DelPen wrote:I keep seeing tweets about how great the 3rd line is based on analytics which goes to show analytics are a useful tool but the eye test still matters. That line is garbage. This team needs a massive shakeup in players and lines in the bottom 6.
I'm not sure where people are looking to find good analytics for the 3rd line.
--75 minutes together for the trio
--Corsi % is 2 shots below 50%
--Shots % is 1 shot above 50%
--Goals For % is ZERO, because they have no points in 10 plus games. (they've been on the ice for 4 at 5v5)
--Expected Goals For % is a hair above 50%
--Scoring Chances For % is 2 chances below 50%
--High Danger Chances For % is 1 chance above 50%
--High Danger Goals For % is zero, because they have no points in 10 plus games (they've been on the ice for 2 HDGA)
To make matters worse, McGinn and Carter have been together for 237 minutes without Blueger
--42% CF, 46% SF, 44% GF (actually have 8 goals for, 10 against just these 2 on the line), xGF% is 41%, HDCF 38%, HDGF 22%
McGinn has played 135 minutes without Carter or Blueger, and with the exception of a nearly even 50% CF%, all his numbers are mid-50% without Teddy and Jeff.
What does that all mean? Well, the analytics are telling me that Carter and Blueger are @ss, and if we had some decent bottom 6 centers maybe some of these guys like Heinen or Kapanen or McGinn or DOC would start scoring more. The eye test at least matches up with the Carter/Blueger are @ss theory.
Sounds like a much improved 3C (I like where Poehling's game has progressed as a 4C, but don't think he's a 3C at this point) is the Penguins #1 target on the trade market...when Hextall finally realizes there is a problem.