MWB wrote:I'm most suspicious of sdm, c2i, nan, and troy right now. Once the Juice vote started with sdm the other three voted along with him relatively quickly. Seems like it would be a wolfy thing to do to try to get a quick bandwagon going on a player that will contribute. It also put a very abrupt end to the thg bandwagon that was well underway.
that is actually a really bad wolf move.
anytime I have been red it has always been said
1, don't start a bandwagon untill the end of the game
2. don't follow right behind a fellow wolf at the begining of votes
so C2I, nan, and or troy loney could be bad.
my thoughts right now are 1 of c2i or troy. possibly both
sdm, I agree that starting on juice would have been a really bad wolf move. I'm least suspicious of you in that group because of that. More concerned about the other three that voted so quickly and close together. My guess is that only one of them is bad.
My thoughts are at this moment that KS was our seer and voted for Dagny. I know the possibility of him investigating someone and finding a Red that quick is low, but it may be worth a shot.
I threw Slappy's name out there because he trended towards being quiet the last couple of games and just wanted to see if tossing his name out early would wake him up.
If a C2i vote comes up I would be willing to go that way too.
thehockeyguru wrote:My thoughts are at this moment that KS was our seer and voted for Dagny. I know the possibility of him investigating someone and finding a Red that quick is low, but it may be worth a shot.
I threw Slappy's name out there because he trended towards being quiet the last couple of games and just wanted to see if tossing his name out early would wake him up.
If a C2i vote comes up I would be willing to go that way too.
That does make the most sense. I could clearly see him researching her on night 1.
thehockeyguru wrote:My thoughts are at this moment that KS was our seer and voted for Dagny. I know the possibility of him investigating someone and finding a Red that quick is low, but it may be worth a shot.
I threw Slappy's name out there because he trended towards being quiet the last couple of games and just wanted to see if tossing his name out early would wake him up.
If a C2i vote comes up I would be willing to go that way too.
I can kinda see that. When I was the seer I think dagny was one of the first people I looked into... You always want to know which participators are good/bad. KS switched off dagny though and went with juice. Would he switch if he knew she was bad?
Juice saying, "I'm a wolf" is what caused me to vote for him. There wasn't a bandwagon going on him at that point. There aren't a whole lot of people that remember the early days of people saying "I'm a wolf" and that being okay. The thing i'm curious about though is NAN knew that joke and yet still said we should vote for him now to avoid confusion later on in the game.
thehockeyguru wrote:My thoughts are at this moment that KS was our seer and voted for Dagny. I know the possibility of him investigating someone and finding a Red that quick is low, but it may be worth a shot.
I threw Slappy's name out there because he trended towards being quiet the last couple of games and just wanted to see if tossing his name out early would wake him up.
If a C2i vote comes up I would be willing to go that way too.
I can kinda see that. When I was the seer I think dagny was one of the first people I looked into... You always want to know which participators are good/bad. KS switched off dagny though and went with juice. Would he switch if he knew she was bad?
Thats a good question. I dont think being the seer though he could press hard for someone on day 1. He probably wasn't expecting to be killed night 2 either.
thehockeyguru wrote:My thoughts are at this moment that KS was our seer and voted for Dagny. I know the possibility of him investigating someone and finding a Red that quick is low, but it may be worth a shot.
I threw Slappy's name out there because he trended towards being quiet the last couple of games and just wanted to see if tossing his name out early would wake him up.
If a C2i vote comes up I would be willing to go that way too.
I can kinda see that. When I was the seer I think dagny was one of the first people I looked into... You always want to know which participators are good/bad. KS switched off dagny though and went with juice. Would he switch if he knew she was bad?
Yes, if he wanted to survive more than one round. maybe the wolves saw that he knew something by coming out with the dagny vote and killed him because of that.
Troy Loney wrote:
Yes, if he wanted to survive more than one round. maybe the wolves saw that he knew something by coming out with the dagny vote and killed him because of that.
Troy Loney wrote:
Yes, if he wanted to survive more than one round. maybe the wolves saw that he knew something by coming out with the dagny vote and killed him because of that.
This.
The only other thing to consider is that the wolves are just simply framing dagny....but that would be dagny's defense, which is reasonable. but the wolves could have killed canaan to frame me or based their kill on any other of the random votes that people threw out.
i'm sticking with my dagny vote though, even if it is just an obvious "frame job".
I agree with some others that he was getting way too specific on his why he would be around veyr little. I don't know. Still too early to figure some things out.
newarenanow wrote:I'm going to go with lynch shaftnutz
I agree with some others that he was getting way too specific on his why he would be around veyr little. I don't know. Still too early to figure some things out.
I really have nothing else right now.
Wait what? I have been on constantly....are you talking about slappy? I had a conference call this morning...but I don't recall ever saying anything about being "around very little".
newarenanow wrote:I'm going to go with lynch shaftnutz
I agree with some others that he was getting way too specific on his why he would be around veyr little. I don't know. Still too early to figure some things out.
I really have nothing else right now.
Wait what? I have been on constantly....are you talking about slappy? I had a conference call this morning...but I don't recall ever saying anything about being "around very little".
newarenanow wrote:I'm going to go with lynch shaftnutz
I agree with some others that he was getting way too specific on his why he would be around veyr little. I don't know. Still too early to figure some things out.
I really have nothing else right now.
Wait what? I have been on constantly....are you talking about slappy? I had a conference call this morning...but I don't recall ever saying anything about being "around very little".
