Are you saying you knew he was bad?Kicksave wrote:I'm glad you guys got swayed the other day off nan.
So the mafia has no seer anymore, right?
Are you saying you knew he was bad?Kicksave wrote:I'm glad you guys got swayed the other day off nan.
NO!!!Kicksave wrote:
mac5155 wrote:quick writeup coming cuz i have a doc's appt
I'm not the good cop, if that's what you're asking. Nan was just acting weird and usually when we're closing to stringing someone up and then just switch, chances are that person always ends up bad.bhaw wrote:Are you saying you knew he was bad?Kicksave wrote:I'm glad you guys got swayed the other day off nan.
So the mafia has no seer anymore, right?
I was one of them. But how does that make me or anyone else that jumped on bad? He said he couldnt play anymore and outed himself as mafia. Of course people are going to switch to him.Kicksave wrote:Ok, after nan came out as red, who jumped on that bandwagon? Chances are he came out as red so when people jumped on, it would look less suspicious. I bet there is a baddie hiding in that list.
I have a couple of ideas about this, thinking that NAN probably said something to them like "hey I'm going to out myself, hop on and vote for me and it will help you guys throw the scent."Kicksave wrote:Ok, after nan came out as red, who jumped on that bandwagon? Chances are he came out as red so when people jumped on, it would look less suspicious. I bet there is a baddie hiding in that list.
Do you mean before or after he outed himself?cup keeper wrote:What if nan told his mafia buddies that he wasn't going to be able to play and then they led the charge against him?
I mean before he outed himself.PensFanInDC wrote:Do you mean before or after he outed himself?cup keeper wrote:What if nan told his mafia buddies that he wasn't going to be able to play and then they led the charge against him?
I also don't like how bhaw did this at night (even though his next post said not to answer it). Seemed like he was fishing.Kicksave wrote:I'm not the good cop, if that's what you're asking. Nan was just acting weird and usually when we're closing to stringing someone up and then just switch, chances are that person always ends up bad.bhaw wrote:Are you saying you knew he was bad?Kicksave wrote:I'm glad you guys got swayed the other day off nan.
So the mafia has no seer anymore, right?
Yeah, that makes sense. If he did it after outing himself it would not.cup keeper wrote:I mean before he outed himself.PensFanInDC wrote:Do you mean before or after he outed himself?cup keeper wrote:What if nan told his mafia buddies that he wasn't going to be able to play and then they led the charge against him?
So it would more likely be people who voted for nan before he came out, right?npv708 wrote:I have a couple of ideas about this, thinking that NAN probably said something to them like "hey I'm going to out myself, hop on and vote for me and it will help you guys throw the scent."Kicksave wrote:Ok, after nan came out as red, who jumped on that bandwagon? Chances are he came out as red so when people jumped on, it would look less suspicious. I bet there is a baddie hiding in that list.
.
I agree that this is a good way to go. I voted for NAN a few times over the last few days, but switched on/off. It won't do much to help my case, but it might help a little bit.crayz wrote:here's my thoughts....i dont have time to research atm while at work but if someone can...
1) List out who voted for nan on day 1 and who would not vote for nan
2) List who swapped off nan vs who stayed on nan
3) Who voted for nan yesterday/wouldn't vote
analyze these and i think we can make a suspect list