History Mafia -- GAME THREAD

[jaysmiter]

*rather keep someone around

[PensFanInDC]

I almost think we should stick wtih nan now because if he ends up bad, we can look at who staunchly defended him.

shall I translate this into "if NAN = baddie than bhaw = baddie"?

[slappybrown]

modus ponens? modus tollens?

[count2infinity]

well at the same time... sdm is a baddie, people defending him should be held to scrutiny as well.

[crayz]

I almost think we should stick wtih nan now because if he ends up bad, we can look at who staunchly defended him.

although I don't want nan dead today....i almost agree with this.

Baddies would have jumped on the nan train....and I would clear myself

now...if somehow he is bad i know i'll have signed my own death warrant and epic

[bhaw]

I almost think we should stick wtih nan now because if he ends up bad, we can look at who staunchly defended him.

and again, I'm not defending nan... I'm throwing out another alternative way to come up with a "random" name in day 2 that at least serves a minimal benefit to the village. I've already put it out there that I'd be fine voting for nan to move the game along, but since we weren't at 13 out of 14 votes, there's a chance to go for another theory THAT HAS BEEN AGREED UPON IN THE PAST BY MANY MANY PLAYERS AS BEING A GOOD STRATEGY FOR THE FIRST FEW DAY VOTES BUT HAS NEVER BEEN USED.

I didn't invent this theory. It's been thrown out there multiple times. I'm just trying to put it to use.

[Corvidae]

well at the same time... sdm is a baddie, people defending him should be held to scrutiny as well.

I think scrutiny should be held to maagwa on the eve of All NAN's Day.

[Kicksave]

I almost think we should stick wtih nan now because if he ends up bad, we can look at who staunchly defended him.

shall I translate this into "if NAN = baddie than bhaw = baddie"?

Maybe not so much bhaw but voting patterns don't lie. People who got on the nan bandwagon because they thought it was going to happen but jumped off to try and save one of hteir own when voting started rolling the other way.

voting patterns don't lie.

[Kicksave]

I almost think we should stick wtih nan now because if he ends up bad, we can look at who staunchly defended him.

and again, I'm not defending nan... I'm throwing out another alternative way to come up with a "random" name in day 2 that at least serves a minimal benefit to the village. I've already put it out there that I'd be fine voting for nan to move the game along, but since we weren't at 13 out of 14 votes, there's a chance to go for another theory THAT HAS BEEN AGREED UPON IN THE PAST BY MANY MANY PLAYERS AS BEING A GOOD STRATEGY FOR THE FIRST FEW DAY VOTES BUT HAS NEVER BEEN USED.

I didn't invent this theory. It's been thrown out there multiple times. I'm just trying to put it to use.

I didn't mean just you. Voting patterns.

[npv708]

Maybe both NAN and sdm are bad...

[jaysmiter]

I almost think we should stick wtih nan now because if he ends up bad, we can look at who staunchly defended him.

shall I translate this into "if NAN = baddie than bhaw = baddie"?

Maybe not so much bhaw but voting patterns don't lie. People who got on the nan bandwagon because they thought it was going to happen but jumped off to try and save one of hteir own when voting started rolling the other way.

voting patterns don't lie.

Sadly, I agree with you Kicksave.

[bhaw]

I almost think we should stick wtih nan now because if he ends up bad, we can look at who staunchly defended him.

and again, I'm not defending nan... I'm throwing out another alternative way to come up with a "random" name in day 2 that at least serves a minimal benefit to the village. I've already put it out there that I'd be fine voting for nan to move the game along, but since we weren't at 13 out of 14 votes, there's a chance to go for another theory THAT HAS BEEN AGREED UPON IN THE PAST BY MANY MANY PLAYERS AS BEING A GOOD STRATEGY FOR THE FIRST FEW DAY VOTES BUT HAS NEVER BEEN USED.

I didn't invent this theory. It's been thrown out there multiple times. I'm just trying to put it to use.

I didn't mean just you. Voting patterns.

Yeah, saw your 2nd post after I posted. Fair enough.

[Kicksave]

Maybe both NAN and sdm are bad...

mind=blown

[Letang Is The Truth]

i feel like the quiet player debate always causes a rise from everyone. there are two schools of thought apparently

[Kicksave]

and again, I'm not defending nan... I'm throwing out another alternative way to come up with a "random" name in day 2 that at least serves a minimal benefit to the village. I've already put it out there that I'd be fine voting for nan to move the game along, but since we weren't at 13 out of 14 votes, there's a chance to go for another theory THAT HAS BEEN AGREED UPON IN THE PAST BY MANY MANY PLAYERS AS BEING A GOOD STRATEGY FOR THE FIRST FEW DAY VOTES BUT HAS NEVER BEEN USED.

I didn't invent this theory. It's been thrown out there multiple times. I'm just trying to put it to use.

I didn't mean just you. Voting patterns.

Yeah, saw your 2nd post after I posted. Fair enough.

Actually, i'd look more at the people who swapped after you moreso than you. At first, at least.

[npv708]

i feel like the quiet player debate always causes a rise from everyone. there are two schools of thought apparently

the right one = mine
the wrong one = everybody else

right?

[Corvidae]

I almost think we should stick wtih nan now because if he ends up bad, we can look at who staunchly defended him.

shall I translate this into "if NAN = baddie than bhaw = baddie"?

Maybe not so much bhaw but voting patterns don't lie. People who got on the nan bandwagon because they thought it was going to happen but jumped off to try and save one of hteir own when voting started rolling the other way.

voting patterns don't lie.

[jaysmiter]

Well, as much as I'd like to continue this debate right now...it's lunch time. See you cats in a bit.

[bhaw]

Actually, i'd look more at the people who swapped after you moreso than you. At first, at least.

And I'll look at you looking at them but more so them than you and definitely more so them than me.

Yeah, I went there

[npv708]

shall I translate this into "if NAN = baddie than bhaw = baddie"?

Maybe not so much bhaw but voting patterns don't lie. People who got on the nan bandwagon because they thought it was going to happen but jumped off to try and save one of hteir own when voting started rolling the other way.

voting patterns don't lie.

?

[newarenanow]

i feel like the quiet player debate always causes a rise from everyone. there are two schools of thought apparently

I've always thought it was better to go after the quiet ones earlier because of the same thing bhaw is saying.

You keep the talkers around, people who participate, because it will help you later in the game. You can see patterns. You can go back and view posts.

When it is the beginning of the game, and there isn't much to go on, take out the ones that don't participate because later in the game, you'll have nothing to go on.

Just has always been my thought.

[Letang Is The Truth]

what if everyone PMed their top 3 suspects and then I could compile them

[npv708]

what if everyone PMed their top 3 suspects and then I could compile them

done.

[Kicksave]

what if everyone PMed their top 3 suspects and then I could compile them

Post an even number if you think bhaw is bad in the subject of a thread in the Penguins Jigsaw forum.

[PensFanInDC]

what if everyone PMed their top 3 suspects and then I could compile them

and then post something in npr that has the number 235325 in it