LGP Political Discussion Thread

Forum for posts that are not hockey-related.
doublem
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by doublem »

ExPatriatePen wrote:
doublem wrote:
I am also curious as to how the anti-corporatists in here will view this. IMO, unions are just as powerful if not more powerful than the corporations themselves. They are just as much a threat as the CEOs we are always made out to be so afraid of.
That is crazy. Maybe, if all unions were like major league baseball I would agree with you.
You'll defend this sorpupt administration to the very end won't you?

Do you think they're doing *anything* wrong? Where would you like to see them do things differently?
Do you have trouble reading? Pretty much everything, I'm pretty sure I have listed my complaints with the Obama administration many times and what does that have to do with labor unions as some mythical threat undermining America?
shafnutz05
NHL First Liner
NHL First Liner
Posts: 60559
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
Location: Amish Country

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by shafnutz05 »

shafnutz05 wrote:
slappybrown wrote:Because your "valid" point about unions includes, at minimum, one strawman, two broad generalizations, two instances of unnecessary hyperbole, and one unexplained legal accusation.
President Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi just crafted an amendment to their healthcare bill that excludes labor union healthcare plans from being taxed under the bill. However, everyone else that has a similar plan is going to get the hell taxed out of them. End of story. No strawman, no hyperbole.......and an unexplained legal accusation? Do you really think that favoring one group over another through tax policy is not unconstitutional? The fact that he is doing it because they represent a large Democratic voting bloc is even more inexcusable. I cannot fathom how you could defend this.
doublem, I want to know what you think of this. Tax policy used to garner favor with certain political groups and punish others.
Guinness
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 11465
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:30 am
Location: At the pub

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by Guinness »

doublem wrote: Question: Do you think that if we had your ideal version or system of Libertarian government that it would all work out in the end? Do you think that we only need to do X,Y and Z to have individual freedom and free markets? Do you see a positive outcome?
Uh, obviously. Do you think your view of things is destructive?
doublem
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by doublem »

Guinness wrote:
doublem wrote: Question: Do you think that if we had your ideal version or system of Libertarian government that it would all work out in the end? Do you think that we only need to do X,Y and Z to have individual freedom and free markets? Do you see a positive outcome?
Uh, obviously. Do you think your view of things is destructive?
It wasn't an insult. Calm down or a debate. It was a serious question becasue I don't see a positive outcome to anyone's views. I don't think if you do X,Y and Z things will work out. I just see to many flaws in any system for lasting success.
Last edited by doublem on Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
shafnutz05
NHL First Liner
NHL First Liner
Posts: 60559
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
Location: Amish Country

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by shafnutz05 »

doublem wrote:It wasn't an insult. Calm down or a debate. It was a serious question becasue I don't see a positive outcome to anyone's views.
My views always bring a positive outcome...the problem is I am not powerful enough to force them on everyone else :pop:
Guinness
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 11465
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:30 am
Location: At the pub

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by Guinness »

doublem wrote:
Guinness wrote:
doublem wrote: Question: Do you think that if we had your ideal version or system of Libertarian government that it would all work out in the end? Do you think that we only need to do X,Y and Z to have individual freedom and free markets? Do you see a positive outcome?
Uh, obviously. Do you think your view of things is destructive?
It wasn't an insult. Calm down or a debate. It was a serious question becasue I don't see a positive outcome to anyone's views.
I wasn't insulted, bub. I just thought it would be an obvious answer to the question.

I absolutely see the results of the system I espouse as positive. This does not me that I believe that it would be the traditional conception of Utopia, where all men live together in happiness, and where all needs are met and nobody wants for anything.
doublem
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by doublem »

shafnutz05 wrote:
shafnutz05 wrote:
slappybrown wrote:Because your "valid" point about unions includes, at minimum, one strawman, two broad generalizations, two instances of unnecessary hyperbole, and one unexplained legal accusation.
President Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi just crafted an amendment to their healthcare bill that excludes labor union healthcare plans from being taxed under the bill. However, everyone else that has a similar plan is going to get the hell taxed out of them. End of story. No strawman, no hyperbole.......and an unexplained legal accusation? Do you really think that favoring one group over another through tax policy is not unconstitutional? The fact that he is doing it because they represent a large Democratic voting bloc is even more inexcusable. I cannot fathom how you could defend this.
doublem, I want to know what you think of this. Tax policy used to garner favor with certain political groups and punish others.
Do you have a link?
Guinness
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 11465
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:30 am
Location: At the pub

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by Guinness »

shafnutz05 wrote:
doublem wrote:It wasn't an insult. Calm down or a debate. It was a serious question becasue I don't see a positive outcome to anyone's views.
My views always bring a positive outcome...the problem is I am not powerful enough to force them on everyone else :pop:
Convince people that you are god... er, I mean, run for President.
doublem
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by doublem »

I don't think anyone thinks of Utopia anymore.
doublem
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by doublem »

http://www.salon.com/news/media_critici ... k_open2010" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
For a year, national reporters (with help from conservative talk-radio goons) have depicted the center-right Obama administration and its corporatist policies as quasi-Marxist. We've heard that a government-run public healthcare option is a "liberal" cause, even as polls confirm that most Americans -- not just liberals -- support the idea. We're told that legislators backing no-strings-attached bank bailouts are mainstream "centrists," while bailout opponents are extremists -- even as public opinion surveys say the opposite.
Guinness
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 11465
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:30 am
Location: At the pub

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by Guinness »

doublem wrote:http://www.salon.com/news/media_critici ... k_open2010
For a year, national reporters (with help from conservative talk-radio goons) have depicted the center-right Obama administration and its corporatist policies as quasi-Marxist. We've heard that a government-run public healthcare option is a "liberal" cause, even as polls confirm that most Americans -- not just liberals -- support the idea. We're told that legislators backing no-strings-attached bank bailouts are mainstream "centrists," while bailout opponents are extremists -- even as public opinion surveys say the opposite.
Disappointingly boring use of the old left/right paradigm.
doublem
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by doublem »

Guinness wrote:
doublem wrote:http://www.salon.com/news/media_critici ... k_open2010
For a year, national reporters (with help from conservative talk-radio goons) have depicted the center-right Obama administration and its corporatist policies as quasi-Marxist. We've heard that a government-run public healthcare option is a "liberal" cause, even as polls confirm that most Americans -- not just liberals -- support the idea. We're told that legislators backing no-strings-attached bank bailouts are mainstream "centrists," while bailout opponents are extremists -- even as public opinion surveys say the opposite.
Disappointingly boring use of the old left/right paradigm.
But when people claim Obama is a far left Marxist it kind of skews someone that is on the left and what the left is becasue Obama is not one.
Geezer
AHL Hall of Famer
AHL Hall of Famer
Posts: 8933
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:24 am

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by Geezer »

For a year, national reporters (with help from conservative talk-radio goons) have depicted the center-right Obama administration and its corporatist policies as quasi-Marxist. We've heard that a government-run public healthcare option is a "liberal" cause, even as polls confirm that most Americans -- not just liberals -- support the idea. We're told that legislators backing no-strings-attached bank bailouts are mainstream "centrists," while bailout opponents are extremists -- even as public opinion surveys say the opposite.
[/quote]

Disappointingly boring use of the old left/right paradigm.[/quote]

But when people claim Obama is a far left Marxist it kind of skews someone that is on the left and what the left is becasue Obama is not one.[/quote]
Obama was credited / disredited , depending on your politics,as having the most liberal voting record in the Senate. He ran on the "leftiest" platform since George McGovern. He's to the left of McGovern but that should be viewed from the fact that in the 36 years between those elections the country in general has moved further to the left. Obama is trying to have the government run healthcare, adopt cap & trade, is dedicated to redistribution of wealth in America and backs unions more than any WH since LBJ.His cabinet and czar choices further prove his far leftist credentials. And he's center - right in your view? Who's a centrist in doublem world ; Hugo Chavez?
doublem
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by doublem »

Geezer wrote:
For a year, national reporters (with help from conservative talk-radio goons) have depicted the center-right Obama administration and its corporatist policies as quasi-Marxist. We've heard that a government-run public healthcare option is a "liberal" cause, even as polls confirm that most Americans -- not just liberals -- support the idea. We're told that legislators backing no-strings-attached bank bailouts are mainstream "centrists," while bailout opponents are extremists -- even as public opinion surveys say the opposite.
Disappointingly boring use of the old left/right paradigm.[/quote]

But when people claim Obama is a far left Marxist it kind of skews someone that is on the left and what the left is becasue Obama is not one.[/quote]
Obama was credited / disredited , depending on your politics,as having the most liberal voting record in the Senate. He ran on the "leftiest" platform since George McGovern. He's to the left of McGovern but that should be viewed from the fact that in the 36 years between those elections the country in general has moved further to the left. Obama is trying to have the government run healthcare, adopt cap & trade, is dedicated to redistribution of wealth in America and backs unions more than any WH since LBJ.His cabinet and czar choices further prove his far leftist credentials. And he's center - right in your view? Who's a centrist in doublem world ; Hugo Chavez?[/quote]

Puh leaasee. Kind of proves my point thank you very much. :pop:
Geezer
AHL Hall of Famer
AHL Hall of Famer
Posts: 8933
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:24 am

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by Geezer »

Anyone in this thread consider Obama as center right?
doublem
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by doublem »

Geezer wrote:Anyone in this thread consider Obama as center right?

OHHHHHHoho MEEEEEE, COACH, Put me in. :scared: It kind of shows how to the right the majority of people are.
cs6687
AHL All-Star
AHL All-Star
Posts: 6188
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:02 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by cs6687 »

doublem wrote:
Geezer wrote:Anyone in this thread consider Obama as center right?

OHHHHHHoho MEEEEEE, COACH, Put me in. :scared: It kind of shows how to the right the majority of people are.
And that's a bad thing?
shafnutz05
NHL First Liner
NHL First Liner
Posts: 60559
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
Location: Amish Country

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by shafnutz05 »

I find it utterly hilarious people refer to Obama as "center-right".
Guinness
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 11465
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:30 am
Location: At the pub

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by Guinness »

doublem wrote:
Guinness wrote:
Disappointingly boring use of the old left/right paradigm.
But when people claim Obama is a far left Marxist it kind of skews someone that is on the left and what the left is becasue Obama is not one.
Statism is on the left. Therefore, Obama is a leftist. ;) :pop:
Guinness
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 11465
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:30 am
Location: At the pub

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by Guinness »

doublem wrote:http://www.salon.com/news/media_critici ... k_open2010
For a year, national reporters (with help from conservative talk-radio goons) have depicted the center-right Obama administration and its corporatist policies as quasi-Marxist. We've heard that a government-run public healthcare option is a "liberal" cause, even as polls confirm that most Americans -- not just liberals -- support the idea. We're told that legislators backing no-strings-attached bank bailouts are mainstream "centrists," while bailout opponents are extremists -- even as public opinion surveys say the opposite.
How nice (and unsurprising) to learn, by the way, that a majority of Americans support enlisting the only agency in society with the socially sanctioned authority to commit armed robbery in order to secure some particular good for themselves.

I guess that settles that matter. :roll:
Last edited by Guinness on Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Guinness
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 11465
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:30 am
Location: At the pub

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by Guinness »

doublem wrote:
Guinness wrote:
Disappointingly boring use of the old left/right paradigm.
But when people claim Obama is a far left Marxist it kind of skews someone that is on the left and what the left is becasue Obama is not one.
:lol: By the way, wasn't it you who was saying that GWB's presidency had finally discredited "conservatism"? I guess then, by that logic, we can put "liberalism" to bed, too, right? :)
doublem
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by doublem »

Guinness wrote:
doublem wrote:
Guinness wrote:
Disappointingly boring use of the old left/right paradigm.
But when people claim Obama is a far left Marxist it kind of skews someone that is on the left and what the left is becasue Obama is not one.
:lol: By the way, wasn't it you who was saying that GWB's presidency had finally discredited "conservatism"? I guess then, by that logic, we can put "liberalism" to bed, too, right? :)
Sure, it's fine with me becasue Obama isn't to the left at all on anything important anyways. He is part of the same problem that has been going on for decades. Doesn't really matter to me either way. :D
shafnutz05
NHL First Liner
NHL First Liner
Posts: 60559
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
Location: Amish Country

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by shafnutz05 »

Obama had the most liberal voting record in the United States Senate.

He supports nationalized healthcare, is bought and paid for by labor unions, supports amnesty, supports cap and trade legislation, is a fighter for increased taxes, spends taxpayer dollars like they are going out of style, etc etc etc etc

To suggest that Obama is somehow not far-left and/or liberal is the most asinine thing I have ever heard. Bill Clinton realized that it was vital to follow "the third way"....Barack Obama believes in "his own way or the highway".
doublem
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by doublem »

cs6687 wrote:
doublem wrote:
Geezer wrote:Anyone in this thread consider Obama as center right?

OHHHHHHoho MEEEEEE, COACH, Put me in. :scared: It kind of shows how to the right the majority of people are.
And that's a bad thing?
No, just don't tell me we are on our way to a socialist paradise and the crazy lefties are taking over. I think its pretty clear that the country is pretty to the right, particularly on economic issues.
doublem
NHL Healthy Scratch
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm

Re: LGP Politcal Discussion Thread

Post by doublem »

shafnutz05 wrote:Obama had the most liberal voting record in the United States Senate.

He supports nationalized healthcare, is bought and paid for by labor unions, supports amnesty, supports cap and trade legislation, is a fighter for increased taxes, spends taxpayer dollars like they are going out of style, etc etc etc etc

To suggest that Obama is somehow not far-left and/or liberal is the most asinine thing I have ever heard. Bill Clinton realized that it was vital to follow "the third way"....Barack Obama believes in "his own way or the highway".
All of those things are untrue at one level or another. The United States does not have nationalized health care and all those other things you listed are pretty much in line with about the last 5 or so presidents.