Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

ExPatriatePen wrote:tifosi77 wrote:The Department of the Navy was, is and ever shall be, the primary tool for military intervention and security.
The Navy is international logistics. A very important component to be sure, but "Primary Tool"? I wouldn't want to have to argue that point with the late General Schwarzkopf.

King Sid the Great 87 wrote:I've seen nothing about the payroll holiday being extended, so we will all be paying 2% more.
What a gimmick, as are all "temporary" tax policy changes.


tifosi77 wrote:King Sid the Great 87 wrote:I've seen nothing about the payroll holiday being extended, so we will all be paying 2% more.
What a gimmick, as are all "temporary" tax policy changes.
I've always thought that 'holiday' nothing more than a semantic gimmick, anyway. At my take-home level 2% amounts to less than $100 every month. What economic activity am I going to generate with that $100 that I could not do without it? It's honestly less than negligible.

tifosi77 wrote:King Sid the Great 87 wrote:I've seen nothing about the payroll holiday being extended, so we will all be paying 2% more.
What a gimmick, as are all "temporary" tax policy changes.
I've always thought that 'holiday' nothing more than a semantic gimmick, anyway. At my take-home level 2% amounts to less than $100 every month. What economic activity am I going to generate with that $100 that I could not do without it? It's honestly less than negligible.

tifosi77 wrote:ExPatriatePen wrote:tifosi77 wrote:The Department of the Navy was, is and ever shall be, the primary tool for military intervention and security.
The Navy is international logistics. A very important component to be sure, but "Primary Tool"? I wouldn't want to have to argue that point with the late General Schwarzkopf.
I wouldn't want you to argue that, either, cos it's wrong.![]()
When crisis erupts in the world, the president does not ask "Where is the nearest Army brigade?" Land forces (Army and Air Force) require land to operate from, meaning permission from some host country..... permission that, often times, is not forthcoming. For example, the Iraq assault in Operation Desert Storm was only possible because Saudi Arabia allowed U.S. forces to stage out of their territory. However, there were three carrier battle groups operating in the Red Sea and Persian Gulf within weeks of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait representing a tactical capability greater than the entire Iraqi air force at the time, and two more carriers eventually completed the order of battle. All the while patiently waiting for the land forces to build up over three months......
Nearly half the world's population - and its associated infrastructure - lives within 150 miles of the sea. An aircraft carrier represents 4.5 acres of sovereign U.S. territory and its battle group can steam wherever it pleases. Until either of these factors change, the Navy will be primary tool of 'diplomacy by other means'.


columbia wrote:The lottery of lifeSpoiler:



Gaucho wrote:Why would I want to be born in Singapore?




viva la ben wrote:I don't understand how anyone could say no deal is better than any deal.
Everyone's taxes increase without a deal.

viva la ben wrote:I don't understand how anyone could say no deal is better than any deal.
Everyone's taxes increase without a deal.

Hockeynut! wrote:Israel is in the top 20???

ExPatriatePen wrote:bhaw wrote:So Cliff's Notes for the politically challenged:
Until I get my raise to $450k (:lol:), I will experience no difference in my taxes?
Is any part of your income derived from Dividends? Are you subject to the AMT?
If the answer is no, probably no change in federal income tax. No comment on the 'stealth tax' though.

ExPatriatePen wrote:I did conceed the logistics angle. But as there's only so much you can with ariel attacks and shelling. Eventually you need "boots on the ground".
It's like saying the most important part of Amazons business model is UPS
Gaucho wrote:Why would I want to be born in Singapore?

tifosi77 wrote:King Sid the Great 87 wrote:I've seen nothing about the payroll holiday being extended, so we will all be paying 2% more.
What a gimmick, as are all "temporary" tax policy changes.
I've always thought that 'holiday' nothing more than a semantic gimmick, anyway. At my take-home level 2% amounts to less than $100 every month. What economic activity am I going to generate with that $100 that I could not do without it? It's honestly less than negligible.



shafnutz05 wrote:
I found this to be exceptionally well-done.

Gaucho wrote:It's about three minutes too long.

eddysnake wrote:I don't understand what this is?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests