*** JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD ***

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:12 pm

thehockeyguru wrote:
slappybrown wrote:THG when did you tell KS about your role and why?
It was either day 2 or 3. When I was against Senka and I had 9 votes on me. KS was the only one who knew I was SB and helped to deflect the heat off of me. If I were to guess, he is not a Baddie, but I cant say for sure. They could have had 3 Good RP's very quickly.

Can you check your PMs and tell me exactly when you told KS you were Spongbob please?

Azkar · Post by **Azkar** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:12 pm

Kicksave wrote:I have to think that LiTT is bad.

canaan goes crazy = bad
beerman goes crazy = good
LiTT = bad?

Just a thought.

I think thats a bit of a reach.

I also agree that maybe KS has been feeding our vig bad info at times?

thehockeyguru · Post by **thehockeyguru** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:12 pm

WF, what is your thoughts on KS?

Post by **Kicksave** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:13 pm

They've shown that they'll put a role player with a regular villager. Not a good RP with a bad RP.

So when I'm proven to be good, then you'll be one of those "new leads".

Post by **the wicked child** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:14 pm

slappybrown wrote:Third, this Corvi is a mod -- NO LIMITS.

Don't underestimate the influence of the other 2 mods.

Spoiler:

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:16 pm

Kicksave wrote:They've shown that they'll put a role player with a regular villager. Not a good RP with a bad RP.

So when I'm proven to be good, then you'll be one of those "new leads".

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THREAT!

"Not a good RP with a bad RP."

So flimsy.

The only reason I am getting more suspicious of you are your posts in the past page.

Post by **Kicksave** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:16 pm

You're suspicious of me as soon as I voted for you

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:16 pm

the wicked child wrote:
slappybrown wrote:Third, this Corvi is a mod -- NO LIMITS.
Don't underestimate the influence of the other 2 mods.
Spoiler:
Although bhaw actually tamed things down a bit

Between the three of you, this island is descending into madness. I do have to request a Lord of the Flies reference in a writeup at some point.

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:18 pm

Kicksave wrote:You're suspicious of me as soon as I voted for you

I thought it was odd that on day 8 or whatever we are on, two people fire off votes on someone with no backing within minutes of a writeup. Either (1) just a poor play or (2) suspicious. Your responses since then are off for the reasons I posted -- and I havent even voted for you.

Corvidae · Post by **Corvidae** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:19 pm

slappybrown wrote:
the wicked child wrote:
slappybrown wrote:Third, this Corvi is a mod -- NO LIMITS.
Don't underestimate the influence of the other 2 mods.
Spoiler:
Although bhaw actually tamed things down a bit
Between the three of you, this island is descending into madness. I do have to request a Lord of the Flies reference in a writeup at some point.

I'm considering an epic, Slug Wars-esque style writeup for the next death. I shall consider your request.

Post by **Kicksave** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:19 pm

Because I like to see how people react when they get a vote on them. You went from a post every once in a while to full blown out defense mode.

Letang Is The Truth · Post by **Letang Is The Truth** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:20 pm

Aren't you guys (and gals) ready for some change? Fear of change breeds contempt. Challange the system! We can be better!

wallflower · Post by **wallflower** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:20 pm

thehockeyguru wrote:WF, what is your thoughts on KS?

I'm not sold either way on him. I didn't see any posts from him that jumped out at me but, at the same time, I wouldn't be shocked if he turned out red (just because I find him hard to read). He has a crap-load of posts in the game - he was at over two hundred when I counted last night - so it's entirely possible I missed something.

But it's also just as likely that we're being manipulated by the jellies into taking ourselves out.

Post by **Kicksave** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:21 pm

...200 posts in this thread? are you serious?

wallflower · Post by **wallflower** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:21 pm

Kicksave wrote:...200 posts in this thread? are you serious?

Both threads, combined.

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:21 pm

Kicksave wrote:Because I like to see how people react when they get a vote on them. You went from a post every once in a while to full blown out defense mode.

I think its the other way around. You didnt even have to respond to me saying lulz @ tryign to bandwagon someone at this stage.

thehockeyguru · Post by **thehockeyguru** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:29 pm

Azkar - Did you talk to Beerman? Did you get anything useful?

count2infinity · Post by **count2infinity** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:30 pm

Kicksave wrote:Because I like to see how people react when they get a vote on them. You went from a post every once in a while to full blown out defense mode.

ya know...if you vote people to see reactions and are surprised when they get defensive, you probably don't have a very good kill % because everyone is going to get defensive if they get called out like that.

Post by **Kicksave** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:31 pm

count2infinity wrote:
Kicksave wrote:Because I like to see how people react when they get a vote on them. You went from a post every once in a while to full blown out defense mode.
ya know...if you vote people to see reactions and are surprised when they get defensive, you probably don't have a very good kill % because everyone is going to get defensive if they get called out like that.

I'm not saying it's an exact science. I just like seeing people's reactions. Sometimes you can get some info from them.

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:41 pm

Has anyone done one of those voting history things so we can see who hasn't voted for the baddies? Tfrizz

?

Azkar · Post by **Azkar** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:50 pm

beerman told me he's the reason we went back in time. He also said he knew no jellies. He also said not to trust everything canaan told me

wallflower · Post by **wallflower** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:52 pm

slappybrown wrote:Has anyone done one of those voting history things so we can see who hasn't voted for the baddies? Tfrizz ?

I kind of did, when I was going through the thread yesterday. Though I'm not sure how helpful it is considering it's only a list of who everyone voted for [in order] but without the context of what day & who ended up being netted.

thehockeyguru · Post by **thehockeyguru** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:58 pm

Here is the voting history on me before I was outted:

09 thehockeyguru (Twisted Wrister, crayz, jaysmiter, canaan, Azkar, cup keeper, Hockeynut!, slappybrown, mac5155)

Here is what it looked like AFTER I was outted.

07 thehockeyguru (Azkar, Hockeynut!, IrishEyes, jwienand, crayz, tfrizz,Pavel Bure)
03 beerman (mac5155, canaan, thehockeyguru)
04 Pavel Bure (count2infinity,jaysmiter,kicksave,wallflower)
01 crayz (shafnutz05)

Only Baddie voted off was Pavel

Pavel 10 (jaysmiter,mac, thg, c2i, LITT, jwienand, tfrizz, kicksave, wallflower, Twisted Wrister)
thg 03 (crayz, Azkar, IE)
beerman 01 (canaan)
crayz 01 (shafnutz)

Post by **Kicksave** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:59 pm

Pavel 10 (jaysmiter,mac, thg, c2i, LITT, jwienand, tfrizz, kicksave, wallflower, Twisted Wrister)
thg 03 (crayz, Azkar, IE)
beerman 01 (canaan)
crayz 01 (shafnutz)

Post by **relantel** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Kicksave wrote:Pavel 10 (jaysmiter,mac, thg, c2i, LITT, jwienand, tfrizz, kicksave, wallflower, Twisted Wrister)
thg 03 (crayz, Azkar, IE)
beerman 01 (canaan)
crayz 01 (shafnutz)

Is this an indictment of Azkar in your eyse, Ks?

* JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD *

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)

Re: * JELLYFISH INVASION I GAME THREAD * (Part 2)