What caught my eye with the LITT vote was that right after he came out and said he wouldn't be around ect., crayz and MWB hoped right on as if their vote was now legitimate. A vote on either of them makes the most sense at this point.
slappybrown wrote:lulz @ thg. Dude can you not just read the thread? THere are three votes for him. All of which came in the previous 5 posts. He doesnt even have the most posts. You crack me up sometimes.
I read the thread, I just get a bit suspicious when another bandwagon vote pops out of nowhere especially that quickly.
I do too, especially when its someone that typically gets voted out early on a regular basis. It's an easy way out and a lot of times baddies jump aboard it so no explanation has to be made.
thehockeyguru wrote:What caught my eye with the LITT vote was that right after he came out and said he wouldn't be around ect., crayz and MWB hoped right on as if their vote was now legitimate. A vote on either of them makes the most sense at this point.
kind of like how pfidc said he was more confident in his vote for me because of perceived "smugness"
thehockeyguru wrote:What caught my eye with the LITT vote was that right after he came out and said he wouldn't be around ect., crayz and MWB hoped right on as if their vote was now legitimate. A vote on either of them makes the most sense at this point.
kind of like how pfidc said he was more confident in his vote for me because of perceived "smugness"
MWB didnt attack anyone or called his name just posted a nonsense "well if he's voting for himself" comment.
thehockeyguru wrote:What caught my eye with the LITT vote was that right after he came out and said he wouldn't be around ect., crayz and MWB hoped right on as if their vote was now legitimate. A vote on either of them makes the most sense at this point.
I hopped on the vote when I read that he voted for himself and also stated he wouldn't be around. Why do we need someone who wants out and might not be here later in the game?
thehockeyguru wrote:What caught my eye with the LITT vote was that right after he came out and said he wouldn't be around ect., crayz and MWB hoped right on as if their vote was now legitimate. A vote on either of them makes the most sense at this point.
kind of like how pfidc said he was more confident in his vote for me because of perceived "smugness"
MWB didnt attack anyone or called his name just posted a nonsense "well if he's voting for himself" comment.
thehockeyguru wrote:What caught my eye with the LITT vote was that right after he came out and said he wouldn't be around ect., crayz and MWB hoped right on as if their vote was now legitimate. A vote on either of them makes the most sense at this point.
huh? I voted cause its a day 1 bandwagon...like every day one.
Now when he says he can't play anyway....it makes sense to kill him no? Or do you like waiting hours upon hours for people who cant play to make votes.
thehockeyguru wrote:What caught my eye with the LITT vote was that right after he came out and said he wouldn't be around ect., crayz and MWB hoped right on as if their vote was now legitimate. A vote on either of them makes the most sense at this point.
huh? I voted cause its a day 1 bandwagon...like every day one.
Now when he says he can't play anyway....it makes sense to kill him no? Or do you like waiting hours upon hours for people who cant play to make votes.
Have to agree.....once LITT said he wanted out why not make it quick?
thehockeyguru wrote:What caught my eye with the LITT vote was that right after he came out and said he wouldn't be around ect., crayz and MWB hoped right on as if their vote was now legitimate. A vote on either of them makes the most sense at this point.
huh? I voted cause its a day 1 bandwagon...like every day one.
Now when he says he can't play anyway....it makes sense to kill him no? Or do you like waiting hours upon hours for people who cant play to make votes.
thehockeyguru wrote:What caught my eye with the LITT vote was that right after he came out and said he wouldn't be around ect., crayz and MWB hoped right on as if their vote was now legitimate. A vote on either of them makes the most sense at this point.
huh? I voted cause its a day 1 bandwagon...like every day one.
Now when he says he can't play anyway....it makes sense to kill him no? Or do you like waiting hours upon hours for people who cant play to make votes.
I have no problem with a day 1 bandwagon or voting for someone who will be inactive. But to come out and vote for that person a min or two after they post that they wont be around makes me think a baddie can use that as excuse to hop on a bandwagon and not look suspicious.
I am interested in hearing why Canaan voted for crayz on day 1 like i did. was he thinking the same thing?
THG is intriguing because he's throwing out stuff that doesn't make sense. Not sure I want to vote Troy right now. Malka... just seems like a random vote thrown out. Same with pittsport. Not unusual for second day votes. I don't really get doublem jumping on the vote for me when there were already two bandwagons rolling though. Could be a baddie move just trying to cause more chaos.
