Not what I read:JoseCuervo wrote: I didn't accuse you. I said WF was one. And if she turned out to be one, then I'd go after you.
http://www.letsgopens.com/scripts/phpBB ... 5#p1013823" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Not what I read:JoseCuervo wrote: I didn't accuse you. I said WF was one. And if she turned out to be one, then I'd go after you.
I voted for JC since day 1 btw.npv708 wrote:I looked back at the crayz vote and noticed something. IE wasn't alone in her original vote against JC, which makes me suspicious of that person, who just happens to be someone I've been suspicious of all along. If the slugs didn't convert at least two of JC, PFIDC, Juice, Senka, MWB, they would be a little weak in terms of strategery. PFIDC knows what he's doing and I'm hoping I do too now...
salt PFIDC
slugfinder 2001?Troy Loney wrote:intuition...you noob!!!MWB wrote:Aren't we supposed to find some way to base our vote? If we're not going to look at voting patterns and what people say, what are we supposed to do?Malkamaniac wrote:I think the word slug is used to much.
If you don't vote for so and so, your a slug!
If you bandwagon your a slug!
If you say one random thing that someone doesn't like your a slug!
MWB wrote:Aren't we supposed to find some way to base our vote? If we're not going to look at voting patterns and what people say, what are we supposed to do?Malkamaniac wrote:I think the word slug is used to much.
If you don't vote for so and so, your a slug!
If you bandwagon your a slug!
If you say one random thing that someone doesn't like your a slug!
you made the Middle school-esque mistake 3 times in one post. I'll let it slide once, but that was epic fail at grammar.Malkamaniac wrote:JoseCuervo wrote:sounds like "you're" a slugMalkamaniac wrote:I think the word slug is used to much.
If you don't vote for so and so, your a slug!
If you bandwagon your a slug!
If you say one random thing that someone doesn't like your a slug!
sure thing, I made a mistake.
You moved away from JC because he said he was in class? Why believe that?PensFanInDC wrote: I did not notice the post where JC said he was in class a lot and his lack of posting made me suspicious of him. When I realized he was now in class I changed my mind.
Heaven forbid.you made the Middle school-esque mistake 3 times in one post. I'll let it slide once, but that was epic fail at grammar.
because I've even posted my times when I'd be in class, maybe? Want a schedule?MWB wrote:You moved away from JC because he said he was in class? Why believe that?PensFanInDC wrote: I did not notice the post where JC said he was in class a lot and his lack of posting made me suspicious of him. When I realized he was now in class I changed my mind.
lol...wuut??toodles!
ON OFFICIAL UNIVERSITY LETTERHEAD PLEASE!!!!!JoseCuervo wrote:because I've even posted my times when I'd be in class, maybe? Want a schedule?MWB wrote:You moved away from JC because he said he was in class? Why believe that?PensFanInDC wrote: I did not notice the post where JC said he was in class a lot and his lack of posting made me suspicious of him. When I realized he was now in class I changed my mind.
well... I do think you're both slugs. Just thought wallflower was a safer vote.the wicked child wrote:Not what I read:JoseCuervo wrote: I didn't accuse you. I said WF was one. And if she turned out to be one, then I'd go after you.
http://www.letsgopens.com/scripts/phpBB ... 5#p1013823" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I can get you a screenshot.Troy Loney wrote:ON OFFICIAL UNIVERSITY LETTERHEAD PLEASE!!!!!JoseCuervo wrote:
because I've even posted my times when I'd be in class, maybe? Want a schedule?
NOTARIZED UNIVERSITY LETTERHEAD!!!!I can get you a screenshot.
To me this holds no more water than anyone else's "schedule." People (including me) are saying all the time that they're leaving for work or class or to run errands, but I that can't necessarily be taken at face value. I'm sure most of the time it's true, but I wouldn't change my voting thought just because someone said they weren't around.JoseCuervo wrote:because I've even posted my times when I'd be in class, maybe? Want a schedule?MWB wrote:You moved away from JC because he said he was in class? Why believe that?PensFanInDC wrote: I did not notice the post where JC said he was in class a lot and his lack of posting made me suspicious of him. When I realized he was now in class I changed my mind.
and some sort of indication from the professor that you were in attendance.Troy Loney wrote:NOTARIZED UNIVERSITY LETTERHEAD!!!!I can get you a screenshot.
too much... but I'll post my schedule anyway so people know.Troy Loney wrote:and some sort of indication from the professor that you were in attendance.Troy Loney wrote:NOTARIZED UNIVERSITY LETTERHEAD!!!!I can get you a screenshot.
okay:MWB wrote:To me this holds no more water than anyone else's "schedule." People (including me) are saying all the time that they're leaving for work or class or to run errands, but I that can't necessarily be taken at face value. I'm sure most of the time it's true, but I wouldn't change my voting thought just because someone said they weren't around.JoseCuervo wrote: because I've even posted my times when I'd be in class, maybe? Want a schedule?
Do you have a laptop?JoseCuervo wrote:
too much... but I'll post my schedule anyway so people know.
No pun intended.MWB wrote:My only point is that when anyone says they are in such and such a place it should be taken with a grain of salt in this game.
yea, but it's too big to carry to class. I also pay attention in class and get good grades.MWB wrote:Do you have a laptop?JoseCuervo wrote:
too much... but I'll post my schedule anyway so people know.