imo...Malka screwed up...but it all comes down to Corvi saying different terminology was used. It wasn't about posting PM's it was about clarifying a mistake that was made.
I have no idea what kinda crazy move crayz was pulling off or what the intent was, but im not convinced atoll (get it--island joke?) release THG net crayz
Twisted Wrister wrote:actually they are not, I checked my PM and was just straight up told that I have a seashell buddy. Not a single comment about regular villager or tourist. Just a straight up you have a seashell buddy. If that person would like to come out and help claim my innocents go ahead. But you just scream of bad RP.
That's exactly what mine said. No mention of either villager or tourist.
ok makes a little more sense now. if Corvi sent yours and didn't mention it...TWC sent mine and others and did mention it.
crayz wrote:imo...Malka screwed up...but it all comes down to Corvi saying different terminology was used. It wasn't about posting PM's it was about clarifying a mistake that was made.
I screwed up but asked to be autkilled via pm to mods. I ruined a part of the game that shouldn't have been so. I apologize to everyone.
crayz wrote:imo...Malka screwed up...but it all comes down to Corvi saying different terminology was used. It wasn't about posting PM's it was about clarifying a mistake that was made.
i know malkamaniac's intent, but, for the integrity of the game, no one should be posting their role pm--it was a written rule. i dont want to lose malks (bc i know hes a villager/tourist/traveler) but it isn't exactly fair for the slimy vermin were trying to extinguish. id rather lose than win by circumventing the rules--even if it were a mistake.
crayz wrote:imo...Malka screwed up...but it all comes down to Corvi saying different terminology was used. It wasn't about posting PM's it was about clarifying a mistake that was made.
i know malkamaniac's intent, but, for the integrity of the game, no one should be posting their role pm--it was a written rule. i dont want to lose malks (bc i know hes a villager/tourist/traveler) but it isn't exactly fair for the slimy vermin were trying to extinguish. id rather lose than win by circumventing the rules--even if it were a mistake.
/rant
exactly. I have no idea what I was thinking. It was an incredibly stupid move.
crayz wrote:imo...Malka screwed up...but it all comes down to Corvi saying different terminology was used. It wasn't about posting PM's it was about clarifying a mistake that was made.
i know malkamaniac's intent, but, for the integrity of the game, no one should be posting their role pm--it was a written rule. i dont want to lose malks (bc i know hes a villager/tourist/traveler) but it isn't exactly fair for the slimy vermin were trying to extinguish. id rather lose than win by circumventing the rules--even if it were a mistake.
/rant
crayz, you are also the one posting information from your PM first, so not only Malka screwed up...
crayz wrote:imo...Malka screwed up...but it all comes down to Corvi saying different terminology was used. It wasn't about posting PM's it was about clarifying a mistake that was made.
i know malkamaniac's intent, but, for the integrity of the game, no one should be posting their role pm--it was a written rule. i dont want to lose malks (bc i know hes a villager/tourist/traveler) but it isn't exactly fair for the slimy vermin were trying to extinguish. id rather lose than win by circumventing the rules--even if it were a mistake.
/rant
yea....i guess, just kinda
People have been posting bits from their PM since day 1 (just not posting the exact message)...
crayz wrote:imo...Malka screwed up...but it all comes down to Corvi saying different terminology was used. It wasn't about posting PM's it was about clarifying a mistake that was made.
i know malkamaniac's intent, but, for the integrity of the game, no one should be posting their role pm--it was a written rule. i dont want to lose malks (bc i know hes a villager/tourist/traveler) but it isn't exactly fair for the slimy vermin were trying to extinguish. id rather lose than win by circumventing the rules--even if it were a mistake.
/rant
crayz, you are also the one posting information from your PM first, so not only Malka screwed up...
So ,if that is the case, everyone who has mentioned "sea shell buddy" and their buddy's name screwed up? I assume the mods didn't plan on that being outed on day 1 and everyone realizing that everyone had a sea shell buddy.
canaan wrote:i cant believe i used "integrity of the game" talking about "jellyfish invasion I"
unreal.
It's true though. Everyone has been posting bits and pieces, and I should of re-worded it. It's not needed should it of been said. I'm either auto killed or bowing out of the game. Sorry gang, good luck village!
IrishEyes wrote:Perhaps no PM talk of any kind should be allowed. That way nothing like this will happen again. I know I helped, to clarify the PM issue.
What draws the line though. Let's say for example you are the Seer of a game...if you are on the chop block, should you be allowed to come out and say it? Even though it was in your PM?
IrishEyes wrote:Perhaps no PM talk of any kind should be allowed. That way nothing like this will happen again. I know I helped, to clarify the PM issue.
What draws the line though. Let's say for example you are the Seer of a game...if you are on the chop block, should you be allowed to come out and say it? Even though it was in your PM?
i think this comes down to copying your pm and posting it. revealing your role is your choice. revealing the sea shell buddy thing was a choice that, from my knowledge, is within the rules.
IrishEyes wrote:Perhaps no PM talk of any kind should be allowed. That way nothing like this will happen again. I know I helped, to clarify the PM issue.
What draws the line though. Let's say for example you are the Seer of a game...if you are on the chop block, should you be allowed to come out and say it? Even though it was in your PM?
I'm talking about the posts that go "but in my PM it said..."
And I'm not throwing you under the bus. It was a litigimate question that you had, but that's sort of what started the whole thing.
crayz wrote:imo...Malka screwed up...but it all comes down to Corvi saying different terminology was used. It wasn't about posting PM's it was about clarifying a mistake that was made.
i know malkamaniac's intent, but, for the integrity of the game, no one should be posting their role pm--it was a written rule. i dont want to lose malks (bc i know hes a villager/tourist/traveler) but it isn't exactly fair for the slimy vermin were trying to extinguish. id rather lose than win by circumventing the rules--even if it were a mistake.
/rant
crayz, you are also the one posting information from your PM first, so not only Malka screwed up...
Saying what a pm said is different from copying and pasting a pm, I think.
IrishEyes wrote:Perhaps no PM talk of any kind should be allowed. That way nothing like this will happen again. I know I helped, to clarify the PM issue.
What draws the line though. Let's say for example you are the Seer of a game...if you are on the chop block, should you be allowed to come out and say it? Even though it was in your PM?
I'm talking about the posts that go "but in my PM it said..."
And I'm not throwing you under the bus. It was a litigimate question that you had, but that's sort of what started the whole thing.
But anyone can say, "but in my pm it said...." and make up whatever. It's different when you copy and paste a pm which other people can compare directly to their own pm.
