History Mafia -- GAME THREAD

[MWB]

Why not put it in before? That way it can be claimed that you were already voting for a baddie before he came out.... kind of like your defense has been already ("I voted for nan on day 1").

well considering the reasoning behind lynching me is that i "defended" nan, it wouldn't make much sense for me to defend myself with "I voted for azkar" that one time. Apparently I'm suspect because i'm not going with the herd and wanting to bandwagon people for the first 3 or 4 days.

That's not my reasoning for you. I think the timing of posts today was odd and that you referenced each of your non-nan posts with, "I'm still suspicious of him..."

[Twisted Wrister]

Senka is playing a low key game, just like NAN. Its not like him to do so. He's usually the one leading the votes. Always leading the bandwagon and so forth. It might be a good choice to go after him.

[slappybrown]

ok so here are the results i gathered (best that i could do doing a quick job...)

Day 2:

Voted for nan:
slappy
npv
litt
troy
kicksave
hockeynut
ie
pfidc
corvi
redwill

Did NOT vote for nan
CK
c2i
crayz
azkar
bhaw
zaro
relantel
mwb
tfrizz
tw
senka

Switches from nan:
troy
ie
pfidc
npv
corvi
red will
kicksave

Stayed on nan throughout day:
slappy
litt
kicksave
hockeynut

Day 2:

Voted early for nan:
crayz
tw
hockeynut
npv
slappy
kicksave

voted after bhaw brought up odd nan post:
c2i
bhaw
redwill
ck
twc
relantel
tfrizz
npv
corvi
npv
litt

Didn't vote for him in the end:
redwill
troy
mwb
ie
zaro
tw
crayz
azkar

The last category you have is fairly irrelevant. This is the relevant demarcation (can someone check to make sure MWB is accurate):

Here's the list of nan voters, in order, before nan came out: slappybrown, hockeynut, kicksave, c2i, cup keeper, bhaw relantel

The two people who immediately tried to start a bhaw wagon after the NAN kill are corvi and troy, both people who did not vote for NAN and/or switched off of them. I am pretty sure one or both is a baddie. Either one is fine with me.

[MWB]

mwb - didn't you indicate on day 2 that you agreed with me and vote for sdm as well? so the same points you are saying against me also apply to you, do they not?

Yeah, every game I say to vote for the quiet people... what's your point?

[Azkar]

I skipped like 7 pages. I see nan was bad, and he outed himself?

I was in class + following apple coverage.

[bhaw]

Why not put it in before? That way it can be claimed that you were already voting for a baddie before he came out.... kind of like your defense has been already ("I voted for nan on day 1").

well considering the reasoning behind lynching me is that i "defended" nan, it wouldn't make much sense for me to defend myself with "I voted for azkar" that one time. Apparently I'm suspect because i'm not going with the herd and wanting to bandwagon people for the first 3 or 4 days.

That's not my reasoning for you. I think the timing of posts today was odd and that you referenced each of your non-nan posts with, "I'm still suspicious of him..."

I never said i was suspicious of him b/c I wasn't until the one post I pointed out and then he came out shortly after. I said I'm not defending him b/c i wasn't defending nan. i was throwing out an alternative strategy other than bandwagon the first name thrown out there, which you agreed with.

[npv708]

mwb - didn't you indicate on day 2 that you agreed with me and vote for sdm as well? so the same points you are saying against me also apply to you, do they not?

Yeah, every game I say to vote for the quiet people... what's your point?

NAN was quiet...

[npv708]

Senka is playing a low key game, just like NAN. Its not like him to do so. He's usually the one leading the votes. Always leading the bandwagon and so forth. It might be a good choice to go after him.

Senka is #2 on my list right now. MWB is first. He never voted for NAN. Ever. He said he wanted to go after quiet people, but NAN himself was quiet and admitted he was red. Nothing from MWB.

[count2infinity]

unlynch npv

[crayz]

lynch mwb

[bhaw]

mwb - didn't you indicate on day 2 that you agreed with me and vote for sdm as well? so the same points you are saying against me also apply to you, do they not?

Yeah, every game I say to vote for the quiet people... what's your point?

it was a rhetorical question just to put it out there Everything you are saying about me could be put on you and a few others as well and you'd have the same argument for being suspicious of them.

right now, redwill, senka, and azkar are my top 3

Redwill for reasons stated earlier and what tl said - if nan was going to stop participating, it would make sense to get take the heat off of him and sacrifice himself.

senka isn't participating for whatever reason. even when he's been busy in the past, he's found time to come on and say stuff, relevant or not.

azkar is one of those quiet ones.

[Kicksave]

release bhaw

[npv708]

MWB, do you have any defense for never voting for NAN?

[Twisted Wrister]

Lets do it then.

Lynch MWB

[Azkar]

[bhaw]

Fwiw... even though i am going back and forth with mwb, i don't think he's bad. he's smart enough to know to not be so obvious about avoiding an obvious vote for a fellow bad guy.

[Troy Loney]

MWB, do you have any defense for never voting for NAN?

I'm sorry but this is kind of ridiculous....i got called out yesterday for voting for nan for no reason, and now people are calling others out for not having a reason to vote for nan?

[npv708]

MWB, do you have any defense for never voting for NAN?

I'm sorry but this is kind of ridiculous....i got called out yesterday for voting for nan for no reason, and now people are calling others out for not having a reason to vote for nan?

who called you out for it?

[Troy Loney]

MWB, do you have any defense for never voting for NAN?

I'm sorry but this is kind of ridiculous....i got called out yesterday for voting for nan for no reason, and now people are calling others out for not having a reason to vote for nan?

who called you out for it?

TWC & Tfrizz i think.

[bhaw]

MWB, do you have any defense for never voting for NAN?

I'm sorry but this is kind of ridiculous....i got called out yesterday for voting for nan for no reason, and now people are calling others out for not having a reason to vote for nan?

when people are suspicious of you, it's lose-lose. it sucks. i have some people saying it's wrong i defended nan, some people saying it's wrong i voted for him, some people saying the timing of my votes are bad. you can't win.

[npv708]

I'm sorry but this is kind of ridiculous....i got called out yesterday for voting for nan for no reason, and now people are calling others out for not having a reason to vote for nan?

who called you out for it?

TWC & Tfrizz i think.

TWC I have nothing on, but you mean tfrizz, who has spent the last few votes with MWB on me? hmm...

[Corvidae]

Fwiw... even though i am going back and forth with mwb, i don't think he's bad. he's smart enough to know to not be so obvious about avoiding an obvious vote for a fellow bad guy.

Hopefully this doesn't make you vote for me again, but I have to agree. I was pushing for MWB a few days ago, but if anything this makes me less likely to vote for him. You'd think he would have tossed a vote in there somewhere.

[the wicked child]

I am with crayz on this. those are 4 of my biggests suspects now.

Trot and tw cleared in my mind when nan was red.

As I pointed out this morning I was suspicious of mwb so I have no problem w that vote.

Lynch mwb

Color please. Phone sux.

[crayz]

I am with crayz on this. those are 4 of my biggests suspects now.

Trot and tw cleared in my mind when nan was red.

As I pointed out this morning I was suspicious of mwb so I have no problem w that vote.

Lynch mwb

Color please. Phone sux.

[bhaw]

Fwiw... even though i am going back and forth with mwb, i don't think he's bad. he's smart enough to know to not be so obvious about avoiding an obvious vote for a fellow bad guy.

Hopefully this doesn't make you vote for me again, but I have to agree. I was pushing for MWB a few days ago, but if anything this makes me less likely to vote for him. You'd think he would have tossed a vote in there somewhere.

net corvi <--- not a real vote, hence no color