You just had to type that as I was doing my research.
Sorry.
But I don't know what else to say at this point. I'm not just naming these two for the sake of naming them, I really really believe they're jellies. I've never been so sure that I was right in all my games playing and I don't understand why others aren't seeing what I am from those two...
i'm willing to trust ya for a day. Make a choice and i'll back ya
Agreed. I know I've asked the village to trust me before and will always be glad to return the favor.
1) I am worried about Pavel still being in the game.
2) I am not sold on THG being Spongebob... it sounds more like they're trying to buy him another day -- jelly investigator perhaps?
shafnutz05 wrote:I can tell you right now that Pavel is NOT a jelly....I asked a question that was designed to sound shady to see if he was good or bad. His answer made me confident that (at least two day cycles ago), he was clean. For now, I am willing to vouch for him. He mentioned that he has been very busy.
"So, how do you think we are doing so far....just lying low for the time being?"
He responded with saying that he was concerned about a couple people that were targeted those he was convinced were villagers, but he didn't have enough to "go on" yet. To me, that screams villager. I asked the question in a way that he would feel comfortable answering regardless of what side he was on.
1) I am worried about Pavel still being in the game.
2) I am not sold on THG being Spongebob... it sounds more like they're trying to buy him another day -- jelly investigator perhaps?
Very interesting point, tfrizz....very interesting indeed.
"So, how do you think we are doing so far....just lying low for the time being?"
He responded with saying that he was concerned about a couple people that were targeted those he was convinced were villagers, but he didn't have enough to "go on" yet. To me, that screams villager. I asked the question in a way that he would feel comfortable answering regardless of what side he was on.
yea but you are currently sleeping with men....so i trust nothing you say
"So, how do you think we are doing so far....just lying low for the time being?"
He responded with saying that he was concerned about a couple people that were targeted those he was convinced were villagers, but he didn't have enough to "go on" yet. To me, that screams villager. I asked the question in a way that he would feel comfortable answering regardless of what side he was on.
I dunno, man...that question isn't that hard to see through. Plus, if he is a bad guy...he's going to know you're not on his team, so why would he tell you anything?
"So, how do you think we are doing so far....just lying low for the time being?"
He responded with saying that he was concerned about a couple people that were targeted those he was convinced were villagers, but he didn't have enough to "go on" yet. To me, that screams villager. I asked the question in a way that he would feel comfortable answering regardless of what side he was on.
I dunno, man...that question isn't that hard to see through. Plus, if he is a bad guy...he's going to know you're not on his team, so why would he tell you anything?
I don't buy this for one second.
This much is true........................facepalm for not thinking about the fact the baddies know who is on their team.
1) I am worried about Pavel still being in the game.
2) I am not sold on THG being Spongebob... it sounds more like they're trying to buy him another day -- jelly investigator perhaps?
See, I got the impression that Azkar was implying he was the spongebob earlier in the day.
jaysmiter wrote:Well, her (now known to be) dying words were "go after hockeynut"...so...I guess, knowing that she is/was good, I'm for this.
net hockeynut
I guess this fully exonerates Azkar (dammit).
jaysmiter wrote:That's actually a good point.
release hockeynut net thg
jaysmiter wrote:net cupkeeper
Here's the facts...
He has 12 posts.
Of those 12:
4 were jumping on a bandwagon vote of a good person.
1 was the removal of the thg vote after the bandwagon was stalling.
3 posts contribute nothing to anything.
1 post was a response to use going back in time on day 1.
1 was a vote count
1 was his little rant about starting a bandwagon that conveniently was posted while one was already started.
1 was trying to make sense of something Corvi did in the write-up or before the write up.
jaysmiter wrote:net canaan
I'm with you, WF. If THG doesn't take Pavel out tonight...or it seems like there wasn't an attempt on him tonight...we'll deal with the consequences.
Oh, Canaan...I know I'm switching a lot. I'm just frustrated and reactionary. Should know that by now.
I'm not going to say I won't switch again, because I'd be lying. I just honestly have no idea what to do...it just seems like everytime there is a vote for Pavel, someone magically disrupts it. If WF is suspicious of you and him, and we can trust THG to get Pavel tonight, I'm going after you. I told her I'd trust her.
Looking back through some posts, I am willing to trust my seashell buddy on this one. Something about crayz's posts strikes me as very odd. I would also keep a very close eye on jwienand, who is going under the radar. He changed his vote a solid 3 or 4 times on the Zarovich vote, and he was posting much more than he normally does.
This bacon is salty.