Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
So what are we going to do here gents? Go for a silent player or take a stab at one of us?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
You have a 50/50 shot on ps87.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
You're advocating a 50/50 gamble on killing a green? Really?columbia wrote:You have a 50/50 shot on ps87.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
He did? I completely missed that.Willie Kool wrote:No, and redwill said it first but won't talk about it.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
Willie Kool wrote:You're advocating a 50/50 gamble on killing a green? Really?columbia wrote:You have a 50/50 shot on ps87.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
Really? It was in a conversation with you.MWB wrote:He did? I completely missed that.Willie Kool wrote:No, and redwill said it first but won't talk about it.
redwill wrote:I thought he was red. He's not. He's blue.MWB wrote:A mistake how?redwill wrote:The shaf vote was a mistake.
I will not answer any questions about how I know that.
But it's true.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
I don't think he's green; we obviously differ.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
Yeah, just checked the red will thing. Forgot about that. Columbia, can you communicate with red will? And did he tell you shaf was blue, or did you know that already?
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
I don't totally trust him, but no one has disputed his angel claim either.columbia wrote:I don't think he's green; we obviously differ.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
Do you have any more information than any of us on ps87? If not, voting for him makes zero sense.columbia wrote:I don't think he's green; we obviously differ.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
I'd like to hear more from goucho on his case for not believing columbia
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:39 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
i suggested before that perhaps the vig shot at the angel, i still think this is likely what happened so i'm hesitant to put any votes on ps87 at this point. Willie is still trying really hard to head a charge against others which is furthering my suspicions
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 44375
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Ignoranti
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
ps87's role claim was very specific. Fwiw, it seemed more plausible to me than columbia's claim.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
Just laying out the facts as I see them.the errey i breathe wrote:Willie is still trying really hard to head a charge against others which is furthering my suspicions
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
I think Benny's the way to go. Already outlined some of it, but found something else looking back. He voted for redwill early after he came back. I also expressed my concern, but I think Benny tries to get a quick vote through, knowing that he must be green.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
They're probably both being truthful.Gaucho wrote:ps87's role claim was very specific. Fwiw, it seemed more plausible to me than columbia's claim.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 44375
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Ignoranti
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
Again, it seemed like a strange time for that claim and it also seemed unnecessary to expose redwill at the same time. Didn't make sense to me.Benny Fitz wrote:I'd like to hear more from goucho on his case for not believing columbia
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
teib - do you not see the inconsistency to TH24's story? If I was randomly going after someone, fine. I'm just a blue that was ****** off about non participation. And I happened to turn up what I think is some pretty damning evidence against TH24.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 44375
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Ignoranti
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
Hopefully not.MWB wrote:They're probably both being truthful.Gaucho wrote:ps87's role claim was very specific. Fwiw, it seemed more plausible to me than columbia's claim.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
Willie definitely isn't a red. Just an over zealous villager who thinks he has cracke allot codes, IMO.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:39 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
It's damning because you were already looking at him so anything will look to be 'proof' I've never been a fan of voting for people based on posting patterns. I'd rather look at the voting history and look for trends. If his forgetting about the game is proof for you then vote that way.Willie Kool wrote:teib - do you not see the inconsistency to TH24's story? If I was randomly going after someone, fine. I'm just a blue that was ****** off about non participation. And I happened to turn up what I think is some pretty damning evidence against TH24.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
Benny or Doc is how I'm voting. Doc put an early vote on Kraftster (first page), which at the time I thought was odd, and his explanation was pretty weak. He may have been trying to get a good player out with a quick day one bandwagon. He also put in votes for redwill early on. Other than that, he hasn't had much to say.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
My last post will be interpretted by Willie: "hammer is red because he knows I outted him and now is trying to side with me to act like he's good. I figured it all put!!!"
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
FWIW, kraft was a non participant in re game doc ran so it may have been carry over. I'm only through page 7 and then 16 on but Bennys redwill votes were strange because if a red knew he wasn't red when he came back, then they would want to kill instantly. But again, that seems obvious and super risky.MWB wrote:Benny or Doc is how I'm voting. Doc put an early vote on Kraftster (first page), which at the time I thought was odd, and his explanation was pretty weak. He may have been trying to get a good player out with a quick day one bandwagon. He also put in votes for redwill early on. Other than that, he hasn't had much to say.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Mad Scientist Warz Game Thread
I'm basing it on his acknowledging the game starts 'tomorrow morning' and then saying he forgot. The posting patterns just back it up.the errey i breathe wrote:It's damning because you were already looking at him so anything will look to be 'proof' I've never been a fan of voting for people based on posting patterns.