***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
man the vote is all over the place... i dont think were getting anywhere anytime soon so im gonna hold off on voting until later
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14111
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:47 am
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
yeah, that'll speed things upmac5155 wrote:man the vote is all over the place... i dont think were getting anywhere anytime soon so im gonna hold off on voting until later
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
I dont know that Ive ever seen so much voting over the weekend. Active baddies this game I see.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
who said I'm in a hurry?Corvidae wrote:yeah, that'll speed things up :pop:mac5155 wrote:man the vote is all over the place... i dont think were getting anywhere anytime soon so im gonna hold off on voting until later
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
feed redwill
tip relantel
tip relantel
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
wow...votes everywhere over the weekend... quiet people + early in the game = my vote every time.
tip doublem
tip doublem
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
4 relantel (Corvi, LITT, MWB, Zaro)
4 doublem (cupkeeper, shaf, crayz, c2i)
1 MWB (Senka)
1 c2i (redwill)
1 beerman (relantel)
1 Corvi (doublem)
11 to tip.
4 doublem (cupkeeper, shaf, crayz, c2i)
1 MWB (Senka)
1 c2i (redwill)
1 beerman (relantel)
1 Corvi (doublem)
11 to tip.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
tip relantel
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
tip relantel
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17412
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:11 pm
- Location: :scared:
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
6 relantel (Corvi, LITT, MWB, Zaro, Troy, NAN)
4 doublem (cupkeeper, shaf, crayz, c2i)
1 MWB (Senka)
1 c2i (redwill)
1 beerman (relantel)
1 Corvi (doublem)
11 to tip.
4 doublem (cupkeeper, shaf, crayz, c2i)
1 MWB (Senka)
1 c2i (redwill)
1 beerman (relantel)
1 Corvi (doublem)
11 to tip.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Why is everyone voting for relantel? Just curious what everyone's reasoning is. I'm voting for doublem because he was mysteriously absent all game, and then right after I make a post pointing out this fact he reemerges "from the shadows" with some weird cryptic statement. The timing to me is suspect to say the least.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Oh, and I can't count how many times someone has finally showed up to a game after someone calls them out for being too quiet, and it turns out they were red. Usually, the worst case scenario is that they are a blue. Can't remember the last time a virtual non-participant turned out to be a good RP.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
im curious as well, but im pretty lost this game so far..
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14285
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:19 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
I like shaf's reasoning, doublem seems more suspicious to me than rel at this point
tip doublem
tip doublem
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
dagny at the beginning of this game.shafnutz05 wrote:Oh, and I can't count how many times someone has finally showed up to a game after someone calls them out for being too quiet, and it turns out they were red. Usually, the worst case scenario is that they are a blue. Can't remember the last time a virtual non-participant turned out to be a good RP.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 39689
- Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 11:13 am
- Location: Nevin Shapiro A&M
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
tip nan
dont like 'em.
dont like 'em.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
The reason I'm voting for relantel is just how the first vote and any subsequent vote he made went.
During the first vote for dags, when the train was roling, he just strayed off and voted for me for "lulz", even though there was one or two other higher vote counts. Something I've found throughout playing these games it just seems like a baddie usually will do this so there is no rhyme or reason to their voting behavior later in the game. Doesn't happen every game, but it has happened numerous times.
And then the second vote he made was using the "third person" tactic and voted for beerman.
I know it's early, but using those generic voting reasons (ie. lulz, or third person) is just an easy cop out if the heat gets on you for the reason you voted for individuals.
I could be absolutely completely wrong this time, and he may be blue or green, but I've seen those used before by baddies to make it seem like they are actively voting, yet they are also staying away from any controversy by giving a generic explanation as to why they voted that way.
During the first vote for dags, when the train was roling, he just strayed off and voted for me for "lulz", even though there was one or two other higher vote counts. Something I've found throughout playing these games it just seems like a baddie usually will do this so there is no rhyme or reason to their voting behavior later in the game. Doesn't happen every game, but it has happened numerous times.
And then the second vote he made was using the "third person" tactic and voted for beerman.
I know it's early, but using those generic voting reasons (ie. lulz, or third person) is just an easy cop out if the heat gets on you for the reason you voted for individuals.
I could be absolutely completely wrong this time, and he may be blue or green, but I've seen those used before by baddies to make it seem like they are actively voting, yet they are also staying away from any controversy by giving a generic explanation as to why they voted that way.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Way to spread out the vote even further.canaan wrote:tip nan
dont like 'em.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
ill go with
tip relantel
tip relantel
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
lol....that was the very first day bandwagon...a little different hahanewarenanow wrote:dagny at the beginning of this game.shafnutz05 wrote:Oh, and I can't count how many times someone has finally showed up to a game after someone calls them out for being too quiet, and it turns out they were red. Usually, the worst case scenario is that they are a blue. Can't remember the last time a virtual non-participant turned out to be a good RP.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
shafnutz05 wrote:Why is everyone voting for relantel?
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
These are great points to vote rel.newarenanow wrote:The reason I'm voting for relantel is just how the first vote and any subsequent vote he made went.
During the first vote for dags, when the train was roling, he just strayed off and voted for me for "lulz", even though there was one or two other higher vote counts. Something I've found throughout playing these games it just seems like a baddie usually will do this so there is no rhyme or reason to their voting behavior later in the game. Doesn't happen every game, but it has happened numerous times.
And then the second vote he made was using the "third person" tactic and voted for beerman.
I know it's early, but using those generic voting reasons (ie. lulz, or third person) is just an easy cop out if the heat gets on you for the reason you voted for individuals.
I could be absolutely completely wrong this time, and he may be blue or green, but I've seen those used before by baddies to make it seem like they are actively voting, yet they are also staying away from any controversy by giving a generic explanation as to why they voted that way.
I still think redwill is red. He is using his voting with tfrizz against c2i as a reason to vote c2i off since tfrizz was killed. This is a baddie tactic.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
I dunno...Relantel was the most outspoken person on Day 1 as far as not voting for Dagny until she had a chance to speak. Assume for a moment that the bad seer got REALLY lucky on the first day and investigated Dagny first...why would the reds (or pinks) take a risk on a strategy like that? Knocking out the good angel is HUGE, and can be very difficult to do if you are bad. If he was bad, I really don't understand why he would defend Dagny on the first day.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
For the very reason that is causing you to look away from him.shafnutz05 wrote:I dunno...Relantel was the most outspoken person on Day 1 as far as not voting for Dagny until she had a chance to speak. Assume for a moment that the bad seer got REALLY lucky on the first day and investigated Dagny first...why would the reds (or pinks) take a risk on a strategy like that? Knocking out the good angel is HUGE, and can be very difficult to do if you are bad. If he was bad, I really don't understand why he would defend Dagny on the first day.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: ***BARNYARD BATTLE GAME THREAD***
Yeah, I know. I just thought it was funny.shafnutz05 wrote:lol....that was the very first day bandwagon...a little different hahanewarenanow wrote:dagny at the beginning of this game.shafnutz05 wrote:Oh, and I can't count how many times someone has finally showed up to a game after someone calls them out for being too quiet, and it turns out they were red. Usually, the worst case scenario is that they are a blue. Can't remember the last time a virtual non-participant turned out to be a good RP.