In other news, this thread will be among the most boring you've read in the past month.
pcm wrote:We certainly don't have a need for a young 6'4" defenseman with snarl to play on our bottom pairing for less $1m. Lets go sign an old guy for much more money to do the same job, but who will only get worse with time.
RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:Glad this thread was created actually as I can't figure out any scenario outside of injury where Bortuzzo sees the ice this year. I like him but clearly that doesn't have any correlation to what the Pens do.
Shero is not done for sure but if Nisky and Engo remain, Bort is hosed.
The U wrote:Bortuzzo is exactly what this team needs. Big, tough, young, can fight, can hit, high energy, has untapped potential,
Pavel Bure wrote:LOL @ the people calling Bort a 5 or 6. At what point in his career has he taken and held that spot in an NHL line up? He's not very good. For every one Scuderi who starts like dog doo-doo there are 1,000 other players who start like dog doo-doo and stay that way.
columbia wrote:No offense against the dude, but what exactly leads Bortuzzo to believe that he deserves anything beyond the cursory/required raise?
Users browsing this forum: Antonio and 6 guests