Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf


shmenguin wrote:last year showed that the length of the full season can be pretty arbitrary when it comes to the ultimate cup winner.

Gaucho wrote:Meeting pushed back to 10:30 due to doughnut supplier stuck in traffic.


Gaucho wrote:Pierre LeBrun @Real_ESPNLeBrun
NHLPA sent letter to members of Cdn Parliament. Letter can be found at http://es.pn/10tpMfb (ESPN) or http://bit.ly/10tpPrp (TSN)


Gaucho wrote:Seems like a lame attempt to apply pressure on the owner.



Gaucho wrote:Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
We're hearing today's NHLPA proposal to NHL will include increasing the NHL's $211M Make Whole provision by another $180M.




Gaucho wrote:Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
We're also hearing the NHLPA proposal will work off a percentage of HRR -- as requested by NHL -- and not a guaranteed dollar amount.

newarenanow wrote:Gaucho wrote:Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
We're also hearing the NHLPA proposal will work off a percentage of HRR -- as requested by NHL -- and not a guaranteed dollar amount.
That's good.


Gaucho wrote:Chris Johnston @reporterchris
Donald Fehr says sides are $182 million apart over the five-year deal.


tfrizz wrote:Gaucho wrote:Chris Johnston @reporterchris
Donald Fehr says sides are $182 million apart over the five-year deal.
To add some perspective, that amounts to $1.2-million per team per season. If that number is correct, then I don't see why those terms wouldn't be agreed to.


interstorm wrote:tfrizz wrote:Gaucho wrote:Chris Johnston @reporterchris
Donald Fehr says sides are $182 million apart over the five-year deal.
To add some perspective, that amounts to $1.2-million per team per season. If that number is correct, then I don't see why those terms wouldn't be agreed to.
You never know...the NFL, which makes a lot more, had the officials on strike for just $100,000 a team.

no name wrote:But all in all, i have to admit its not unreasonable for the players to want their existing contracts be paid in full. If you offer a player a contract you should be ready to pay them in full.

no name wrote:
But all in all, i have to admit its not unreasonable for the players to want their existing contracts be paid in full. If you offer a player a contract you should be ready to pay them in full.


no name wrote:interstorm wrote:tfrizz wrote:Gaucho wrote:Chris Johnston @reporterchris
Donald Fehr says sides are $182 million apart over the five-year deal.
To add some perspective, that amounts to $1.2-million per team per season. If that number is correct, then I don't see why those terms wouldn't be agreed to.
You never know...the NFL, which makes a lot more, had the officials on strike for just $100,000 a team.
Its all in how you break down the numbers. The owners already said they would pay 211 million, thats 7.03 over 5 years, add that to the 182 the players want in addition thats, 6.03 over 5 year. In total 13.6 million paid by each team over 5 years. Sounds like alot of coin to me. Some teams just don't have that lying around. But we'll see how Gary and Company look at this.
But all in all, i have to admit its not unreasonable for the players to want their existing contracts be paid in full. If you offer a player a contract you should be ready to pay them in full.
Gaucho wrote:no name wrote:
But all in all, i have to admit its not unreasonable for the players to want their existing contracts be paid in full. If you offer a player a contract you should be ready to pay them in full.
This is the part I absolutely don't understand. Did some of the owners offer those big 12-year-contracts with the soon to be expiring CBA in mind, ie with the intention of not honoring them anyway?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests