thehockeyguru wrote:
Lol. Why would the colors be for show?
So the fact that ulf and dodint were BLUE VILLAGERS is somehow negated by a Warz mod's artistic license?
Did you read the sign up? Imo, the villagers can get powers. I think the colors reflect a sort of bond much like masons in past games
Good point
Majority votes to kill
No Majority is reached and it'll be a weighted random.org Power-ups and weapons will be handed out at the start of the game, please check your personal items at the door.
Keep hands and legs inside the kart at all times.
I think that since they were labeled as blue villagers that they are in fact blue. The other color could be an indication of a power or just a compliment to their color in the game.
Maybe this whole color thing is cbears payback for redwills game where he was the only blue in a sea of role players haha
obhave wrote:I think that since they were labeled as blue villagers that they are in fact blue. The other color could be an indication of a power or just a compliment to their color in the game.
Maybe this whole color thing is cbears payback for redwills game where he was the only blue in a sea of role players haha
At this point, I could only rationalize a vote for someone who hasn't posted yet. On the same note, I can't rationalize a quick vote on any of them, because I don't want us to accidentally lynch a RPer just because they haven't had a chance to check in.
obhave wrote:I think that since they were labeled as blue villagers that they are in fact blue. The other color could be an indication of a power or just a compliment to their color in the game.
Maybe this whole color thing is cbears payback for redwills game where he was the only blue in a sea of role players haha
The colors question was more of a joke pointed at our recent "what do the colors mean???" games (hence, my facepalm).
It was the strikethrough that I couldn't see which had me baffled. I wondered if it meant ulf wasn't actually dead. PFIDC cleared that up.
obhave wrote:I think that since they were labeled as blue villagers that they are in fact blue. The other color could be an indication of a power or just a compliment to their color in the game.
dagny wrote:At this point, I could only rationalize a vote for someone who hasn't posted yet. On the same note, I can't rationalize a quick vote on any of them, because I don't want us to accidentally lynch a RPer just because they haven't had a chance to check in.
Hopefully, more players will weigh in soon.
I thought you didn't like when people voted for non-participants so early? Or am I wrong about that?
dagny wrote:At this point, I could only rationalize a vote for someone who hasn't posted yet. On the same note, I can't rationalize a quick vote on any of them, because I don't want us to accidentally lynch a RPer just because they haven't had a chance to check in.
Hopefully, more players will weigh in soon.
I thought you didn't like when people voted for non-participants so early? Or am I wrong about that?
Its also only two hours into the game, silliness to call anyone quiet.
dagny wrote:At this point, I could only rationalize a vote for someone who hasn't posted yet. On the same note, I can't rationalize a quick vote on any of them, because I don't want us to accidentally lynch a RPer just because they haven't had a chance to check in.
Hopefully, more players will weigh in soon.
I thought you didn't like when people voted for non-participants so early? Or am I wrong about that?
This early in the game, barring any RPer info to guide us, I advocate eliminating non players. However, I like to give them a chance to weigh in before casting a vote. Maybe that's your confusion.
If we're just going to eliminate someone for being a "non" player, then I would look at BigMcK. That guy signs up for everything but I don't really ever recall him actually playing.
On my stupid 'smart' phone, colors are blocks so you can not read any text. Between the bug-eyed swim goggle kid and the color thing, I guess I need a tether to this laptop.
Crankshaft wrote:If we're just going to eliminate someone for being a "non" player, then I would look at BigMcK. That guy signs up for everything but I don't really ever recall him actually playing.
He actually gets the longest leeway from me, being on the West coast. However, I'm also in california, but I'm here.
I must concur, in the last few games, he has signed up and not participated much.
Where are Pavel and canaan??? Pavel is, like, warz godfather, and canaan is just warz fun.
BigMcK wrote:On my stupid 'smart' phone, colors are blocks so you can not read any text. Between the bug-eyed swim goggle kid and the color thing, I guess I need a tether to this laptop.
Crankshaft wrote:If we're just going to eliminate someone for being a "non" player, then I would look at BigMcK. That guy signs up for everything but I don't really ever recall him actually playing.
He actually gets the longest leeway from me, being on the West coast. However, I'm also in california, but I'm here.
I must concur, in the last few games, he has signed up and not participated much.
Where are Pavel and canaan??? Pavel is, like, warz godfather, and canaan is just warz fun.
I guess this is where I get confused. You will give certain people leeway, including yourself, for not participating because of time differences. Completely understandable. However, everyone can have a reason to not participate. And if we wait for them to weigh in, are they no longer a non-participant?
My thinking is, if we get a couple days in and haven't heard from someone, kill them. Otherwise, it's just a shot in the dark as much as anyone else this early.
