newarenanow]

I'm going with pin thg.

I was willing to give him a chance, but he just creates way too much panic in the village. You don't need that now, and you definitely do not need that later.

That is exactly what happened a few games ago when I think it was shaft or slappy fighting with Malka at the end of the game over stupid stuff. It allowed Senka to slip through the cracks and win.

We don't need that.

[Malkamaniac]

Dagny hasn't been quiet! She talked last night! She has the disadvantage of being west coast. Why can't you see this? As far as I'm concerned You both have posted nothing of value, but Dagny has the ability to turn her thinking cap on.

Are you speaking to me? I didnt say she was or wasnt talking; I just said that if anyone is purposefully not voting on days 1 and 2, I would vote for them.

That was to THG

[thehockeyguru]

the reason i singled out hockeynut is because i cannot recall a single time in the games that he has played where he has said anything of substance... at all. MWB was also one i was going to point out, so i understand where you're going with that, but the whole Dagny thing is digging at me.

Point taken. I have not been on when she was on. I had an exam last night and I havent really seen anything she has posted. I have NO REASON to vote HockeyNut!, Dagny, or anyone else who is perceived as quiet at this time.

I am suspicous of MWB for the way that he plays. He got on the Shaf bandwagon right before Relentel, didnt vote on Relentel, and pops in every now and again so he is aware of whats going on. He in my mind is a dangerous player and worth looking into. That is where my vote is and where it will stay unless Senka and shed some light on his claim.

[MWB]

lol..just as i post an MWB doesn't post much post, he comes in out of nowhere. i fail...

I posted some in the first day, but was not around for the second day phase.

[thehockeyguru]

I'm going with pin thg.

I was willing to give him a chance, but he just creates way too much panic in the village. You don't need that now, and you definitely do not need that later.

That is exactly what happened a few games ago when I think it was shaft or slappy fighting with Malka at the end of the game over stupid stuff. It allowed Senka to slip through the cracks and win.

We don't need that.

The common demoninator seems to be Malka stirring up things. I was the 1st vote on Relentel so..... when I come up as a regular villager you can thank Malka for causing the confusion again.

[count2infinity]

i'm not sure anyone thinks you're a bad guy THG, just a bad villager.

[Malkamaniac]

no THG. I'm done stirring it up with you. I can't continue to talk to someone that plays your style.

I'm sticking with the don't have anything nice to say don't say it. Which is where I'm at.

[Kicksave]

where is tfrizz to tally the votes?

[newarenanow]

i'm not sure anyone thinks you're a bad guy THG, just a bad villager.

[thehockeyguru]

i'm not sure anyone thinks you're a bad guy THG, just a bad villager.

My whole point was a vote on HockeyNut! is a terrible idea. If that makes me a bad villager then so be it. I am done arguing my point.

[MikeEnIke]

i'm not sure anyone thinks you're a bad guy THG, just a bad villager.

My whole point was a vote on HockeyNut! is a terrible idea. If that makes me a bad villager then so be it. I am done arguing my point.

The vote moved to you pretty fast, you're defending him for no reason now.

[count2infinity]

it's called thinning the heard THG... when we get down to 1 mafia and 3 villagers, who do you want to be there with you? someone that posts, helps, and thinks clearly, or someone that doesn't post at all or cannot connect dots?

[MWB]

i'm not sure anyone thinks you're a bad guy THG, just a bad villager.

My whole point was a vote on HockeyNut! is a terrible idea. If that makes me a bad villager then so be it. I am done arguing my point.

It's "terrible" to vote for someone who doesn't participate much in the game? It seems that in every game there is a quiet person who is bad, just stays under the radar. It's usually cup keeper, but he's already dead.

[MikeEnIke]

i'm not sure anyone thinks you're a bad guy THG, just a bad villager.

My whole point was a vote on HockeyNut! is a terrible idea. If that makes me a bad villager then so be it. I am done arguing my point.

It's "terrible" to vote for someone who doesn't participate much in the game? It seems that in every game there is a quiet person who is bad, just stays under the radar. It's usually cup keeper, but he's already dead.

Not to mention, taking out the quiet ones is another example of thinning the herd. They aren't contributing anyway, so it doesn't really hurt us.

[thehockeyguru]

i'm not sure anyone thinks you're a bad guy THG, just a bad villager.

My whole point was a vote on HockeyNut! is a terrible idea. If that makes me a bad villager then so be it. I am done arguing my point.

It's "terrible" to vote for someone who doesn't participate much in the game? It seems that in every game there is a quiet person who is bad, just stays under the radar. It's usually cup keeper, but he's already dead.

Here is the mistake I made. I threw Dagny's name out there when it seems it wasn't relevent. HockeyNut! is one who has been quiet. Who else do you guys think fits in the same mold?

[count2infinity]

THG... save this quote for future games, "Oh, ok. I see what you're saying now. My bad."

[Troy Loney]

This is probably one of the worst arguments in LGP WW history.

From an objective standpoint...it just looks like a handful of people that want to jump on THG for anything he does and its causing this whole dilemma..

[jaysmiter]

Dagny has posted a good bit THG.

It's peoples MO to not vote on the first or second day sometimes.

In all seriousness though. Dagny has posted a good bit actually. Are you trying to push a vote on her when you know she isn't here to defend herself?

I'm always down for a dagny vote because I think she's a vet, but I'm not doing it when someone can't defend her actions.

If anyone really does have an MO of specifically not voting on days one and two, I will vote them out immediately. I dont know that this is the case with dags.

The whole pushing a vote when they arent here is way overblown.

I don't vote on day 1, vote me off, bro.

COME AT ME BRO, COME AT ME.