Promoting yourself much?count2infinity wrote:you guys can get rid of me if you like, but keep in mind i'm one of the most active posters since i've started playing these games... i post like crazy in here and spark a good bit of conversation.
My opinion is, and has been, we know the consequences. If anyone is stupid enough to give anything away, they deserve what they get.redwill wrote:I 100% agree that night-talking is bad. However, many have defended it. For example, I think it was in the game I modded (SWIII) that dagny vehemently defended night-talking.Juice wrote:even if count2infinity is a good guy, we're getting rid of someone that couldn't see why what they were saying was bad. How is that a bad thing?
count2infinity has been an active player in past games. Even if he's bad, he puts info out there.
I'm currently in the position that I won't vote for Senka but don't really want to vote for poor thg. And c2i isn't a good option, IMO. So I'll reluctantly stick with thg for now unless new info comes up.
It's actually starting to get on my nerves.Kicksave wrote:I've always been sent to that other screen.
I never said you had a 50/50% of getting red/black in roulette. I said you had the same odds as last time.Senka wrote:Azkar wrote:
Statistically you still have the same chance of red coming up again. You have a 50% chance every time you flip a coin for it to be heads or tails. Just because you flipped and got heads last flip doesn't mean that you only have a 25% chance of getting heads again.
actually thats not true. Not true at all "Mr. Statistics"... Since there are 2 green spaces in roulette, you have an 18/38 chance of red or black.... That is 47%.
And as far as flipping a coin goes, most coins are weighted to one side. If you flip it 1000 times and it goes heads 600, youd say its slightly weighted to fall on heads.. Look man its just what i learned.
/pwnage
count2infinity wrote:i'll be back on in a bit... need to teach a class [on how to manipulate people into believing what you want them to. Similar to a jellyfish invasion].
I was just about to yell at you.Senka wrote:and for the record i just deleted a post .. I posted the count wrong and halfway done instead of COPYING it to the next page. so i deleted it and redid it (in 3 seconds) it was just the coded count. But i dont wanna look shady to someone if they noticed me do it. I figured itd be too much confusion if a wrong vote count was up.
...or yeah, what she said.dagny wrote:DO NOT EDIT YOUR POSTS!!! MAKE A NEW ONE!
I actually think it's a good reason. We get a picture of where everyone stands in the world by each person's posting. The more one posts, the clearer the picture becomes. Those players who rarely post are the ones that cause difficulty in fleshing out the whole picture.wallflower wrote:This is really poor reasoning for keeping someone around. You're making me reconsider my thg vote...and that's impressive.count2infinity wrote:you guys can get rid of me if you like, but keep in mind i'm one of the most active posters since i've started playing these games... i post like crazy in here and spark a good bit of conversation.
i was trying to save you..thehockeyguru wrote:I dont like all this back and forth voting on me. If you are going to bandwagon someone why not just get it over with?
Then perhaps I wasn't talking to you, hmmmmm...... perhaps I was talking to a certain Hockeynut!Senka wrote:Dagny -- i didnt edit? i was simply editing his post into a new one... ??
+1dagny wrote:It's actually starting to get on my nerves.Kicksave wrote:I've always been sent to that other screen.
sometimes you gotta do what you gotta doSenka wrote:Azkar. I hate you. lol
THE MAN taught me it was important. sooo you calling him a liar? Hard going to his office to pick up a major and call him a LIAR.
Senka is a good player, but dangerous because of that... however, I've got no issue keeping him around since he's a contributer. I'm also in favor of letting THG have a chance to play, unless he messed up again.